Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Moonbats Suppress Their Child's Gender
Stop the ACLU ^ | 29 Jun 09 | Van Helsing

Posted on 06/29/2009 11:26:55 AM PDT by Jay777

Not everyone should be a parent. In Sweden, a pair of moonbats are attempting to turn their child into a freak by pretending the poor kid has no gender:

Pop’s parents, both 24, made a decision when their baby was born to keep Pop’s sex a secret. Aside from a select few — those who have changed the child’s diaper — nobody knows Pop’s gender; if anyone enquires, Pop’s parents simply say they don’t disclose this information.

In an interview with newspaper Svenska Dagbladet in March, the parents were quoted saying their decision was rooted in the feminist philosophy that gender is a social construction. …

Pop’s wardrobe includes everything from dresses to trousers and Pop’s hairstyle changes on a regular basis. And Pop usually decides how Pop is going to dress on a given morning.

Although Pop knows that there are physical differences between a boy and a girl, Pop’s parents never use personal pronouns when referring to the child — they just say Pop.

“I believe that the self-confidence and personality that Pop has shaped will remain for a lifetime,” said Pop’s mother. Or rather, the psychological damaged Pop’s moonbat parents are inflicting will last a lifetime. A similar experiment was tried in 1967,

(Excerpt) Read more at stoptheaclu.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: childabuse; homosexualagenda; moonbat; parenting; psychology

1 posted on 06/29/2009 11:26:58 AM PDT by Jay777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jay777
... gender is a social construction. …

Gender is a grammatical construct.

Sex, on the other hand is reality.

2 posted on 06/29/2009 12:05:03 PM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

Therapists are lining up for this case.


3 posted on 06/29/2009 12:11:30 PM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

Poor kid.


4 posted on 06/29/2009 12:11:37 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

Just throw a few toys out in front of it and see which they take interest in. Include a few cute dolls and a few toy trucks, I’ll be we find out if it is a boy or a girl with 95% accuracy.


5 posted on 06/29/2009 12:19:44 PM PDT by the_devils_advocate_666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

When feminist dogma is put into action it fails. However, true feminists deny the failure and blame the Patriarchy.

What happens when the child reaches the age when he/she is the object of the attention of the “other” sex? Will he/she be attractive to boys one day and girls another day? More than likely, he/she will NOT receive any attention from EITHER sex.

What the parents are doing is cruelty. But then all other feminist dogmas result in cruel suffering too.


6 posted on 06/29/2009 12:30:29 PM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (feminist dogma is completely out of phase with human nature.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

It must be a boy.

They would never try this with a girl.


7 posted on 06/29/2009 12:32:38 PM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment (Is this field required?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repealthe17thAmendment

You got that right.


8 posted on 06/29/2009 12:34:51 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jay777
In an interview with newspaper Svenska Dagbladet in March, the parents were quoted saying their decision was rooted in the feminist philosophy that gender is a social construction. …

Just wait till pop goes Pop's weasel.
9 posted on 06/29/2009 12:35:54 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repealthe17thAmendment

I agree. If it was a girl they would try and make her a little dyke. These people are sick and should not be allowed to have kids.


10 posted on 06/29/2009 12:38:18 PM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

Gender Ambiguous kid? Intersex?

When the kid is still in diapers it really doesn’t matter. 100 years ago boys wore dresses till they were atleast 6 and we all survived. The kid will figure out who it is in the next several years and likely show no ill effects. It’s the adults who get aqll in an uproar about such stuff, not the kids.


11 posted on 06/29/2009 1:12:20 PM PDT by The_Repugnant_Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

Again selfish freaks try to satisfy some insane selfish experiment and their child be damned.


12 posted on 06/29/2009 1:27:01 PM PDT by vpintheak (Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

My question is: how did they make Pop? Obviously, it wasn’t a social thing that caused the conception of this poor child. It’s a good thing they knew who was the boy and who was the girl.


13 posted on 06/29/2009 1:39:55 PM PDT by murron (Proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jay777
I'm a boy, I'm a boy, but my ma won't admit it.
14 posted on 06/29/2009 5:15:49 PM PDT by RansomOttawa (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson