Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama condemns Muslim attack on Arkansas Army recruiters...not! (Michelle Malkin)
Michelle Malkin Website ^ | June 2, 2009 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 06/02/2009 2:44:13 PM PDT by Syncro

Obama condemns Muslim attack on Arkansas Army recruiters…not

By Michelle Malkin  •  June 2, 2009 12:47 PM

President Obama announced his choice for Army Secretary this afternoon.

The news isn’t what he said in his statement about GOP Rep. John McHugh:

“As Secretary of the Army, he will ensure that our soldiers are trained and equipped to meet the full spectrum of challenges and threats of our time. And John [McHugh] shares my belief that a sustainable national security strategy must include a bipartisan consensus at home, and he brings patriotism and a pragmatism that has won him respect on both sides of the aisle. I look forward to working with him in the months and years ahead.”

The news is what he left out.

Not a word about the jihadi attack on the two Army recruiters in Arkansas. No condemnation of the heinous attack and senseless violence. No condolences for the families of the targeted men or praise for the military recruiters who have been under increasing attack on U.S. soil. No statements from the DOJ or Pentagon, either.

Nothing.

***

Jeffrey Goldberg at the Atlantic notices similar whitewashing by government-funded NPR, which failed to report the name and religion of recruiter-murdering suspect Abdul Hakim Mujahid Muhammad:

Why not tell people what is actually happening in the world? We saw this a couple of weeks ago, when the press only gingerly acknowledged that the malevolent though incompetent suspects in the synagogue bombing-conspiracy case in New York were converts to Islam. How is the public served by this kind of silence? The extremist Christian beliefs of George Tiller’s alleged murderer are certainly relevant to that case, and no one in my profession is hesitant to discuss them. Why the hesitancy to talk about the motivations of the man who allegedly killed Pvt. William Long?

Amy Ridenour: Some murders matter more than others.



TOPICS: US: Arkansas
KEYWORDS: agenda; armyrecruiters; armysecretary; bho44; bhodod; blackmuslims; bledsoe; crushislam; democrats; dhimmicrats; doj; fubo; islam; islamicagenda; islamicextremism; islamicterrorism; jihadiattack; johnmchugh; murder; muslimattack; muslims; npr; obama; ogoatse; pentagon; recruiter; terrorism; tiller; troops
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Maybe if they ignore it, it didn't happen.

Murder of Military personel, crickets

Murder of baby killer, how horrorendous!

1 posted on 06/02/2009 2:44:13 PM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Syncro

I suggest that all FReepers write to the White House and ask a question about this.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/CONTACT/


2 posted on 06/02/2009 2:46:42 PM PDT by savedbygrace (You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

It is totally the response we expected, though. He hates
the military and loves killing the unborn!


3 posted on 06/02/2009 2:47:19 PM PDT by luvie (Zero is dumb as a rock (dangerously so))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

“Well, then, get away from the fear. Don’t fear the terrorists. They’re mothers and fathers.”


4 posted on 06/02/2009 2:47:35 PM PDT by FTJM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

“a sustainable national security strategy must include a bipartisan consensus at home”

I hope it’s more about winning a war and not trying to make friends with the left. Otherwise those are weasel words.


5 posted on 06/02/2009 2:52:18 PM PDT by swheats (Time is still the greatest equalizer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
Why the hesitancy to talk about the motivations of the man who allegedly killed Pvt. William Long?

Uhhh, maybe because they agree with the motivations? Ergo, it's not news.

6 posted on 06/02/2009 2:57:12 PM PDT by kromike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
Notice the difference in treatment between a killing that advances The Agenda - Tiller's - and one that does not. That's all that's going on here. One can be used to demonize political opponents, one cannot. One is a stage from which the usual sanctimonious hectoring can be done, one isn't.

And one - Long's - reminds us that Bush's post-9/11 record is now better than 0bama's in terms of attacks on U.S. soil. And that's the thing that's spiking the story.

7 posted on 06/02/2009 3:02:33 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Barry and the Barry controlled media groupies are in Arab-Muslim appeasement mode.


8 posted on 06/02/2009 3:03:00 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

The bottom line who wants a leader... a CIC that only acts on his politics?


9 posted on 06/02/2009 3:06:26 PM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

All that will happen is that the terrorists are going to be encouraged by this silence.


10 posted on 06/02/2009 3:07:49 PM PDT by rom (Obama '12 slogan: Let's keep on hopin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Great way for the commander in chief to stand behind and support his men. Even he couldn’t have sincerely worked up the outrage he felt over Dr. Tiller’s murder, at least a public word of sympathy would have been the decent and prudent reaction to the very public domestic murder of one of his soldiers. Nothing President Obama has done or not done so far has outraged me so much as his callous silence in this case.


11 posted on 06/02/2009 3:08:30 PM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

‘Why not tell people what is actually happening in the world?’

Perhaps the name Hussein suggests an answer to that question.


12 posted on 06/02/2009 3:08:46 PM PDT by Jack Hammer (here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Notice the difference in treatment between a killing that advances The Agenda - Tiller's - and one that does not.

That's all that's going on here.

One can be used to demonize political opponents, one cannot.

Yes that is it in an ACORN nut-shell.
13 posted on 06/02/2009 3:09:39 PM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Maybe BHO isn’t back from his night out yet.


14 posted on 06/02/2009 3:12:34 PM PDT by Rappini ("Pro deo et Patria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Question here: Is there any legal reason why Armed Forces personnel on duty at recruiting offices can not wear side-arms? I know I’ve seen MP’s and SP’s wearing them but just can’t remember if it was stateside or foreign.


15 posted on 06/02/2009 3:13:01 PM PDT by navyblue (<u>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: navyblue
"Question here: Is there any legal reason why Armed Forces personnel on duty at recruiting offices can not wear side-arms?

Legal reason? No. But, it can be a logistical nightmare for a dozen reasons. First and foremost, you have to have a very secure place to store the weapons. That "place" has to be wired for an alarm, and it's an alarm system with some very specific and expensive minimums.

There are many, many more problems that are just to detailed to go into here. But, as a retired Marine Corps officer, with independent duty experience where we were required to have access to weapons, I can promise you that it's logistically and practically infeasible to have all our recruiting stations armed. It would just cause more problems than it would fix, IMHO.

16 posted on 06/02/2009 3:22:11 PM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: navyblue
They can be armed, no problem. Without being deputized or requested by a state governor, they can't engage in law enforcement activities (though MPs can enforce UCMJ for other servicemen of course), but they can be armed for self defense. Whether the army actually wants every fresh private on leave carrying sidearms around is a different matter. Generally not (not supervised, often quite young, only recently in the service etc). (These guys were privates talking about their experience in the service with prospective recruits). The professional recruiters could easily be armed though.
17 posted on 06/02/2009 3:23:26 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
Does anyone know of a link that provides a transcript of the daily White House briefing? From what I understand, the Bush administration used to publish this on whitehouse.gov, but the Obama administration has stopped this practice.

We know that Obama hasn't issued a statement, but I would be very curious if any members of our "4th estate" have asked the question.

18 posted on 06/02/2009 3:24:19 PM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

I wouldn’t dare contact the White House. I’m so mad I could spit nails.

We’re a military family.........


19 posted on 06/02/2009 3:25:21 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("There is no insanity greater than electing a pathological Narcissist as president.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
Not a word about the jihadi attack on the two Army recruiters in Arkansas. No condemnation of the heinous attack and senseless violence. No condolences for the families of the targeted men or praise for the military recruiters who have been under increasing attack on U.S. soil. No statements from the DOJ or Pentagon, either. Nothing. Jeffrey Goldberg at the Atlantic notices similar whitewashing by government-funded NPR, which failed to report the name and religion of recruiter-murdering suspect Abdul Hakim Mujahid Muhammad

20 posted on 06/02/2009 3:28:14 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson