Posted on 05/12/2009 9:31:18 AM PDT by Sergeant Tim
If President Obama wanted to refrain from releasing these photos in order to protect the military forces he commands or promote the security of Americans his two highest obligations as president he could do so by simply issuing an executive order. The applicable statute expressly allows for it, just as it provides for Congress now in the firm control of the president and his party to withhold the photos from disclosure. Instead, Obama and congressional Democrats are choosing to release the photos.
They are making that choice fully aware that it will cost lives. It is a sedulous Democrat talking-point, repeated most recently by Carl Levin, the Senate Armed Services chairman and a key Obama ally, that the revelations of prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib inspired new terrorist recruits, caused American combat casualties, and made the United States more vulnerable to terrorist attack. This has long been Obamas own position. It is a charge he made throughout the 2008 campaign, and it is one he repeated just a month ago in his Strasbourg speech: When we saw what happened in Abu Ghraib, that wasnt good for our security that was a recruitment tool for terrorism. Humiliating people is never a good strategy to battle terrorism.
(Excerpt) Read more at article.nationalreview.com ...
Actually you are incorrect. The thought will make you go blind. With my last and fast failing eyesight I type this. Damn you BipolarBob.
The actual sight will cause instantaneous irreversible cardiac arrest. However I am now immune to this as the thought of this has now totally struck me blind.
BipolarBob, you owe me a braille keyboard!! :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.