Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Telling Poll
Contentions, Commentary Blog ^ | May 20, 2009 | Jennifer Rubin

Posted on 05/21/2009 8:12:43 PM PDT by rmlew

A friend sent on an interesting poll by McLaughlin & Associates on a number of key foreign policy issues. It can be viewed in its entirety here. Several items on terrorism, Iran, and Israel stand out.

First, while “terrorism” is identified as the greatest threat to the U.S. only 15% give that answer. The next highest (excluding “don’t know”) is 7% as “ourselves.” Sigh. (But perhaps 7% of those polled thinking we’re the biggest threat is indeed a threat.) On Iran, overwhelming percentages of respondents across both parties think “Iran supplying a nuclear umbrella for terrorists” is a very serious or somewhat serious threat while a high (but smaller) percentage thinks the U.S. would not be safe with a nuclear-armed Iran. 79% think Iran would give nuclear weapons to terrorists to attack an American city.

On Israel, Bibi Netanyahu’s approval ratings are not stellar but still more positive than not, regardless of the respondent’s political party. And 87% of Republicans and 79% of Democrats think the U.S. should be concerned with Israel’s security. Perhaps the most interesting response comes to this question: “Given that Iran has publicly threatened to annihilate Israel, would Israel be justified in attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities?” 67% of Republicans, 47% of Democrats and 57% of Independents answer “yes.” That’s a rather startling and wide gap according to party identification, far wider than the gap regarding the generic “should we care about Israel’s security” query.

But Americans are a skeptical lot, it seems. Asked “Do you think that if the Palestinians were given their own state in the West Bank and Gaza they would live peacefully with Israel or continue their campaign of terror to destroy Israel?” only 18% choose “live peacefully” (with only 7% of Republicans choosing “live peacefully” over “destroy Israel” while the Democrats’ split was far closer, 25-47%).

The bottom line: Americans are “not naive,” as the president likes to say, about Iran and are very supportive of Israel. As to the former, given the level of concern about an attack on a U.S. city, a policy that seemed to tolerate Iranian possession of nuclear weapons would be very unpopular. Finally, the difference along party lines with regard to Israel is noteworthy and troubling (at least to those who believe a robust relationship between the two countries is in their mutual interests), especially at a time when Democrats dominate both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; israel; polling; preemptivestrike; wot
Wow.
I strongly suggest that readers check out the actual polling data at
http://www.mclaughlinonline.com/lib/sitefiles/National_Terrorism_Memo_0509.pdf
1 posted on 05/21/2009 8:12:43 PM PDT by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson; dennisw; Alouette

It seems taht even the average Democrat is smarter than Obama.


2 posted on 05/21/2009 8:13:42 PM PDT by rmlew ( The SAVE and GIVE acts are institutioning Corvee. Where's the outtrage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
the difference along party lines with regard to Israel is noteworthy and troubling

I agree on both counts. However, if the majority of Jews in this country vote Democrat, and apparently they do, it is entirely logical to assume that non-Jewish Democrats are also going to have little concern for Israel's security. Says little for the reasoning powers of the average leftie.

3 posted on 05/21/2009 8:35:12 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
The next highest (excluding “don’t know”) is 7% as “ourselves.” Sigh.

Why "Sigh?" This is my choice. The destiny of this country lies with the people, and they've been electing nut-case liberals. Imagine, the most liberal member of the Senate became our president!

Look at the conquest of Europe by the Muslims. The Muslims have no power except that which the Europeans gave them. Europe is rotting because the people have lost their values, and the same thing is happening here.

I never would have imagined that a president who saved this country from terrorism would have been so vilified for wiretapping and torture. I never would have imagined envirowackos having so much power. The people of this nation are turning into a bunch of Greenwich Village wimps. I think there is still time to change things, but we are our own worst enemy because we are aiding our enemies.

4 posted on 05/21/2009 8:47:51 PM PDT by ElectronVolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElectronVolt

You are quite right, but that is not what most people think of. The truth is that liberalism is civilizational AIDS. It is quite deadly by itself, but more often creates an atmosphere where opportunistic infections enter and grow.


5 posted on 05/21/2009 8:56:24 PM PDT by rmlew ( The SAVE and GIVE acts are institutioning Corvee. Where's the outtrage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

Good point.


6 posted on 05/21/2009 9:19:25 PM PDT by PghBaldy (There's abortion, and then there's infanticide. Obama supports both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

7 posted on 05/22/2009 5:46:41 AM PDT by SJackson (in the fight against terrorism, no middle ground, half-measures leave you half-exposed, D. Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s; rmlew; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; SJackson; SunkenCiv; Clintonfatigued; ...
...the difference along party lines with regard to Israel is noteworthy and troubling.

But no surprise. It's shown up consistently in polls of this type over the last decade or two.

If there were a racial breakdown, the difference in attitudes toward Israel would probably be even wider.

8 posted on 05/22/2009 12:05:48 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ..
79% think Iran would give nuclear weapons to terrorists to attack an American city... 87% of Republicans and 79% of Democrats think the U.S. should be concerned with Israel's security... to this question: "Given that Iran has publicly threatened to annihilate Israel, would Israel be justified in attacking Iran's nuclear facilities?" 67% of Republicans, 47% of Democrats and 57% of Independents answer "yes."
Thanks justiceseeker93. Alongside the party affiliation, they should see how many respondents are self-classified "community organizers".
9 posted on 05/22/2009 5:58:42 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

Thanks for the ping!


10 posted on 05/22/2009 8:45:21 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson