Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fresh Wind
“Highly Confidential”? The US government has no such classification.

That was my first thought as well. I wonder if the document was prepared and marked properly in the first place? There may have been multiple felonies committed in the release of this information.

I reckon it wasn't CNWDI, but you'd have to believe it would be TS/SCI.

210 posted on 06/03/2009 3:24:54 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]


To: mvpel

“Highly Confidential Safeguards Sensitive”

Don’t forget UCNI


226 posted on 06/03/2009 5:31:09 AM PDT by satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel

I think it’s IAEA.


234 posted on 06/03/2009 6:03:31 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel

From p. 1 of the pdf link posted:
“The IAEA classification of the enclosed declaration is ‘‘Highly Confidential Safeguards Sensitive’’; however, the United States regards this information as ‘‘Sensitive but Unclassified.’’

Nonetheless, under Public Law 109–401, information reported to, or otherwise acquired by, the United States Government under this title or under the U.S.-IAEA Additional Protocol shall be exempt from disclosure under section 552 of title 5, United States Code.”

So “highly confidential” is an IAEA classification. Technically, the material WAS NOT classified according to US standards (as a previous poster stated 100 comments ago). But I don’t know the meaning of the last paragraph above. Does “exempt from disclosure” mean that it’s OK or NOT OK to publish the material? The fact that GPO pulled it after NYT inquired suggests somebody goofed, but this looks like a bureaucratic snafu rather than WH-orchestrated leak.

The title page states: MESSAGE FROM
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
TRANSMITTING
A LIST OF THE SITES, LOCATIONS, FACILITIES, AND ACTIVITIES
IN THE UNITED STATES DECLARED TO THE INTERNATIONAL
ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY (IAEA), UNDER THE PROTOCOL ADDITIONAL
TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA AND THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY
FOR THE APPLICATION OF SAFEGUARDS IN THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA, WITH ANNEXES, AS REQUIRED BY SECTION
271 OF PUBLIC LAW 109–401

MAY 6, 2009.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the
Committee on Foreign Affairs and ordered to be printed

I think transmittals of this sort are routinely printed (indeed the authorizing statute may require this). The 109th Congress was in session from 2005-2006, so my guess is that this list has been issued annually ever since. Whether it’s been openly printed in the past is another matter.


235 posted on 06/03/2009 6:06:25 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

To: mvpel; Fresh Wind
I reckon it wasn't CNWDI, but you'd have to believe it would be TS/SCI.

I very seriously doubt it would have been SCI. I'm thinking it would have been somewhere in the SECRET//NOFORN with caveats type range.
273 posted on 06/03/2009 2:04:33 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (Fides et Audax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson