Posted on 06/19/2009 9:21:51 PM PDT by ianschwartz
Ann Coulter on Sen. Barbara Boxer's decision to dress down Brig. General Michael Walsh. Coulter called Sen. Boxer's remark arrogant and ignorant.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
I did not see the video.
But isn’t this like the people here on Free Republic who are outraged that the press called George Bush “Mr. Bush”, rather than “Mr. President”?
I’m having a hardf time bein g outraged.
ou are too polite...In the words of Letterman for the Liberal Buffoon.... The reference should be “Slut Boxer!”
How dare Boxer TRY to demean Our Great Military with her Slutty Comments and Demands!:-)
It's about Boxer having no clue. This officer has spent decades using "Sir" and "Ma'am" when addressing superiors and Boxer thinks he is dis'n her.
Why would going to a strip club hurt you politically?
Bruce was giving a speech and Boxer's thugs verbally attacked him and had television video cameras recording everything for maximum saturation. It was a setup. The Dems were winning everywhere, but Bruce had inched ahead. To them the end always justifies the means, and they have the press to amplify, attack, or knock down whatever they want.
Bruce barely lost. He was the strongest member of the GOP ticket in 1992, an unabashed conservative and one of the nicest people in the world. Boxer is a shrew. Words cannot describe this loud, brazen witch. Enough conservatives probably stayed home to push Boxer across. Clinton and Feinstein won in wipeouts. They didn't need to cheat unless you count Perot being in the race as deliberately helpful to Clinton.
Wellllllll
Ms Boxer,
when you act like a patriotic Senator, I may be inclined to call you Senator.
Until then, I’ll call em as I see em and refer to you as “M’am” because that’s the way my mamma raised me.
Besides, it’s a durn bit better than the calling you the “haughty traitorous bitch” you deserve to be called.
Breath taking?
I was thinking more . . .
fart inducing.
Geez, some of these Lords need to be taken down a notch or two.
= = =
Actually, one begins to have sympathy for some of the . . . uhhh . . .
actors
. . . in . . . uhhhh . . . the French Revolution.
The UNuseful idiots in the halls of Congress so given to treason
need to be keel hauled under the USS RONALD REAGAN . . . stem to stern.
I think a response of
“No M’am” would have been quite fitting.
I prefer
“M’am Boxer-face”
serves
in the Senate . . .
I think, then, that must be akin to . . .
Farmer brown’s brood mare being
“serviced” by neighbor John’s stallion.
Obviously Boxerface must be the servee . . . being the flaming media ho, she so relentlessly is.
. . . except, of course, when writing legislation or opening her mouth . . . when she’s obviously the servicer in the great farming tradition.
Boxerface was sooooo far his inferior . . .
“Your unroyal slug sh__” would have been most appropriate.
General, Sir. I definitely know that I have earned it.”
INDEED.
I don’t think it’s worth per se outrage in and of itself . . .
i.e.
BEYOND the outrage of this creature showing her face in public and daring to speak as though in behalf of any people of the USA at all.
She’s a Z last class donkey . . . a treasonous, drunk rabid donkey, at that.
hmmmm
Boxerface
Boxerslutface
. . . fits.
INDEED.
Then why pretend that you are outraged over this issue? It makes Conservatives look like idiots.
If you can’t stand that W was called Mr. Bush, then why not have outrage in Boxer’s incidence.
If you cannot be consistent, then you cannot make a valid argument.
I didn’t have such attitudes about W to begin with.
I occasionally felt he was due more respect than he got by some hereon but it was never a raging emotional thing with me.
Boxerface is a dispicable traitor that I do have some emotion about . . . she’s a part of a clique of hideous folks who deserve a LOT of censure etc.
Barbara's remark was certainly ungracious, and disrespectful to the citizens of the United States. Our military stands ready to die defending our country. Smart-mouthing the military just shows the disdain the Socialist Democrats have for the USA.
It reflects poorly on those who would continue to vote for such classless people, IMO. I guess their "bennies" are more important than the lives of babies and the future of our economic system and culture. Is this an example of where feminism is leading us?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.