Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RUSSIA MOVES TROOPS CLOSER TO GEORGIA'S CAPITAL
Kyiv Post ^ | April 21, 2009 | AP Staff

Posted on 04/21/2009 1:24:09 PM PDT by mick

Russia has stationed its forces just 25 miles (40 kilometers) from the Georgian capital, in violation of the EU-brokered cease-fire that ended last year's brief war. And in recent weeks, it has sent even more troops and armored vehicles to within striking distance of the city ahead of street protests against Georgia's president.

(Excerpt) Read more at kyivpost.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: belarus; chavez; china; coldwar2; communism; georgia; kazakhstan; obama; peacemission2009; putin; russia; russianmilitary; russiantroops; sinorussian; sovietunion; test; ussr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-190 next last
To: mick
Another way to fund a war is by plunder. Just look at how much booty a few Somali Pirates had been able to acquire. Basically the Russians would rape, ransom and pillage while transferring some of their booty or loot into US treasuries. If the US had used this ruthless technique in Iraq, we would own all their oil deposits and would have paid for that war by selling the oil. Instead we went massively into debt to fund the war. One can hope that the Russians would have problems getting anyone to loan them money for war. The Russians however were one of the few countries to have a large cash surplus back when oil prices peaked. They have been using that to stay aggressive. In our current situation however, oil prices can only go higher right now. The Israeli/Iran conflict could seriously affect oil flow and we have an environmentally friendly (bows to the Saudi King) President. The US wont be driving the price down with added supply. Only reason the price collapsed in the first place was because economic activity collapsed. The Russians also have to solve their serious population decline.
161 posted on 04/22/2009 3:58:01 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: mick

Belarus is already friendly with and controlled by Russia.


162 posted on 04/22/2009 4:03:42 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

Yes. But last yr when Putin made some noises about bringing them into a modified union the commie boss balked and tried to maintain some independence a la Tito. But I think you are right that when push comes to shove Belarus will disappear and Russian Tanks will roll in to protect against NATO......right on the Polish border and out flank Ukraine.


163 posted on 04/22/2009 4:17:32 PM PDT by mick (Central Banker Capitalism is NOT Free Enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape
War funding by other means. Yea, it's certainly possible.

But if the Russians march into Georgia and Poland and Ukraine mobilize then the fat is in the fire.

Then the key question in the world is: What will the America Hating Community Organizer in the WH do.

And what will our military and conservative patriots do if we surrender our allies to the mercies of Comrade Putin. Somewhere in our collective memory I think I hear the opening credits of the movie "Seven Days In May" playing again. And that will not be good.

164 posted on 04/22/2009 4:49:18 PM PDT by mick (Central Banker Capitalism is NOT Free Enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

You did a fine job stopping Sherman.

Quit while you’re ahead. :)


165 posted on 04/22/2009 5:44:01 PM PDT by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: All

No one cares about the “disproportionate Response’ of the new CCCP but let Israel protect herself and WHAM, out come the nazis and the 21 state muslim dictatoriate squawking about their own financed terror/propaganda that wiped out Czecholslovakia without a battle...same lies, same BS another day.... sh** this whole thing is going to end up in Megiddo faster than Obama can say,”Uh...”


166 posted on 04/22/2009 6:27:43 PM PDT by Karliner (Things are more like they are now than they have ever been before. DDE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mick

The Belarussian military is a wing of the Russian one, and follows the orders of the Russian govt.


167 posted on 04/22/2009 9:05:04 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90
I didn't know that. I was led to believe that they were following the old Tito model of structural independence but strategic congruity. Thank you

When you say a "wing" do you mean their Command and Control structure is integrated with the Russian Military or just that they are a close ally with a separate structure like the old Warsaw Pact?

168 posted on 04/22/2009 9:23:14 PM PDT by mick (Central Banker Capitalism is NOT Free Enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90
The Red machine may also be rolling toward Poland & the Baltic states (shades of 1939) since Obama will not lift one of his appeasing fingers to stop Putin's Kremlin.


169 posted on 04/23/2009 12:49:24 AM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is not 'free'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: mick

the military bloggers are really starting to speculate that we could see an invasion in the very near future:

http://www.yankeesailor.us/?p=1111


170 posted on 04/23/2009 6:17:31 AM PDT by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott
Thanks for the link. I've read similar reports on other blogs.

The main strategic benefit for Russia these folks keep saying is the port at Poti. But the Russians already have a major base on the Black Sea.

Second, as I've mentioned above this will galvanize the Ukrainians and Poles to, at minimum, begin a defensive mobilization. And as far as the Ukrainians are concerned, nothing like a foreign threat to focus the people's mind away from their horrible domestic problems. Just today the Kiev Post is running an article that the water supply will soon be rationed in Kiev.

And third and most important...Where Stands Turkey? Will the Russian's even act if Turkey ( a NOTO member, lets not forget)objects? Maybe. But a big maybe. In 2008 the Russian's achieved a certain respect in the region...but another actual invasion to subjugate the whole country will be an entirely different matter with huge risks for the Bear.

171 posted on 04/23/2009 7:09:30 AM PDT by mick (Central Banker Capitalism is NOT Free Enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: mick

Belarus’s C&C is integrated with Russia.


172 posted on 04/23/2009 8:42:22 AM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: mick

Maybe the Turks have already raised an objection in a way - reports are a large portion of their Black Sea Fleet is underway also. That’s a lot of naval hardware out a sea at one time.

From a Russian prospective there is a lot to gain and not too much to lose IMO. They are going to kill a number of birds with one stone.

1) It will put all the former Warsaw satellite countries on notice that Russia is back. The Crimea and the Baltic countries cannot like the trend developing.

2) Probably force Ukraine back to the negotiating table on a number of issues, least of which is the rights for use of the port at Sevastpool (sp).

3) If they keep the Roki tunnel intact, they will have a land route to support and supply large armored formations south of the Caucaus Mountains (historically and strategically significant).

4) Control of the gas pipelines in Georgia and would place a further stranglehold over the supply of energy to Europe.

the downside risks I see are minimal: All the Georgian armed forces are going to do is act as a speed bump. I suppose a Grozny like insurgency is not out of the question. Likelihood of direct interference from the US is practically zero. The one question mark, as Genesis rightly points out, is how is Europe going to react.


173 posted on 04/23/2009 9:05:51 AM PDT by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: mick

Has our President apologized yet?


174 posted on 04/23/2009 9:06:35 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mick

Maybe the Turks have already raised an objection in a way - reports are a large portion of their Black Sea Fleet is underway also. That’s a lot of naval hardware out a sea at one time.

From a Russian prospective there is a lot to gain and not too much to lose IMO. They are going to kill a number of birds with one stone.

1) It will put all the former Warsaw satellite countries on notice that Russia is back. The Crimea and the Baltic countries cannot like the trend developing.

2) Probably force Ukraine back to the negotiating table on a number of issues, least of which is the rights for use of the port at Sevastpool (sp).

3) If they keep the Roki tunnel intact, they will have a land route to support and supply large armored formations south of the Caucaus Mountains (historically and strategically significant).

4) Control of the gas pipelines in Georgia and would place a further stranglehold over the supply of energy to Europe.

the downside risks I see are minimal: All the Georgian armed forces are going to do is act as a speed bump. I suppose a Grozny like insurgency is not out of the question. Likelihood of direct interference from the US is practically zero. The one question mark is how is Europe going to react.


175 posted on 04/23/2009 9:08:08 AM PDT by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: mick

maybe something, may be nothing -

http://weartv.com/template/inews_wire/wires.international/39b6d484-www.weartv.com.shtml

Gunfire exchanged on Georgia-South Ossetia border
April 23, 2009 07:04 EDT

TBILISI, Georgia (AP) — Georgia and its breakaway region of South Ossetia have reported gunfire exchanges along their tense administrative border. No casualties have been reported.

The reported shootings occurred before talks with international monitors Thursday on efforts to diffuse tensions in the region following last year’s war between Georgia and Russia, which backs South Ossetia.

Georgia’s Interior Ministry says a police post in the village of Plavi came under automatic weapon fire for several minutes Wednesday night.

South Ossetia’s separatist government says about two hours later heavy-caliber weapons were fired on the village of Otrev, where about 15 families live. A government spokeswoman says villagers sought safety in nearby woods.


176 posted on 04/23/2009 9:42:03 AM PDT by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: mick

Time to fire-up the word processors down at the UN...


177 posted on 04/23/2009 11:21:20 AM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mick

Russia will weaken the Ukraine through Civil War. West verses east. After the two sides weaken each other, Russia spends some money and rolls the tanks in on the cheap. Large sections of Georgia are already gone. Russia will take the rest whenever they want it. Poland will be the challenge. They seriously need nuclear weapons and I recommend purchasing as many as they need from Israel. If Poland had nukes, Russia would have to treat them as Russia is treating Israel. Attacking through proxy (Iran). So Poland will also eventually need missile defense. It seems to me that the future of the Free World is in the hands of the Israelis. DC is pretty much all tied up with Crooked Party apes throwing crap at each other.


178 posted on 04/23/2009 2:53:33 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott
3) If they keep the Roki tunnel intact, they will have a land route to support and supply large armored formations south of the Caucaus Mountains (historically and strategically significant).

The Russians not only want a warm water port along the southern Middle Eastern coastline, they appear to be getting one from Syria along the western Middle East coastline, they also want some major highways and railways between the Russian homeland and the strategically important warm water ports. They are also worried about our presence in Iraq and countering that appears to be the most significant strategic goal they have right now. Which explains why they are thwarting attempts to stop Iran's nuclear ambitions.

179 posted on 04/23/2009 3:11:30 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape
Interesting you mentioned Poland. I just saw George Friedman of STRATFOR on c-span and he was discussing his new book on his predictions about the next hundred yrs and he mentioned Poland as being one of three emerging Great Powers of the 21st century....the other two being Turkey and Japan...along with the USA of course, no matter how much BO hurts us.

So I would agree with you that a nuclear armed Poland, along with Israeli would be an effective way to tame the Bear.And pretty much insure Germany stays inside the tent.

180 posted on 04/23/2009 3:17:52 PM PDT by mick (Central Banker Capitalism is NOT Free Enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson