If there is such an "overwhelming political support" for an issue, why would not politicians allow referendum?
An Advanced Medical Directive would have been all that was needed.
Romney’s gay marriage imposition has removed the vote.
I’m all about freedom and liberty...but dang this makes me feel all yucky..I think I need to go take a shower now.
I have no problem with what two consenting adults do behind closed doors, but I do have a problem when they try to “mainstream” the behavior and make it appear normal.
They can have their “civil unions” but damnit MARRIAGE is supposed to be a contract between a man and a woman, who pledge their lives together with the sole purpose of eventually producing children, in order to further the human race.
It’s physically impossible for gays to do this, therefor it is NOT natural or normal. Two men scroggin’ will NEVER have the potential to produce another life. The only way they can ever have kids is if they compete with truly INFERTILE hetero couples(who are infertile through no fault of their own) to adopt a child or if they dupe some lesbians into having a kid for them. I understand they may need certain legal protections that a civil union may afford them, but dang they don’t need to elevate that deviant behavior to MARRIAGE status.
Iccckkk
“it was legally unavailable to American gays and lesbians. “
Unless they filed the paperwork with the hospital. That would require a plan, responsibility, and would never make a headline.
“Gay Partner Allowed To Visit Lover Because They Filed Limited Power Of Attorney Paper”
Sub: “Makes legal medical decisions to help lifelong friend”
"At stake was the most basic recognition of marital bonds — something most spouses take for granted. But until May 17, 2004, when Chalmers and Richard Linnell were among a surge of same-sex couples marrying in Massachusetts, it was legally unavailable to American gays and lesbians.
That is a straightforward lie (no pun intended).
An appropriately written, duly signed and notarized "Durable Power of Attorney", by ANY ONE, designating ANY ONE as a "person of interest" in their medical decisions IS legal authority enough for someone so designated to have "visiting" privileges equal to a spouse, or 1st-order family members, in any medical facility. Hospitals know this because they have challenged them and lost.
That same "Durable Power of Attorney" can designate ANY ONE as THE person to make the medical decisions for the patient should the patient become incapable of doing so on their own. Properly established these documents TRUMP even meddling "family members".
Similar remedies in wills, estates, property titles, "living wills" and "family trusts" CAN and DO secure joint or shared financial interests for ANY persons for whom such documents establish those interests.
Even "pension" and "insurance" beneficiary concerns do not REQUIRE any state or federal law, only the decision of the pension or insurance outfit to provide for them in cases of unmarried individuals. Matter of fact, without any state or federal mandate, more and more private plans have, on their own, expanded their terms for eligible beneficiary for their policies.
People demanding 'change' actually have better possibilities for results under freedom and liberty than they do under the sword of government.
The activists got started pushing their agenda in the schools right after the ruling, and some parents who hadn't really given the matter any thought, were suddenly confronted by it, and they weren't thrilled. I guess it remains to be seen if we'll ever get to vote on the matter.
“I was out of work for eight weeks, spent a week in the hospital,” Chalmers said. “That was the first time I really felt thankful for the sense of the security we had, with Rich there, talking with the physicians, helping make decisions. ... It really made a difference.”
I actually blame the hospitals for civil unions and marriages. If they would not have draconian rules about the “only family members”. And allow for friends who some people love more than family...lol. This entire marriage/civil union thing would not even be an issue.
Funny part of all this (and a true one) is that the “gays” are now seeking to allow monogamy to go the way of the dodo bird...
Gays and leftoids have designed a carefully planned agenda and are succeeding in their quest for multiple “partnerships” or whatever the Muslims call having many spouses all at once. Drip, drip, drip, the perverts are slowly chipping away at morality and what is left of America’s values. Sad but inevitable with Obama in the Whitehouse and the communists in Congress.
This story is a BIG LIE. The people of Massachusetts are still angry about this. There is a huge organization, Mass Resistance, that continues to fight against the intrusion of radical homoseuxal propaganda into every facet of life, especially indoctrination in public schools.
Please post these with a barf alert.
Want to know why the “mainstream” press is dead? Unpaid infomercials like this one, courtesy of AP.
|
AP propaganda in order to push the “indoctrination” aspects.
This AP story is a search engine fodder in order to give students something to find when those students write on assignments.
The debate is not dead, the PUBLIC at large rejects homosexual based marriage, the paid for politicians simply rigged the game to deny representation.