Gee how nice of Obama to do this for upcoming NATIONAL POLICE WEEK
http://www.nleomf.com/NPW2009/
1 posted on
05/07/2009 3:04:40 PM PDT by
KeyLargo
To: KeyLargo
2 posted on
05/07/2009 3:06:29 PM PDT by
al baby
(Hi Mom)
To: KeyLargo
Justice Department budget documents say the reduction is being made because "claims are anticipated to decrease" because the number of officers killed in the line of duty has been decreasing. If that's the case Obama wouldn't have to take any action at all. The outlays would reduce on their own.
This guy is one vile bastard, and his Justice Department is in lock step with him.
3 posted on
05/07/2009 3:07:21 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Pres__ent Obama's own grandmother says he was born in Kenya. She was there.)
To: KeyLargo
There are tons of things the government should not be involved in, and I am for huge reductions in government, but in making cuts this program should be among the absolute LAST to go.
4 posted on
05/07/2009 3:09:48 PM PDT by
EyeGuy
To: KeyLargo
Umm . . You know . . I actually kind of agree with this. But only in the context that this is really a States Rights issue. I am for lowering the money the feds collect and disburse from and to us poor citizens, and the states to do their duty.
Look at it from the state view. Are the states saying they don't have to take care of their own because the feds are doing it? If the money has to be filtered throught the feds, you know some is grafted off to some porkbarrel things.
I say the closer the money stays to home, the more power the citizens can exercise over how it's used.
5 posted on
05/07/2009 3:12:09 PM PDT by
jeffc
(They're coming to take me away! Ha-ha, hey-hey, ho-ho!)
To: KeyLargo
To: KeyLargo
So we can screw the ones who protect us yet give billions and trillions to the bankers, corporate lawyers, lobbyists, and the racists ACORN, LaRaza and the NAACP?
Seems fair doesnt it /s
7 posted on
05/07/2009 3:13:44 PM PDT by
sasafras
(TIME FOR A RESURGENCE - FREEDOM IS NOT FREE - NO MORE COMPLAINING - LET'S GET BUSY!)
To: KeyLargo
Don’t fall for it. He’s cutting stuff like this so everyone cryes and complains and then he says see see i tried to do something but you can’t without hurting woman, children, cops.
8 posted on
05/07/2009 3:13:52 PM PDT by
genxer
To: KeyLargo
This fits right in with the program to make injured military pay for their war injuries. This guy really hates the USA.
9 posted on
05/07/2009 3:14:25 PM PDT by
anoldafvet
(Proud Member of the Radical Right-wing Extremist Movement)
To: KeyLargo
You know, in my humble opinion, instead of cutting the budget for the men and women who have died in the line of fire, why doesn't Obama, in all his brilliance, cut the benefits for politicians. As it stands right now, when someone, a politician, serves for only 4 years and gets voted out, that person gets a retirement for rest of his life. Let them start putting money out for their co-pays when receiving better medical care than those, us, who pay for it. Let Obama cut out all the fringe benefits politicians get while supposedly servicing for us. Let the politicians take a 60% cut in pay and do what most working Americans are now doing, cutting their budgets, in order to survive.
If I remember correctly, they are supposed to be working for us, not us for them.
12 posted on
05/07/2009 3:14:33 PM PDT by
antiunion person
("Do as I say, not as I do" says Nazi Pelosi, head of the socialist party of America.)
To: KeyLargo
"There are terrorists, willing to kill Americans, who are more worthy."
13 posted on
05/07/2009 3:15:19 PM PDT by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: KeyLargo
He is asking for trouble.
I’ll wait for all the police to boycott their local offices. (Not that they would really do it, but I’d sure like to see them speak out against Obama somehow.)
14 posted on
05/07/2009 3:15:21 PM PDT by
Salvation
( †With God all things are possible.†)
To: KeyLargo
The proposal is being made just days before Attorney General Eric Holder is expected to attend ceremonies in Washington honoring slain officers. Obama has a tin ear (politically).
Eric Holder had to have been happy when this announcement was made knowing he was going to this ceremony. (I bet he had some really kind words for his ONE)
17 posted on
05/07/2009 3:17:24 PM PDT by
Pontiac
(Your message here.)
To: KeyLargo
Call me a strict constructionalist but can someone explain to me where in the US Constitution it is allowable for the US Government to pay benefits or provide money for benefits to be paid for a local law enforcement officer killed enforcing local laws?
Don't get me wrong, I am all for it and would donate money to such a fund in my state. But according to the Constitution such funds must be provided by the states. We need to stop allowing the Constitution to be hijacked in the name of feel good programs or "for the children's sake."
It's kind of funny that this may be the only thing The One has done that actually has some basis in the Constitution.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson