Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/16/2009 6:56:26 PM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kellynla

Best....article.....ever.


2 posted on 05/16/2009 7:05:24 PM PDT by JustaCowgirl (I can support a person I don't always agree with. What I can never support is a person I don't trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
Inconsistency in a leader is a sign of weakness.

Cheney has shown himself to be a gentleman.

Pelotsy has shown herself to be a complete clown. (as has ElBozo)


Cheney could sneeze and the whole village of idiots would blow over.

Say, know where I can finds some ground pepper?
3 posted on 05/16/2009 7:07:15 PM PDT by Fichori (The only bailout I'm interested in is the one where the entire Democrat party leaves the county)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
Dianne Feinstein has provided the least worst explanation for her colleague’s behavior. The alternative — that Speaker Pelosi is a contemptible opportunist hack playing the cheapest but most destructive kind of politics with key elements of national security — is, of course, unthinkable. Senator Feinstein says airily that no reasonable person would hold dear Nancy to account for what she supported all those years ago. But it’s okay to hold Cheney or some no-name Justice Department backroom boy to account?

Well, sure. It’s the Miss USA standard of political integrity: Carrie Prejean and Barack Obama have the same publicly stated views on gay marriage. But the politically correct enforcers know that Barack doesn’t mean it, so that’s okay, whereas Carrie does, so that’s a hate crime. In the torture debate, Pelosi is Obama and Dick Cheney is Carrie Prejean. Dick means it, because to him this is an issue of national security. Nancy doesn’t, because to her it’s about the shifting breezes of political viability.

Bingo! Mark Steyn, you are a genius.

4 posted on 05/16/2009 7:14:36 PM PDT by mc5cents (Show me just what Mohammd brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

Listening to Nanzi actually say that she was fighting a war in Iraq, in those lime green pants and that ridiculous makeup that makes her look way too young for her age just made you have to watch it again to see if she really did say it and mean it. By golly, the woman appeared to be serious. I couldn’t tell if she was just too stupid or to deranged to really think it.

I suppose the next time she visits any secure location, one person will attend willingly and the rest will have to receive handsome retainers for their efforts at looking even mildly amused at her ‘courage.’ For the life of me, I don’t know how these people manage to do visit troops/secure offices; they must have serious cocaine addictions.


5 posted on 05/16/2009 7:15:03 PM PDT by combat_boots (The 5 Stages of Collapse: http://www.energybulletin.net/node/47157)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
The alternative — that Speaker Pelosi is a contemptible opportunist hack playing the cheapest but most destructive kind of politics with key elements of national security — is, of course, unthinkable.

But too sadly true!

7 posted on 05/16/2009 10:34:17 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla; knews_hound
Well, sure. It’s the Miss USA standard of political integrity: Carrie Prejean and Barack Obama have the same publicly stated views on gay marriage. But the politically correct enforcers know that Barack doesn’t mean it, so that’s okay, whereas Carrie does, so that’s a hate crime. In the torture debate, Pelosi is Obama and Dick Cheney is Carrie Prejean. Dick means it, because to him this is an issue of national security. Nancy doesn’t, because to her it’s about the shifting breezes of political viability.

David Axelrod plays 'Not My Job' on 'Wait Wait...Don't Tell Me' (Refers to Carrie Prejean as a dog)

8 posted on 05/16/2009 11:11:39 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
Does she support it? Well, according to the CIA, she did way back when, over six years ago.

Does she oppose it? According to Speaker Pelosi, yes.

She's a whore, not to mention a political whore.

9 posted on 05/17/2009 5:04:29 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (RATs...nothing more than Bald Haired Hippies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

“Perhaps we are so rich, so smart, so advanced that we can fight with one arm and both legs tied behind our back and still win — eventually. Along the way many innocents will suffer.”

We are not. We will suffer.


11 posted on 05/17/2009 6:07:18 PM PDT by dervish (I'm the President see me bow (at 0:50) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S60U-hl35Gw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson