Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hutchison seeks to reframe conservatism issue as style, not substance (NOWAYKAY for TX GOV)
Dallas Morning News ^ | 06/07/2009 | TODD J. GILLMAN

Posted on 06/07/2009 5:42:07 AM PDT by devane617

"Because I speak in civil tones, some want to try to label me a moderate," she said. "My voting record is one of the most conservative in the U.S. Senate. ... We can't expect to remain the majority party in Texas if we drive out voters that support Republican principles but might not agree on every single issue."

(Excerpt) Read more at dallasnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: centrists; goalongtogetalong; hutchison; kaybailey; moderates; nowaykay; rino; texas; tx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: EternalVigilance
Just posting the facts of her voting record.

FWIW, I'll be supporting Perry in the primary, since he's the more conservative of the two.

21 posted on 06/07/2009 7:17:11 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

No, you’re posting DC lobbyists spin on her record. Big difference.

In my case anyway, she’s totally disqualified from the git-go because she gets the fundamental non-negotiables wrong. The protection of innocent human life is the most basic requirement for fulfilling the oath of office. It is the primary reason for the very existence of government according to our founding documents.


22 posted on 06/07/2009 7:21:56 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (They tell you that conservatism "can't win" because they don't believe in it. Duh...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
since he's the more conservative of the two.

The "lesser-of-two-evils" game is destroying America.

Rick Perry is a Democrat who for the sake of his political career - in the face of changes in the voting habits of Texans - simply changed the letter by his name.

23 posted on 06/07/2009 7:23:43 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (They tell you that conservatism "can't win" because they don't believe in it. Duh...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
No, you’re posting DC lobbyists spin on her record. Big difference.

The American Concervative Union is DC lobbyists spin?

24 posted on 06/07/2009 7:28:08 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mathluv

Or neither...

The “other” candidate is watching this all fold out...


25 posted on 06/07/2009 7:33:04 AM PDT by stevie_d_64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BilLies
I doubt if even Ronald Reagan meets the standard (of whatever) evidenced by the most of posters on this thread.

There's a difference between working with the opposition for the greater good while maintaining your principles and completely bending over in the phony spirit of bipartisanship.

26 posted on 06/07/2009 7:59:33 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist ("President Obama, your agenda is not new, it's not change, and it's not hope" - Rush Limbaugh 02/28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

Absolutely.


27 posted on 06/07/2009 8:03:24 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (They tell you that conservatism "can't win" because they don't believe in it. Duh...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
National Right to life gives her an 85 and NARAL gives her a 0. You says she is pro abortion. Care to explain?
28 posted on 06/07/2009 8:09:18 AM PDT by TWfromTEXAS (Life is the one choice that pro choicers wonÂ’t support.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: devane617

Please, dear. Don’t assume you can con everybody just because useful idiots are so abundant in the republican party.


29 posted on 06/07/2009 8:13:09 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TWfromTEXAS
Read the article.

Some anti-abortion-rights activists can't forgive the senator for her belief that abortion should remain legal...

30 posted on 06/07/2009 8:15:14 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (They tell you that conservatism "can't win" because they don't believe in it. Duh...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Absolutely.


31 posted on 06/07/2009 8:16:36 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TWfromTEXAS

If National Right to Life told me the sky is blue I’d go outside and check. They’re thoroughly compromised. I don’t trust them one bit.

If they were truly pro-life this Senator would get a zero.


32 posted on 06/07/2009 8:16:55 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (They tell you that conservatism "can't win" because they don't believe in it. Duh...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

Hey, if you want to be led around by the nose by a bunch of Washington lobbyists, that’s your lookout.


33 posted on 06/07/2009 8:17:53 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (They tell you that conservatism "can't win" because they don't believe in it. Duh...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: devane617
Kay's lifetime ACU rating is acceptable (89+), but last year she scored a dismal 76. I don't know where she comes up with "one of the most conservative".
34 posted on 06/07/2009 8:32:31 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Some months ago I looked at every pro/anti abortion vote she had EVER made. The ONLY ones she had made that were pro were about stem cell research. That does not make one pro abortion, or a RINO.
35 posted on 06/07/2009 8:49:51 AM PDT by TWfromTEXAS (Life is the one choice that pro choicers wonÂ’t support.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: devane617

If we can get Congress to Repeal the 17th Amendment and reinstate Article 1, Section 3 of the US Constitution, this type thing . . . the infestation of “inside the beltway crud” . . . would be less likely to occur.

And Kay Bailey Hutchison is NOT a spokesperson for Conservative Constitution Defenders or she would already have used her ‘soft sweet voice’ to protest the failure of 0bama to produce his long form birth certificate.


36 posted on 06/07/2009 9:00:56 AM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann in 2012. With Liz Cheney as Secretary of State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HighlyOpinionated

The one thing that sticks with me about her was that she was one of the senators that voted against furthering the impeachment actions against Bill Clinton... really pissed me off.


37 posted on 06/07/2009 9:03:49 AM PDT by djl_sa (Looking forward to 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: djl_sa
The one thing that sticks with me about her was that she was one of the senators that voted against furthering the impeachment actions against Bill Clinton... really pissed me off.

I called her office when that happened and told them I would never vote for her again. I haven't, either. Guess mine was a lonely voice. She got more votes than Bush in 2000 on the Texas ballot.

I'm no huge fan of Perry but I'll vote for him in a heartbeat over that woman.

38 posted on 06/07/2009 9:08:39 AM PDT by Al B. (Sarah Palin on the VAT: "There is nothing value-added about ANY tax.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: devane617; EternalVigilance; mathluv; TheZMan; GunsareOK; SwinneySwitch; BobL; Eagle Forgotten; ...

I just noticed the the DMN has removed the story from the feed and front page of the website. You can search and find it, but the comments were removed. The link posted here on FR still works and comments are intact. Kay’s posse in action.....NOWAYKAY NOWAYKAY NOWAYKAY


39 posted on 06/07/2009 9:20:26 AM PDT by devane617 (Republicans first strategy should be taking over the MSM. Without it we are doomed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TWfromTEXAS

Why is it alright to destroy human beings at their earliest stages of development?

How can anyone who supports the destruction of millions of human beings in this way, for the purposes of ghoulish experimentation, plausibly claim to be “pro-life”?

Please explain to me the moral difference between that and the use of the skin of dead Jews to make lampshades. Hey, it was “useful,” right?! /s


40 posted on 06/07/2009 9:25:52 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (They tell you that conservatism "can't win" because they don't believe in it. Duh...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson