Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libertarians blast Sotomayor pick
The Libertarian Party ^ | 5/26/09 | The Libertarian Party

Posted on 05/26/2009 9:40:55 AM PDT by VirginiaConstitutionalist

Libertarians blast Sotomayor pick
Obama Court nominee ruled government should discriminate based on race

WASHINGTON -- America’s third largest party Tuesday criticized President Barack Obama’s nomination of federal appeals court judge Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, citing past rulings that public employers should discriminate in hiring based on race.

“While Judge Sotomayor deserves a fair and impartial hearing, Supreme Court justices should be nominated for their thorough knowledge of and adherence to the Constitution and the rule of law,” said William Redpath, Libertarian National Committee Chairman.

“By nominating Sonia Sotomayor, Barack Obama has made it clear he prefers an activist for his personal causes over a rational interpreter of law,” said Redpath.

According to Cato Institute Vice President for Legal Affairs Roger Pilon, Sotomayor is “the most radical of all the frequently mentioned candidates before him.”

Sotomayor is best known for the Ricci v. DeStafano case, in which the New Haven, Conn. fire department decided it didn’t like the results of an officers promotion exam in which whites and Hispanic firefighters outperformed black firefighters. The city threw out the results of the exam, denying several firefighters promotions solely because of their race. The firefighters sued the city, claiming racial discrimination under Title VVI of the Civil Rights Act and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The Cato Institute, Reason Foundation and the Individual Rights Foundations filed briefs on behalf of the firefighters, citing the absurdity of allowing public employers to throw out the results of valid, race-neutral exams that produce racial disparity because the racial disparity produced wasn’t politically correct. The firefighters and the libertarian foundations filing briefs argued that public employment practices should be color-blind.

Sotomayor disagreed, ruling the city has a right to discriminate against white and Hispanic public employees to construct a politically correct racial mix in hiring, even if it goes against the results of a racially-neutral competency exam.

The case is now before the Supreme Court. Sotomayor has had her rulings thrown out by the court a troubling four times. In three of those cases, the Court ruled Sotomayor had incorrectly interpreted the law.

“It is troubling that Obama, who won the highest elected office in the world without racial preferences, would nominate someone who openly admits the government should racially discriminate against its own citizens to serve the needs of political correctness,” said Redpath.

“Libertarians believe that, while the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of association allows private parties to hire whomever they please, government has no right to discriminate. Public employers should treat all citizens of all colors, races and ethnicities with equal respect and value and Sotomayor’s radical rulings are a jarring departure from that principle.”

For more information on this issue, or to arrange an interview with the Libertarian Party, please call Director of Communications Donny Ferguson at 703-200-3669 or 202-333-0008, x. 225, or email Donny.Ferguson@lp.org.

The Libertarian Party is America's third-largest political party, founded in 1971 as an alternative to the two main political parties. You can find more information on the Libertarian Party by visiting http://www.LP.org. The Libertarian Party proudly stands for smaller government, lower taxes and more freedom.

# # #


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: libertarian; lp; lping; scotus; sotomayor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: VirginiaConstitutionalist

She and Obama seem to agree with a lot of liberatian positions though, so it is a mixed bag for the Libertarians.

Libertarian Party Platform:

Throw open the borders completely; only a rare individual (terrorist, disease carrier etc.) can be kept from freedom of movement through “political borders”.

Homosexuals; total freedom in the military, gay marriage, adoption, child custody and everything else.

Abortion; zero restrictions or impediments.

Pornography; no restraint, no restrictions.

Drugs; Meth, Heroin, Crack, anything new that science can come up with, zero restrictions.

Advertising drugs, prostitution, pornography; zero restrictions.

Military Strength; minimal capabilities.


21 posted on 05/26/2009 9:57:47 AM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VirginiaConstitutionalist
“It is troubling that Obama, who won the highest elected office in the world without racial preferences, would nominate someone who openly admits the government should racially discriminate against its own citizens to serve the needs of political correctness,” said Redpath.

I thought Obama won precisely BECAUSE he is black....not despite being black.

22 posted on 05/26/2009 10:01:25 AM PDT by Aria ( "The US republic will endure until Congress discovers it can bribe the public with the people's $.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
"...Supreme Court justices should be nominated for their thorough knowledge of and adherence to the Constitution and the rule of law,”

WOW...what a concept! Too bad you don't hear many republicans state this fact (other than Rep. Ron Paul, I guess).

23 posted on 05/26/2009 10:03:35 AM PDT by ChrisInAR (The Tenth Amendment is still the Supreme Law of the Land, folks -- start enforcing it for a CHANGE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Government is bound to “Title VVI of the Civil Rights Act and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Libertarians believe that private people shouldn’t be bound to these since they must pay the penalty for whomever they hire. If I choose to not serve women in my restaurant, I’ll lose business and suffer economic consequences for that decision. If I choose to not hire any black people on my basketball team, generally the team I make would most likely suffer in terms of winning due to that decision. Governments typically don’t face the same market forces; they can discriminate as they please unless bound by law.


24 posted on 05/26/2009 10:06:30 AM PDT by In veno, veritas (Please identify my Ad Hominem attacks. I should be debating ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998
I agree. The reports I have seen show her NOT to be the favorite of the left. Whoever gets the appointment its still going to be a liberal and from what I have seen she appears to be the least damaging. Homing in on this one PC case does not tell the entire story.She upheld the Bush administrations right to prohibit pro-abortion information to foreign locations by ruling against a pro-abortion group that challenged administration policy. Further she stated the following with respect to the constitution:
At her Senate confirmation hearing more than a decade ago, she said, “I don't believe we should bend the Constitution under any circumstance. It says what it says. We should do honor to it.”
25 posted on 05/26/2009 10:07:11 AM PDT by WilliamPatrick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

I would say that the Libertarians are the larger of the 2.


26 posted on 05/26/2009 10:07:40 AM PDT by ChrisInAR (The Tenth Amendment is still the Supreme Law of the Land, folks -- start enforcing it for a CHANGE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99
"Better an “empty skirt” like this than a leading liberal intellectual force that might be able to persuade Kennedy to join the dark side of the force."

I agree. We could've gotten much worse. This is not the battle to risk everything for.

27 posted on 05/26/2009 10:09:15 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: VirginiaConstitutionalist; Clintonfatigued; Impy; Clemenza; AuH2ORepublican; BlackElk; ...

This might all be a set-up. The False Messiah knows this lady is a moron and a disgrace to the bench and can be (with enough opposition) defeated, he can then use her defeat to bludgeon Republicans with being both anti-Hispanic and anti-female, and then he’ll put up his true choice for the bench who will be even more dangerous.


28 posted on 05/26/2009 10:09:54 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Very true. How very little is known of the real positions of the Libertarian Party.


29 posted on 05/26/2009 10:11:11 AM PDT by WilliamPatrick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Russ
"There are at least 51 members of the senate who agree with her. I see an obligatory couple days of huffing and puffing by the so-called “conservative Republicans” in the senate and, then, they will head for the tall grass and capitulate as Obama expects them to do."

My good Senator Jeff Sessions, the most conservative in the land, who fought the good fight against Amnesty, already telegraphed the above to you when he said that he wouldn't vote against a candidate based solely on her being a lesbian.

Why?

Because Sotomayor is not as liberal as 0bama's other potential choices.

Defeat her in the Senate and 0bama will stick us with someone much worse.

30 posted on 05/26/2009 10:16:07 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: VirginiaConstitutionalist

Libertarians blast Sotomayor pick.

Should read:

Libertarians tippy-toe out of the middle of the road to blast Sotomayor pick, then tippy-toe back.


31 posted on 05/26/2009 10:19:40 AM PDT by alarm rider (Any country that tells you what light bulb to use is not a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: In veno, veritas
Government is bound to “Title VVI of the Civil Rights Act and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”

I see. The Libertarian party supports the Civil Rights Act.

So how about those parts of it that limit individual rights to discriminate?

32 posted on 05/26/2009 10:22:14 AM PDT by Mojave (Don't blame me. I voted for McClintock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: VirginiaConstitutionalist
“While Judge Sotomayor deserves a fair and impartial hearing, Supreme Court justices should be nominated for their thorough knowledge of and adherence to the Constitution and the rule of law,” said William Redpath, Libertarian National Committee Chairman.

As the National Committee Chairman of America's Independent Party, the third largest party in America based on voter registration, I concur heartily in this statement from my Libertarian counterpart.

33 posted on 05/26/2009 10:25:11 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (The box is broke. You don't have any choice now but to think outside of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VirginiaConstitutionalist; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; ...



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
(View past Libertarian pings here)
34 posted on 05/26/2009 10:37:14 AM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aria

They just say he is black, He is half white, 44% ARAB and 6% black.


35 posted on 05/26/2009 10:42:08 AM PDT by Danae (Amerikan Unity My Ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Southack

“She also has diabetes, so she won’t outlive Ginsburg.”

My MIL has diabetes; she is 83.

My grandmother had diabetes; she lived to 95.


36 posted on 05/26/2009 10:52:12 AM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore
>> OT, but both the Libertarian Party and the Constitution Party claim to be the third largest political party in the U.S. Who is telling the truth, and what exactly are they going by to get to their claim of being the third largest political party in the U.S.? <<

If you go by number of candidates on the ballot every election, the Libertarian Party is the third largest political party in the U.S. If you go by number of registered party members, the Constitution Party is the third largest party in the U.S. If you go by total number of votes received every election, the Green Party is the third largest political party in the U.S. ...

37 posted on 05/26/2009 11:09:46 AM PDT by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ex91B10

Oh PLEASE! She will be in for sure!! She’s a DEMOCRAT WOMEN who looks like Hugo Chavez!


38 posted on 05/26/2009 11:11:07 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
Did you read the rest of the post? Notice I stated “Government is bound.” The rest of the post was to explain Libertarian logic on why people shouldn't be.
39 posted on 05/26/2009 12:11:59 PM PDT by In veno, veritas (Please identify my Ad Hominem attacks. I should be debating ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Yes... you could be right ...
But regardless.... we need to oppose anyone who is extreme that he chooses
40 posted on 05/26/2009 12:16:38 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson