More Delays. USA/Obama Say They Need 124-Days to Answer; Congress 117 Days (re: Kerchner v Obama)

Puzzo1 ^ | 4/28/2009 | rxsid

[rxsid]

Tuesday, April 28, 2009
More Delays. USA/Obama Say They Need 124-Days to Answer; Congress 117 Days

See the copy of the court documents electronically filed by the defendants on Monday, April 27, 2009:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/14705757/

The lawyer for USA and Obama, Elizabeth A. Pascal, who works in the office of Ralph J. Marra, Acting United States Attorney, is now asking the Court a second time through her motion for more time to answer for the defendants.

Initially, Ms. Pascal only represented the USA and Obama, whose answers or motions were initially due on April 27, 2009. Ms. Pascal requested and obtained an extension to file her responses to May 5, 2009.

Now Ms. Pascal states in her declaration that former Vice President Cheney, the House of Representatives, and Speaker Pelosi have asked that the Department of Justice represent them in the action. She adds that the Justice Department is also deciding which Congressional defendants (meaning Congress, Senate, House, Cheney, and Pelosi) it will represent. Pending the Justice Department making that decision, she is moving the Court for an order allowing all the Congressional defendants more time to answer or otherwise move. She includes in her request additional time for the USA and Obama to answer, whose answers are now due on May 5, 2009.

Ms. Pascal made her motion returnable June 1, 2009 and is asking for an order that she be allowed to file an answer or otherwise move within 20 days of the date of the order to be entered by Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider. This means that if Magistrate Judge Schneider signs the extension order on June 1, 2009, the defendants' answers or motions will be due by June 21, 2009.

Whether or not the President of the United States is eligible for the Office he currently occupies is of utmost national importance. Every passing day Mr. Obama takes executive action that significantly impacts on the lives of Americans. The USA and Obama have already been granted one extension to answer to May 5, 2009. They have therefore been given 77 days to answer. This is enough time for them to answer. With an extension to June 21, 2009, USA and Obama are asking for 124 days and the Congressional defendants are asking for 117 days to answer. Court rules only allow them 60 days. Such delay is not in the national interest and not acceptable. As to the Congressional defendants, a twenty-day extension for them to answer is reasonable, making their answer due by May 18, 2009. Given the national importance of the issues, an extension for all defendants to answer by June 21, 2009 is not acceptable.

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/more-delays-usaobama-say-they-need-124.html

[capt. norm]

There has never been a thing to this other than hysteric innuendo, and it shames conservatism to be even tangentially connected to this stuff.

If you don't care to defend the Constitution, don't make fun of those that do.

You're more like a 'spectator' than a citizen.

[Red Steel]

Bump!

[Red Steel]

And no Congress Critter spoke up exept the guy from Ohio who raised his hand possibly in objection to Obama.

[rxsid]

"It is said his British citizenship expired in 1982 when he was 21. I don’t think the dual citizenship is a problem though.

The question is: What is on that Vault Birth Certificate that is so controversial that lawyers must be engaged to fight lawsuits demanding its release"

Your referring to his Kenyan citizenship. That's what his campaign and the falsecheck web site noted (that he, allegedly, lost his Kenyan citizenship at age 21).

However, as Mario points out...there is no record of Barry renouncing his British citizenship. Furthermore, the British Nationality Acts didn't "remove" his British citizenship, neither did the Kenyan Constitution.

A good explanation from Mario, on why Barry is still a British citizen, can be found here:

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/obama-president-of-us-is-currently-also_07.html

[rxsid]

However, your right about the fact that Barry continues to fight the release of a copy of his long form vault b.c., as well as his college records (among others as well). It’s becoming clearer, that he is clearly not (and never has been...going back to At Birth) a “Natural Born Citizen.” Ironically, what he is hiding in his college records and original long form b.c. may determine weather or not he is even here legally. If he were truly born in Kenya, his mother was too young to convey citizenship (read citizenship and not NBC) to him. If he were truly born in HI, he would be a ‘citizen’ with dual U.S. and British citizenship. Not NBC.

[Vendome]

The question I have is why he doesn’t show us the one he found among his mother’s belongings?

[Polarik]

It takes 124 days to get a Vault Birth Certificate from the State of Hawaii?

They need the time to let the forged long-form age under the UV lamps.

[mquinn]

He does not continue to have British citizenship. Please don’t resort to lying to support an already tenuous conspiracy.

[rxsid]

Please provide evidence to back up your claim that he somehow, somewhere, lost his British citizenship.

Thanks.

[mquinn]

The burden of proof is on you, Birther-boy.

[rxsid]

LOL. Nice one Uslurpler-boy. It’s fun being juvenile again...isn’t it?

Found that evidence yet of where he renounced his British Citizenship he’s had since birth?