I don’t think it’s worth per se outrage in and of itself . . .
i.e.
BEYOND the outrage of this creature showing her face in public and daring to speak as though in behalf of any people of the USA at all.
She’s a Z last class donkey . . . a treasonous, drunk rabid donkey, at that.
Then why pretend that you are outraged over this issue? It makes Conservatives look like idiots.
If you can’t stand that W was called Mr. Bush, then why not have outrage in Boxer’s incidence.
If you cannot be consistent, then you cannot make a valid argument.