1 posted on
06/06/2009 8:44:46 AM PDT by
jimbo123
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: All
2 posted on
06/06/2009 8:45:43 AM PDT by
jimbo123
To: jimbo123
While I’m all for an appropriate memorial, this ain’t the way to go about it. Fair value is the right thing to do.
3 posted on
06/06/2009 8:45:51 AM PDT by
OCCASparky
(Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
To: jimbo123
Sort of defeats the purpose of what those people died for, doesn’t it?
4 posted on
06/06/2009 8:46:05 AM PDT by
SlowBoat407
(US out of GM... NOW!)
To: jimbo123
5 posted on
06/06/2009 8:46:21 AM PDT by
Knute
To: jimbo123
This has become truly perverse. Todd Beamer is sadly shaking his head somewhere in Heaven.
6 posted on
06/06/2009 8:46:57 AM PDT by
Virginia Ridgerunner
(Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
To: jimbo123
"...to seize it. "What the hell? On what grounds?
7 posted on
06/06/2009 8:47:43 AM PDT by
Mr. K
(physically unabel to proofreed (<---oops))
To: jimbo123
8 posted on
06/06/2009 8:47:57 AM PDT by
jimbo123
To: jimbo123
At one point, wasn't the design for the memorial going to be in the shape of a crescent?
10 posted on
06/06/2009 8:48:24 AM PDT by
444Flyer
(During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.--Orwell)
To: jimbo123
14 posted on
06/06/2009 8:50:18 AM PDT by
ButThreeLeftsDo
(FreeRepublic. Monthly Donors Wanted.)
To: jimbo123
“LET’S ROLL!”
In memory, Flight 93
17 posted on
06/06/2009 8:53:37 AM PDT by
444Flyer
(During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.--Orwell)
To: jimbo123
I posted these 2 comments on a thread YESTERDAY, when the eminent domain effort was supposedly dropped (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2265693/posts):
#9 “Score a victory for the good guys in THIS battle in the property rights war, but the enemy is merely regrouping to attack on another front.
Don’t let your guard down for a minute.”
#12 “ ‘...will not use EMINENT DOMAIN to seize people’s land...’
Read the sentence with the emphasis on EMINENT DOMAIN and I think you get a feeling how Interior Secretary Ken Salazar really feels.”
To say the least I was suspicious.
20 posted on
06/06/2009 8:54:16 AM PDT by
Never on my watch
(At least with Doctors I can get a second opinion. With 'Professional Journalists' there is only one)
To: jimbo123
The Supreme Court voted for this kind of personal property grab by the government. It's called Kelo vs. New London. In effect, there really is no right to personal property anymore. Imho, one of the worst SC decisions ever.
The Supreme Court decision basically gives corrupt local and federal government officials carte blanche to steal. Government power on steroids.
21 posted on
06/06/2009 8:54:20 AM PDT by
khnyny
("The demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.")
To: jimbo123
This is a time when thousands upon thousands of Americans need to unite and prevent the government from seizing this land.........
23 posted on
06/06/2009 8:55:56 AM PDT by
Las Vegas Ron
(zer0 is doing to capitalism what Kennedy did to health care)
To: jimbo123
America -- a great idea, didn't last.
26 posted on
06/06/2009 8:57:03 AM PDT by
Clint Williams
(Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | America -- a great idea, didn't last.)
To: jimbo123
Putting up memorials to 9-11 actully glorifies the terrorism, it is why the terrorists did it.
maybe the landowners dont want to see a memorial
32 posted on
06/06/2009 9:00:19 AM PDT by
KTM rider
(.......and the sheeple feebly bleated in protest)
To: jimbo123
"Unfortunately there is one thing standing between me and that property - the rightful owners."
37 posted on
06/06/2009 9:02:05 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(USM is Gator Bait! (Congrats to U-Dub!))
To: jimbo123
Well, I think there should be a memorial of some kind to remember the heroes of Flight 93.
But why do they have to have a large national park? And why does it have to be in the inescapable shape of a Muslim crescent?
Why not just buy an acre or two at the crash site, put up a granite memorial with the names of the deceased, and arrange to have some sort of right-of-way out to the nearest road?
I don’t think the guys who gave their lives to defeat the hijackers would have wanted this.
46 posted on
06/06/2009 9:15:27 AM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: jimbo123
"They have one week to reach an agreement on the sale of their land or the government will initiate proceedings to seize it."
Seems Flight 93 went down for no reason.
47 posted on
06/06/2009 9:19:32 AM PDT by
RightOnTheLeftCoast
(1st call: Abbas. 1st interview: Al Arabiya. 1st energy decision: halt drilling in UT. Arabs 1st!)
To: jimbo123
Isn’t there a law against unlawful seizures? Maybe Supreme Court Justice Souter can clear this up for me?
59 posted on
06/06/2009 10:03:31 AM PDT by
rawhide
To: jimbo123
It’s time folks meet the grabbers with pitchforks and some hot lead.
There has to be a tipping point where enough is enough.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
