Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurker
"90 days? We wouldn't have 90 minutes to defend Seoul.

Yeah. That comment didn't inspire a lot of confidence in Casey, at least with me.

I think another altercation with the PRNK would be lightening fast and super bloody. They don't have the resources to get into a protracted engagement, even if they wanted too. It would have to be all-in from the get-go. I suppose it's tough to a active-duty Army officer to put it that starkly.

13 posted on 05/28/2009 5:41:34 PM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Big_Monkey

What’s their mechanized look like? Could they storm in with tanks or military vehicles? It seems like we could mow down a major portion of the attackers, if they just stormed in.


19 posted on 05/28/2009 5:46:40 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Obama is mentally a child of ten. Just remember that when he makes statements and issues policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Big_Monkey

Well if we stop sending them food they’d be in a pinch real quick. People forget that we’re feeding them. They don’t have the land and resources to farm for their people.


121 posted on 05/28/2009 7:26:04 PM PDT by Bogey78O (Don't call them jihadis. Call them irhabis. Tick them off, don't entertain their delusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Big_Monkey

We would have to use tactical nukes on the N.Korean forces to stop their artillery strikes and advances over the DMZ, and a strategic nuke on Pyongyang, or most of South Korea will be damaged.


130 posted on 05/28/2009 7:37:01 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson