Skip to comments.
Leahy Agrees With Schultz: Cheney Wants Terrorist Attack On USA
FinkelBlog ^
| Mark Finkelstein
Posted on 04/21/2009 5:45:37 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
It’s one thing for the host of a new MSNBC show, trolling for ratings in Olbermann-land, to make outrageous accusations against a former Vice-President. It’s altogether a different matter for a sitting United States Senator to second the slander.
Yet that’s just what happened on this evening’s Ed Show. Host Schultz accused Dick Cheney of wanting America to be “hit again” by terrorists. A few minutes later, Sen. Pat Leahy of Vermont agreed with him.
ED SCHULTZ: I think that Dick Cheney wants this country to get hit again for political gain. I believe that he thinks in his mind if we can think, make them think, the enemy, that we’re weak because Obama can’t stand up for us, we’re going to get hit, and then of course we can paint the picture that the Democrats just can’t get the job done on national security. I think Cheney is that mean.
View video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at finkelblog.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: dickcheney; edschultz; leakyleahy; patrickleahy; senatordepends; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
To: Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; netmilsmom; Diogenesis; MEG33; PGalt; ...
Schultz/Leahy slander Cheney ping to Today show list.
2
posted on
04/21/2009 5:46:15 PM PDT
by
governsleastgovernsbest
(Conservative criticism of the liberal media: www.finkelblog.com)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Duck Cheney wants a terorist attack on the USA? Is this “Opposite Land”? I think Leahy and Schultz ought to sever their relationship with the creature.
4
posted on
04/21/2009 5:47:56 PM PDT
by
LottieDah
(If only those who speak so eloquently on the rights of animals would do so on behalf the unborn)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I think that Dick Cheney wants this country to get hit again for political gain.Cheney is just saying it like it is.....
.....Obama is setting us up for another, maybe a series of attacks.
You can't make nice with terrorists and get away with it.
5
posted on
04/21/2009 5:49:27 PM PDT
by
SteamShovel
(Global Warming, the New Patriotism)
To: LottieDah
If a terrorist attacked Vermont and Ed Schultz I wouldn’t cry.
6
posted on
04/21/2009 5:49:32 PM PDT
by
Terry Mross
( I hate all politicians. Including republicans.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Can you say “Projection” boys and girls? I knew you could.
7
posted on
04/21/2009 5:49:51 PM PDT
by
wolfpat
(Revolt, and re-establish the Constitution as the law of the land!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I think Cheney is that mean.
I know that Ed Schultz is that stupid.
8
posted on
04/21/2009 5:50:06 PM PDT
by
WorkingClassFilth
(Actually, it all started back in Mayberry. Helen Crump was a traveler and Floyd, well, you know...)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I didn’t know turds had faces. wow
9
posted on
04/21/2009 5:50:08 PM PDT
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Lord help us! These people are going to get us all killed. They have no idea, Cheney is trying to wake these idiots up.
Are they trying to cover their arses if/when we do get hit by saying “Cheney called it”.
To: SteamShovel
If I was a little more paranoid, I would think Obama was setting us up for more attacks so he could push through more of his agenda.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Unbelievably irresponsible! There is nothing to low for Leaky.
12
posted on
04/21/2009 5:51:37 PM PDT
by
Bahbah
To: governsleastgovernsbest
13
posted on
04/21/2009 5:51:51 PM PDT
by
lonestar
(Obama is turning Bush's "mess" into a catastrophe.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
The left is just projecting their hatefulness on Cheney. The left for the last 6 have been jumping for joy everytime body bags came home from Iraq. The left only cares about political gain at any costs, and they assume others do also.
14
posted on
04/21/2009 5:53:55 PM PDT
by
Always Right
(Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
The LibTard insanity roles on...
15
posted on
04/21/2009 5:54:01 PM PDT
by
PubliusMM
(RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
16
posted on
04/21/2009 5:54:24 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I see where this is going, when we get hit again it will be “Cheney’s fault”
17
posted on
04/21/2009 5:54:35 PM PDT
by
txroadkill
(Tax Day Tea Parties 4/15/09 - - The day we won one for the Gipper.)
To: Snickering Hound
You know if O had to declare Marshall law he could repeal the Constitution and declare himself ruler for life.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
like a bullfighter waving a red flag, they keep talking about the administration that
isn't.What about the one that is?
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Can liberals go any lower than that? Yes they can.
20
posted on
04/21/2009 5:55:22 PM PDT
by
jveritas
(God Bless our brave troops)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
