As long as he's surfing here he can mention this too!
Thanks a million, Bill, for picking that quote instead of the many quotes of substance.
In the light of Justice Ruth’s pancreatic cancer.....it’s a legitimate concern. Shut up, Bill.
In fact....I seriously doubt ol’ Bill even scans these boards. He’ll have some researcher ‘do the work’ for him.....who is more than likely a young, fresh-faced lib. The info may be ‘fed’ to him.
As long as he's surfing here he can mention this too!
reminder to GOP president taking office in 2013.
Do not nominate anyone to the SCOTUS who is 55 years old and has type I diabetes.
He’s a smug one.
At least he’s reading here.
Bill O’Reilly is not honest and will not be on in this house!
I wish EVERY Freeper would make sure their TV is on FOX during the Glenn Beck hour...even if you can’t watch the show. I want to see Glenn Beck’s numbers grow and surpass O’Reilly’s. Then maybe FOX will switch their time slots and put Glenn in a prime time slot!
O has been gunning for us for years. He wants to look balanced and to do so he has to find someone on the right to counter the KOS. He is a hack and will always be a hack.
He said FR was the worst Far right sight...or something close to that!! he is STUPID.
How many DUmmies mentioned Cheney’s heart problems over the years?
What a rip off, why don’t you go crawl into bed with President Obama Mr. O’Reilly. As if he needed anymore media people kissing his rear. Why mock those that stand against liberalism? Are you a liberal Mr. O’Reilly? After hearing about this crap, I’m starting to think you are.
Liberals would like to pretend that we only differ on insubstantial political issues and that I should recognize that they mean well.
That is nonsense. I wish ill to all baby-killing gun-grabbers everywhere.
I hate to see conservatives behaving like liberals. When BOR exposed an asinine post on this site, scores of FReepers made hateful BOR posts and allowed the idiot who made the post to skate.
Instead of taking the offending poster to task, a good many of you knuckleheads adopted the age-old liberal tactic of shooting the messenger. So, the initial poster made us look bad, and then a bunch of thin-skinned conservatives got in a snit because we got called on it. What’s to keep a liberal troublemaker from registering and posing as a conservative just for the purpose of posting things that make us look bad? They’ve already seen that many FReepers will allow a hateful comment like that to stand and then behave like sharks in a feeding frenzy when someone exposes them.
If we as FReepers would self police, then BOR and others would have no reason to come here and lift disgusting posts to air on TV. If those kinds of posts were met with rebukes, there would be nothing to report. How about taking a little responsibility for the decorum of this board?
And yes, we went in to this last election with the court probably 1 vote shy of over turning many evils.
Is anybody suggesting that I should be hoping and praying for these liberal judges to live long and prosper? Goes with out saying that I pray for God to change the liberal justices hearts, just as I pray for Obama to come to Christ. Unfortunately I do not see that happening, but all things are possible through Christ.
Yes wouldn`t it be terrible if all the liberal justices became ill (heavy sarcasm) not sure I could go on, I would be to broken up
I saw BOR and I think I saw this post last night. I could be wrong but I took the post to be a slap back at Wanda Sykes 'joke' about Rush Limbaugh having kidney failure. 0bama sure thought that was funny so I guess he's every bit as hateful as any FReeper is.
Have you read FR's disclaimer, Bill? Let me show you an excerpt from FR's disclaimer:
"Opinions expressed on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Free Republic or its operators."Free Republic does not advocate or condone racism, violence, rebellion, secession, or an overthrow of the government. Free Republic advocates a return to constitutionally limited government, reserving all government powers not expressly delegated by the constitution to the United States to the States respectively, or the people, emphasizing sovereign state governments, local government, self-government and self-rule, while restricting government powers to only those enumerated in the constitution and maximizing individual rights and liberty as originally envisioned and established by our Founding Fathers and secured and defended by the blood of patriots and statesmen for over two hundred years."
Get that, Bill? We, the majority of Freepers, oppose Sonia Sotomayor not because of her ethnicity, background, or sex - that's is a ruse being used by Obama, the left, and the useful idiots on the right to obfuscate the real issue at hand, which is that Sonia Sotomayor isn't fit to sit on the Supreme Court due to her lack of judicial qualifications.
She is an advocate for a leftist social agenda, and she has publicly said that she considers her role as a jurist not as an impartial arbiter of the law but as a vehicle to make policy. The opposition to her nomination on FR, for the most part, is based on her disregard for the Constitution and the principled rule of law. It is the same disregard Obama has shown for the Constitution and the Founding Fathers. Do your homework, Bill, do some research.
Where were you during the lynching of Miguel Estrada, Alberto Gonzalez, and Clarence Thomas by the Democrats and the liberal media? How come at the time, no one was particularly concerned about the liberals offending blacks and Hispanics?
You picked one comment by one individual to trash a conservative website with thousands of members!
The opposition to Sonia Sotomayor on FR isn't based on race, sex, her background, and other non substantive matters, but based on concerns for her liberal, activist world view, and also because of the fact that she has been overturned by the Supreme Court over 60% of the time in cases that reached the court, and was even reprimanded in writing by a Clinton appointee for lacking constitutional standing for a decision.
For Obama and his lackeys, growing up poor and somehow making it to Yale or Harvard makes a "compelling story." Big deal! Being a Hispanic or black is a "compelling story," and being a community organizer or a community thug is a "compelling story," too. The media hacks salivate at this notion, instead of doing an honest research and finding out the facts. Instead, commentators like Bill O'Reilly take one post out of thousands on a conservative forum to make their point. Dreadful!
And why not, it's a good point.Date: May 26th, 2009 8:41 AM
Author: Five Hundy by Midnight
She has diabetes? That's a bad choice then -- takes about 10 years off your life on average.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1005859&forum_id=2#11824497)
LINK: Smear: Bill O’Reilly Takes Silly Hot Air Comment And Calls It “Blog Posting”
I wonder if his show has someone signed up to make comments here that he can use on his show?