Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Casey: Army would have to ‘shift gears’ for N. Korea battle
Stars and Stripes ^ | May 30, 2009 | Jeff Schogol

Posted on 05/28/2009 5:34:54 PM PDT by xzins

WASHIGTON – It would take the Army time to "shift gears" if it needed to fight against North Korea, Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey said Thursday.

Right now, the Army is focused on the counterinsurgency efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan, but North Korea’s recent saber rattling has raised the prospect that the Army might be called upon to fight a conventional war.

"I have said publicly for some time that if we had to shift gears, it would probably take us about 90 days or so to shift our gears and to train the folks up that were preparing to go to Iraq and Afghanistan to go someplace else," Casey said after a speech at a Washington think tank.

That doesn’t mean that it would take at least 90 days to send reinforcements to U.S. troops in South Korea, Casey said.

"We would move forces as rapidly as we could get them prepared," he said.

Casey declined to say how fast the Army could mobilize to meet a threat from North Korea, but he stressed the Army is "combat seasoned" and can move quickly.

"The mechanical skills of artillery gunnery and tank gunnery come back very, very quickly," he said. "The harder part is the integration — that really brigade level and above of massing fires and effects in a very constricted period of time as opposed to what you do in a counterinsurgency over a much longer extended period of time."

Looking to the future, Casey said he expects conflicts this century to look a lot like the U.S.-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as the Israeli war with Hezbollah in 2006.

Regarding the latter, Casey noted that the key lesson the Israelis learned was that they were too focused on irregular warfare.

"They were working so much in the West Bank and conducting counterinsurgency-like operations that they lost their combined arms skills, the ability to integrate fires in air and tanks and artillery," he said.

The U.S. Army needs to be prepared for the "full spectrum" operations ranging from offensive, defensive and stability operations, he said.

Casey expressed confidence that the U.S. Army can fight and win a conventional war against North Korea given its experience in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"I’m not afraid of putting this force in the field against anybody," he said.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: army; bhoasia; georgecasey; korea; northkorea; saberrattling; testingobama; usarmy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last

1 posted on 05/28/2009 5:34:54 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xzins

What makes Casey think 2009 will be a repeat of 1951-1953? It might look more like August 1945.


2 posted on 05/28/2009 5:36:20 PM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
90 days? We wouldn't have 90 minutes to defend Seoul.
3 posted on 05/28/2009 5:37:28 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Are the SK’s gonna join the fight or is this one all ours?


4 posted on 05/28/2009 5:37:58 PM PDT by randog (Tap into America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

You don’t have shift any gears if you use the right weapon!


5 posted on 05/28/2009 5:38:04 PM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

NK would shoot first and could take the capital in a day.


6 posted on 05/28/2009 5:38:51 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...

What kind of naval assets do we have in the vicinity? Unleashing UAVs on the Pyongyang dictatorship would slow ‘em down some.


7 posted on 05/28/2009 5:38:53 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Which is why this should be a WMD war.


8 posted on 05/28/2009 5:39:38 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain, Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Well Obambi, you may get an object lesson why those F22s are more needed than you thought.

North Korea would probably have some help from other nations.


9 posted on 05/28/2009 5:40:15 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama is mentally a child of ten. Just remember that when he makes statements and issues policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

There’s not that much that can be done about Seoul. It’d be flattened to the ground in a day. The commies have so much arty in range there wouldn’t be two rocks standing on top of each other within a day or two. But they couldn’t move in south. That border is one of the most well defended ones.


10 posted on 05/28/2009 5:40:45 PM PDT by farlander (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232
Right weapon?
11 posted on 05/28/2009 5:40:50 PM PDT by GSP.FAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xzins

If we are not prepared to use any and all weapons we have available, we might as well stay home and this president will not use what we have.


12 posted on 05/28/2009 5:41:32 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (32 shopping days to Graybeard58's 64th. b/day. Selah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
"90 days? We wouldn't have 90 minutes to defend Seoul.

Yeah. That comment didn't inspire a lot of confidence in Casey, at least with me.

I think another altercation with the PRNK would be lightening fast and super bloody. They don't have the resources to get into a protracted engagement, even if they wanted too. It would have to be all-in from the get-go. I suppose it's tough to a active-duty Army officer to put it that starkly.

13 posted on 05/28/2009 5:41:34 PM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

You have a point there. My cousin serves close to the DMZ and from what he “mentioned” to me, the logistics and supply chain have been prepped and studied for a long time which every scenario has been reviewed repeatedly. After Iraq, the commanders there dont want a cluster-f.


14 posted on 05/28/2009 5:42:40 PM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

A massive provision of WMD ordinance would be about the only prevention of that, that I can think of.

You’d have to take out a lot of artillery and possible missile silos (or the equivalent).

It would have to be done almost across the whole southern end of NK, in one moment to prevent it.


15 posted on 05/28/2009 5:44:35 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama is mentally a child of ten. Just remember that when he makes statements and issues policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel
Exactly. Moving forces in would be a tragic mistake as we'd just be sending in hostages. Send in our support ballistically.
16 posted on 05/28/2009 5:44:49 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Tyranny is always whimsical." Mark Steyn 3/9/2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins

This is all BS. Just move the USS Ronald Reagan and the USS GHW Bush over there and N. Korea would be turned into a parking lot in a day and a half.
It’s too bad our current CiC doesn’t have the balls to defend us. He will send the hildabeast over to talk.


17 posted on 05/28/2009 5:45:21 PM PDT by taillightchaser (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

The South Koreans have been buying a lot of smart weapons. The North Korean military is still largely equipped with 1970’s-era weaponry, and their training is pathetic. Seoul would be flattened, but the North would be toast.


18 posted on 05/28/2009 5:45:55 PM PDT by GL of Sector 2814 (One man's "magic" is another man's engineering. "Supernatural" is a null word. -- R A Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big_Monkey

What’s their mechanized look like? Could they storm in with tanks or military vehicles? It seems like we could mow down a major portion of the attackers, if they just stormed in.


19 posted on 05/28/2009 5:46:40 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama is mentally a child of ten. Just remember that when he makes statements and issues policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

You believe that our boy (no gonads) president would be willing to nuke anybody? Sorry, ain’t gonna’ happen. ;-)


20 posted on 05/28/2009 5:48:42 PM PDT by doc1019 (Without White Liberal Guilt, Obama would just be another worthless Congress critter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson