Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. gives Flight 93 site landowners one week to sell (Update #14, Nixed)
Philadelphia Inquirer ^ | 6/6/09 | Amy Worden

Posted on 06/06/2009 8:44:45 AM PDT by jimbo123

The federal government issued an ultimatum yesterday to people who own land designated for the Flight 93 memorial in Western Pennsylvania: They have one week to reach an agreement on the sale of their land or the government will initiate proceedings to seize it.

(Excerpt) Read more at philly.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: bho44; flight93memorial; landgrab; mecca; nixupdate14; notnixed; propertyrights; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: jimbo123
The Supreme Court voted for this kind of personal property grab by the government. It's called Kelo vs. New London. In effect, there really is no right to personal property anymore. Imho, one of the worst SC decisions ever.

The Supreme Court decision basically gives corrupt local and federal government officials carte blanche to steal. Government power on steroids.
21 posted on 06/06/2009 8:54:20 AM PDT by khnyny ("The demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
You missed this part:

SOMERSET, Pa. - The federal government will negotiate with landowners for one week in an attempt to get the property needed to build a Flight 93 memorial without using eminent domain, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said yesterday.

But if no agreement is reached by June 12, the government will seize the land.
22 posted on 06/06/2009 8:55:46 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
This is a time when thousands upon thousands of Americans need to unite and prevent the government from seizing this land.........
23 posted on 06/06/2009 8:55:56 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (zer0 is doing to capitalism what Kennedy did to health care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. (United States Constitution, Fifth Amendment).

I have no problem with the government condemning this property for use as a memorial which is clearly a public purpose providing there is just compensation. There is nothing in the article that indicates that the government does not intend to pay just compensation. These proceedings are initiated by a seizure, that is a notice of taking, if the parties cannot negotiate a settlement. The matter then proceeds to trial with experts on both sides presenting their arguments to the jury.

24 posted on 06/06/2009 8:55:58 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Never on my watch

The eminent domain threat was dropped only for one week! Salazar said if a deal isn’t done by the end of next week, he is going to take the land.


25 posted on 06/06/2009 8:56:50 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
America -- a great idea, didn't last.

26 posted on 06/06/2009 8:57:03 AM PDT by Clint Williams (Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | America -- a great idea, didn't last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: khnyny

Kelo is not the decision that would be used to enforce this taking. It does not conform closely enough. Actually if i were the landowners lawyer I would hope for the Feds to try and use Kelo - you could knock that down in the first rounds of motions.


27 posted on 06/06/2009 8:57:48 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit (Two terms for politicians, one in office, one in jail.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
That was yesterday, the article in question is dated today.

Looks like there are some conflicting stories out there

28 posted on 06/06/2009 8:58:14 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (zer0 is doing to capitalism what Kennedy did to health care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RC2
Sure does. The government has forgotten about that and will take what they want so they can build a monument to themselves. We don’t need a monument to remember. The owner can simply clear the land and leave natural. It’s his land and will know the best thing to do.

That, and maybe a small marker would be the best monument of all. There doesn't need to be anything else.

29 posted on 06/06/2009 8:58:25 AM PDT by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

All so Big Brother can build a nice, Islamic Crescent! Ain’t it great to live in a formerly free country!


30 posted on 06/06/2009 8:58:54 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron

Conflicting stories....indeed.


31 posted on 06/06/2009 8:59:05 AM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (FreeRepublic. Monthly Donors Wanted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Putting up memorials to 9-11 actully glorifies the terrorism, it is why the terrorists did it.

maybe the landowners dont want to see a memorial

32 posted on 06/06/2009 9:00:19 AM PDT by KTM rider (.......and the sheeple feebly bleated in protest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

So...US citizens get attacked by terrorists and the government solution is to take the land of more innocent US citizens?

WOW!


33 posted on 06/06/2009 9:00:28 AM PDT by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925; Foreigners 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

You’ve got that right


34 posted on 06/06/2009 9:00:32 AM PDT by mefistofelerevised
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer

35 posted on 06/06/2009 9:00:37 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

“Sort of defeats the purpose of what those people died for, doesn’t it?”

EXACTLY!


36 posted on 06/06/2009 9:01:15 AM PDT by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925; Foreigners 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

"Unfortunately there is one thing standing between me and that property - the rightful owners."

37 posted on 06/06/2009 9:02:05 AM PDT by dfwgator (USM is Gator Bait! (Congrats to U-Dub!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax
All so Big Brother can build a nice, Islamic Crescent!

Obama's muslim apology tour this week would be a failure if he doesn't get his "Crescent of Embrace" memorial to the 9/11 hijackers built in this field.
38 posted on 06/06/2009 9:02:45 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo
Conflicting stories....indeed.

Seems like this is always done, must be how they guage public reaction to "test the waters", so to speak.

39 posted on 06/06/2009 9:03:24 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (zer0 is doing to capitalism what Kennedy did to health care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer

Maybe Obummer will change it to the Hammer & Sickle.


40 posted on 06/06/2009 9:05:09 AM PDT by alice_in_bubbaland (Markets and Marxists Don't Mix! Smile you're on Janet's Candid Camera!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson