Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarkozy says burqas have no place in France
Reuters ^

Posted on 06/22/2009 7:55:15 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: Freelance Warrior
Such argument is applicable to many things (sun-glasses, masks, containers with liquids, kitchen knives) it's a question of one's fantasy. If there's a REAL problem with the banks, burkas can be banned in banks, not in the street.

I somewhat agree with you about "the street" in that government should have no say over what costume you choose to wear or not to wear in public. After all, some ultra right fundamentalist Christians would probably be offended about what Mrs. "Eye Candy" (Carla Bundi) Sarkozy (ooh-la-la) chooses to wear at the beach and that would be a shameful afront to the eye. But, in certain places, say public buildings where business is being done and could be threatened by a robber in a burka; schools, courts, etc.; I would fully back the enforcement of a dress code and I also believe employers have a legitimate right to require dress codes for employees.

61 posted on 06/22/2009 10:00:57 AM PDT by meandog (Doh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Freelance Warrior

The Burkah HIDES the face...therefore makes the person underneath UNIDENTIFIABLE. That would be like people going around with ski-masks or scarves over their faces.....ridiculous.


62 posted on 06/22/2009 10:04:11 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ford4000
A society can't exist without imposing certain values on its members. The methods include violence as well. Do you agree?

Is it a right deduction from yor post that there must be only the government which is allowed to use violence to impose moral or religious values?

63 posted on 06/22/2009 10:08:26 AM PDT by Freelance Warrior (A Russian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: meandog

I fully agree with you - my thanks for thorough explaining of this point of view.


64 posted on 06/22/2009 10:11:33 AM PDT by Freelance Warrior (A Russian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: meandog
We'll have to ban veils for vows too in the former land of the free. They might be bank robbers, or homely switch ins.


65 posted on 06/22/2009 10:19:58 AM PDT by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Vive la France!


66 posted on 06/22/2009 10:21:56 AM PDT by B-Chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
It's a matter of personal taste. A XIX century veil looks probably more elegant. I can understand why people would like to be unidentifiable - privacy - the same reason why they want it when online.
67 posted on 06/22/2009 10:22:22 AM PDT by Freelance Warrior (A Russian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Freelance Warrior

It ought to be obvious that Western societies violent coercion by individuals is and must remain illegal. Laws must be enforced and that may require force but this must be reserved to government.

You sound like a libertarian. Don’t be fooled by talk of freedom to dress a certain way. For the most part, these women are either brainwashed or forced into it.


68 posted on 06/22/2009 10:32:54 AM PDT by Ford4000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Ford4000; All

Like Mormons are brainwashed? Like Catholics are brainwashed on issues like birth control? abortion? The freepers on this website have grown control-freakish indeed if they want to ban conservative forms of reverent dress. And please spare me, everyone, about your knowledge of muslims. I know many muslim women and they not only choose to wear it, but speak reverently about how it de-sexualizes society and honors God. Sheesh. I stop posting in FR for awhile only to come back and find advocates for banning clothing that most muslims rightfully find reverent and conservative (and that includes women). Sad.


69 posted on 06/22/2009 11:41:28 AM PDT by Bishop_Malachi (Liberal Socialism - A philosophy which advocates spreading a low standard of living equally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Bishop_Malachi

You equate Muslims to Mormons and Catholics at your peril.

How do you suppose Islamic radicalization happens? It starts with coercion and violence against moderate muslims. Next you will be telling us that this is legitimate religious expression.

I don’t like the idea of dictating clothing choices but in this case if it helps to break the process of radicalization then I am all for it.


70 posted on 06/22/2009 12:02:49 PM PDT by Ford4000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; All
This is how bad it has got. I remember when I refered to my french fries as freedom fries... Now, I wish we could follow in France's footsteps. That's what happens when France elects a decent conservative with a spine and we elect a flaming socialist piece of garbage.

I miss George W. Bush!

http://billykess.com/

71 posted on 06/22/2009 12:29:13 PM PDT by BillyKess (Please help spread the truth: http://exposeplannedparenthood.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freelance Warrior
"Those are just two of the emirates, aren't they?"

There are seven emirates: Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Sharjah, Ajman, Umm al-Quwain, Ras al-Khaimah, and Fujairah.

Dubai and Abu Dhabi are the most frequently visited by tourists, and have the most significant expat population.

Sharjah and Ajman are the most conservative emirates.

That said, I have read hijabs are not required of female tourists in Sharjah, but that may have changed.

Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Sharjah represent the vast majority of the UAE's population (80%).

Dubai even has liquor stores. Muslims cannot own or enter them, but non Muslims may purchase alcohol.

72 posted on 06/22/2009 1:42:43 PM PDT by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

In Franceistan? Really?


73 posted on 06/22/2009 4:39:48 PM PDT by I Hate Obama (Just remember - if the world didn't suck, we would all fall off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson