[SkyPilot]

The entire series has been peer reviewed, right?

What if we can't trust the vaunted "peers?"

[Buck W.]

“What if we can’t trust the vaunted “peers?””

You’re right—let’s just forget about it. Creation rationalizers will believe anything, anyway.

[CottShop]

No no, don’tyacha know that any creationist or id material MUSt be peer reveiwed a 1000 times over in order to be valid? Whiel ‘peer review’ for claims made based on assumptions about macroevolution and ages are accepted at face value?

The peer review system has become a joke! It used to be impartial and unbiased, and used to be a strict process that demanded actual evidence, and took a very long time to be approved, but no longer- as long as assumptions about macroeovlution and old age are present, tyhen by golyl it must be a vaslid claim nowadays.