Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

DEVELOPING HARD!
1 posted on 06/08/2009 1:08:49 PM PDT by DCBryan1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: DCBryan1

Id the Court hears the case, and if they ultimately rule the use of TARP funds for auto makers was not authorized, somebody should actually go to jail for misappropriation of funds.

If the CEO of a corporation had done something similar with borrowed funds, he would do time.

In this case, would it be Turbo Tax Timmy? Or would it be an impeachable offense for The Won?


32 posted on 06/08/2009 1:17:31 PM PDT by savedbygrace (You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCBryan1

WOAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


33 posted on 06/08/2009 1:17:41 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Obama. Clear and Pres__ent Danger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCBryan1

Rule of Law rocks USA!


35 posted on 06/08/2009 1:18:26 PM PDT by LikeLight (http://www.believersguidetolegalissues.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCBryan1
Obama admin had urged USSC NOT to keep chrysler deal on hold

Urging thats not above your pay grade, Obomba?

37 posted on 06/08/2009 1:18:41 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCBryan1

Obviously Obama will say the court is too Conservative. USSC may be the last chance to save America. I nominate everything that Obama does be challenged in the USSC starting with his official record of BIRTH.


40 posted on 06/08/2009 1:18:53 PM PDT by Typical_Whitey (Hey Obama how many Freedoms have you taken away from Americans today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCBryan1

Obviously Barry got the twitter on the back nine.

;)


42 posted on 06/08/2009 1:19:20 PM PDT by maggief (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCBryan1

SCOTUSblog is saying that nothing can be read into her brief statement. All it means is that she, or perhaps the full court, need a bit more time to decide whether to take the case or not.

At the top here: http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/ for now.


43 posted on 06/08/2009 1:20:22 PM PDT by green iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCBryan1
FROM THE LINK

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has temporarily delayed Chrysler's sale to Fiat.

Ginsburg says in an order Monday that the sale is "stayed pending further order."

The action indicates that the delay may only be temporary.

Chrysler has said a delay could scuttle the deal.

A federal appeals court in New York had earlier approved the sale, but gave opponents some time to file an appeal with the Supreme Court.

The Chrysler case could set a precedent for General Motors[GMGMQ 1.21 0.345 (+39.88%) ], which is using a similar quick-sale strategy in its bankruptcy in New York.

A group of Indiana pension funds argued that the sale of Chrysler unlawfully rewards unsecured creditors ahead of secured lenders and amounts to an illegal reorganization plan, and that the U.S. Treasury Department overstepped its legal authority by using bailout funds for Chrysler when Congress intended the money for banks.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

44 posted on 06/08/2009 1:20:40 PM PDT by DCBryan1 (Arm Pilots&Teachers. Build the Wall. Export Illegals. Profile Muslims. Execute child molesters RFN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCBryan1

Benito Obama will not be pleased.


46 posted on 06/08/2009 1:21:13 PM PDT by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCBryan1
Photobucket

Ruth??? Ruth??? Dammit Ruth...let me in.

49 posted on 06/08/2009 1:22:44 PM PDT by IrishPennant (RLT = Radical Left Terrorism...feel it????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCBryan1

You’d think Obama would have learned from FDR when trying to take over an economy: stack the Supreme Court with cronies before breaking the laws written in the Constitution. It’s also in every “dictator for dummies” book ever written. Jeez, where did Obama get his education?!?


50 posted on 06/08/2009 1:22:50 PM PDT by NotSoModerate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCBryan1; penelopesire; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; ...

Woo Hoo!!

~~~

Laughing at this headline:

Obama lawyer: Chrysler-Fiat must be allowed

http://money.cnn.com/2009/06/08/news/companies/chrysler_bankruptcy/?postversion=2009060811

Excerpt:

“A top Obama administration lawyer urged the Supreme Court on Monday to allow Chrysler’s bankruptcy to proceed, noting that the needs of the economy outweigh the needs of the deal’s detractors.”

~~~

Dear God, let this be the first of MANY defeats of
Overlord Obama and his equally arrogant crew of thugs!


53 posted on 06/08/2009 1:23:11 PM PDT by STARWISE (The Art & Science Institute of Chicago Politics NE Div: now open at the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCBryan1
Ginsberg, eh. Just the right justice to use to later rule "upon further deliberation" in favor of Obama.

I would contain my enthusiasm.

54 posted on 06/08/2009 1:23:44 PM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (Our Last Best Hope: REPEAL THE 16th AMENDMENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCBryan1

There is this pesky precedence of over 200 years of business and contract law.


66 posted on 06/08/2009 1:31:54 PM PDT by safetysign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE; LucyT; BP2

GO HOOSIERS!


68 posted on 06/08/2009 1:34:38 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Hey hey! Ho ho! Where's your Birth Certificate/ We've a right to know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCBryan1

Wow, Ginsburg bitched slapped Barry.

I wonder what Zero is going to do if SCOTUS rules against him. He’s not use to being told no.


69 posted on 06/08/2009 1:35:22 PM PDT by Ticonderoga34 (A Community Organizer is the 21st century version of a Ward Heeler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCBryan1

It’s one small battle in the war.

Obama has been issuing statements as if he is the CEO of Congress. I am surprised Congress has allowed or tolerated it. I am not surprised at Ginsburg’s ruling. I thought arguing SCOTUS had no jurisdiction was a mistake. After further review, they just might side with odumba.

Time will tell if this was just a remind-him-he-is-not-the-boss of-us smackdown.

I might add one important point: my opinion is based on absolutely no knowledge of the law. :-)


73 posted on 06/08/2009 1:36:10 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCBryan1

So odious that even Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg couldn’t hide the stench. (with apologies to Ms. Buzzi).


74 posted on 06/08/2009 1:36:15 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("I've conquered my goddam willpower." Don Marquis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCBryan1

TOTUS dissed by SCOUTS......

Oops!


75 posted on 06/08/2009 1:37:04 PM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DCBryan1

Let’s hope this is Step One of an FDR-style push back by the SCOTUS against Obama.


89 posted on 06/08/2009 1:47:09 PM PDT by FreepShop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson