To: GodGunsGuts
Can’t wait—this will be amusing. Can you post the bibliography that the author has provided so we can do some advance reading?
The entire series has been peer reviewed, right?
9 posted on
06/18/2009 8:58:20 AM PDT by
Buck W.
(The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
To: Buck W.
The entire series has been peer reviewed, right?
Most of the greatest achievements of science took place before what we call today peer review.
14 posted on
06/18/2009 9:02:31 AM PDT by
aruanan
To: Buck W.
> The entire series has been peer reviewed, right?
Do you mean like Global Warming and Piltdown Man?
17 posted on
06/18/2009 9:06:30 AM PDT by
Westbrook
(Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
To: Buck W.
"Can’t wait—this will be amusing. Can you post the bibliography that the author has provided so we can do some advance reading?" Here's a rebuttal Snelling wrote on TrueOrigin.org.
Others may be interested in the articles on the site.
21 posted on
06/18/2009 9:10:08 AM PDT by
GourmetDan
(Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
To: Buck W.; GodGunsGuts
22 posted on
06/18/2009 9:10:40 AM PDT by
Natufian
(The mesolithic wasn't so bad, was it?)
To: Buck W.
Creation science journals are all peer reviewed. However, Answers Magazine is a popular science and apologetics magazine. As such, it receives the same amount of peer review as other popular science mags, such as New Scientist and Scientific American. If you object to Answers Magazine on this basis, then you must object to all popular science magazines.
To: Buck W.
The entire series has been peer reviewed, right? What if we can't trust the vaunted "peers?"
47 posted on
06/18/2009 9:40:35 AM PDT by
SkyPilot
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson