Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Releases Secret List of Nuclear Sites Accidentally
NYT ^ | June 2, 2009 | WILLIAM J. BROAD

Posted on 06/02/2009 6:23:20 PM PDT by balls

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 261-279 next last
To: Cindy

That was just my opinion after reading and looking at each page.......:o)

Stay safe !!


201 posted on 06/02/2009 11:37:37 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: sageb1
Who is Obama really working for?

Allah. And he was trained as an imam. That is who he is.

202 posted on 06/02/2009 11:56:05 PM PDT by MestaMachine (Will global warming make hell hotter? Or is hell freezing over? That is the ???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

bump for later.


203 posted on 06/02/2009 11:58:56 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (We either Free America ourselves, or it is midnight for humanity for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
"Nuclear weapons are the most dangerous legacies of the Cold War," Obama said in a speech in front of a huge crowd outside the medieval Prague Castle in the Czech Republic. "The U.S. will take concrete steps. ... We will begin the work of reducing our arsenals and stockpiles." - Barack Hussein Obama

Would concrete steps include making sensitive information available, which would stir public debate about nukes, perhaps ending in a government consensus that many of our nuclear sites and arsenals are obsolete now and can be closed or destroyed? Especially since their value as secret installations has now been compromised?

204 posted on 06/03/2009 12:41:49 AM PDT by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I didn’t know until a couple of days ago that the GITMO detainees have access to 5 cable TV channels including Al Jazeera in English, on which they can follow the debate about their own detention.


205 posted on 06/03/2009 12:43:18 AM PDT by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: balls

Read the coverup comment of Thomas Cochran of the leftist National Resources Defense Council. Cochran is one of that organizations farthest left anti-defense ideologues.

He knows damned well that this document is the perfect target list for anti-nuclear energy environmental extremists, not to mention that old kind of Jihadist terrorists, local-wackos, and other extremists.

Beware of guys like Cochran. He is a danger to society.


206 posted on 06/03/2009 12:43:30 AM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkcc30

“At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? By what means shall we fortify against it? Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant, to step the Ocean, and crush us at a blow? Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth in their military chest; with a Bonaparte for a commander, could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years. At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.”

- Abraham Lincoln


207 posted on 06/03/2009 1:25:50 AM PDT by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: balls

“Highly Confidential”? The US government has no such classification.


208 posted on 06/03/2009 1:37:53 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Hey, Obama! Where's my check?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balls

THIS govt does nothing by mistake


209 posted on 06/03/2009 2:36:20 AM PDT by SF_Redux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind
“Highly Confidential”? The US government has no such classification.

That was my first thought as well. I wonder if the document was prepared and marked properly in the first place? There may have been multiple felonies committed in the release of this information.

I reckon it wasn't CNWDI, but you'd have to believe it would be TS/SCI.

210 posted on 06/03/2009 3:24:54 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: balls
I woke up this morning to read this. And like most of the reactions on the thread I too was at first outraged and then went from no big deal, concerned, worried, too conspiracy.

BUT a careful reading of the article indicates this list was to be turned over the the UN IAEA. Now, what countries are on the IAEA? We were going to give this list to the UNITED NATIONS. AT a time when Iran is given the greenlight to create nuclear “energy” and N. Korea is playing with setting off nuclear bombs and Pakistan can't even begin to tell you where their nuclear sites are or whose control they are under?

I agree someone up thread said there is no such thing in government work that is “highly confidential.” It is either a state secret or not. Do folks have some idea these site are around, sure...civilians work there but they generally don't go blabbing their mouths off about it. See I am still outraged the list was posted on the GPO site, say internet.

But...trying to stay focused on the other hand...

The list was being set up to be given to the UNITED NATIONS. Yeah...right...they'll protect that information.

Can a junior senator really be this stupid? Focus not on what the “oops” is, because a few weeks from now it would be public knowledge anyway, but on the illogical reason we would turn state secrets over to an organization that holds no authority over us.

That is our talking point.

My thoughts and prayers go out to all the nukeworkers who guard, handle, and protect both our military and civilian nuclear facilities.

211 posted on 06/03/2009 3:28:25 AM PDT by EBH (I am not your comrade, nor sheeple, nor surf or slave; but a Freeman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tahoeblue; seekthetruth; All
Isn't that why they are getting the laptops and Internet training - so they can Googlemap the locations

Most likely a more sophisticated type of GPS.
There exists many other forms much more accurate than Goggle.

212 posted on 06/03/2009 3:36:34 AM PDT by katiekins1 (Obama=DickTater N Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: balls

D’oh!


213 posted on 06/03/2009 4:15:08 AM PDT by WayneS (with apologies to the writers of the Simpsons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balls

Gorge W. Bush’s fault... Right?

;^)


214 posted on 06/03/2009 4:15:52 AM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katiekins1
That's A$$-hat in Chief to YOU, buster!

;^)

215 posted on 06/03/2009 4:17:31 AM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: balls

This administration is beyond INEPT....


216 posted on 06/03/2009 4:18:10 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified DeCartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

International banking families, the Illuminati, Satan, etc.....

Take your pick.


217 posted on 06/03/2009 4:19:19 AM PDT by wolfcreek (KMTA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Obama is the CIC. He IS the defense department.


218 posted on 06/03/2009 4:19:26 AM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

“Who is Obama really working for?”

It’s not for the American people.....


219 posted on 06/03/2009 4:19:42 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified DeCartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: balls

Yup, we are much safer with *O* in charge!......../sarc


220 posted on 06/03/2009 4:23:06 AM PDT by tiredoflaundry (I will not be silenced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 261-279 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson