Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Anyone who has served in any military branch knows from common sense that the homosexual lifestyle is not compatible with living in military barracks, using communal showers, and all the rest. Homosexuals have every right to support the military in the private sector but they have no business forcing their lifestyle on our young men and women who have volunteered to serve.
1 posted on 04/16/2009 11:23:24 AM PDT by DesertRenegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DesertRenegade
The volunteer army would end. No matter how bad the economy gets.
2 posted on 04/16/2009 11:25:25 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade
Homosexuals in the military is a prescription for defeat and surrender. I am sure the Chicoms and Russians are laughing hysterically at even the thought of US doing this asinine change.
3 posted on 04/16/2009 11:26:27 AM PDT by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=31416


4 posted on 04/16/2009 11:26:49 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

The Navy is downsizing. The Army and Marine Corps are enlarging. This would be detrimental to the Army and Marine Corps as they are taking the brunt of Afganistan and other areas. No offense to the Navy...I am in, but we just don’t need the additional manpower right now. Now back to the subject, the don’t ask, don’t tell is a policy that has worked for almost 10 years...just keep it. There is nothing wrong with it. Although if they lift the ban, I can’t imagine the military getting this huge influx of homosexuals that people fear. However, my wanting the ban has more to do with morals than anything else. God is getting pissed at America...I am sure of it.


5 posted on 04/16/2009 11:26:59 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

http://cmrlink.org/CMRDocuments/FlagOfficersLetterPOTUS-033109.pdf


6 posted on 04/16/2009 11:27:29 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2009/04/14/ST2009041402780.html?sid=ST2009041402780


7 posted on 04/16/2009 11:28:15 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade
...more than 1,000 retired flag and general officers who have joined us in signing an open letter ...

My guess is that the left would simply say (to those still active) "Thanks for helping us identify the "bigots" - don't let the door hit you in the rear."

Short-sighted they are - to our detriment...

8 posted on 04/16/2009 11:28:45 AM PDT by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

having served I can honestly say that not one guy I know or myself would want to have homos in the military
what if you go to the shower and this sicko comes on to you and you smash his face into the tiled area.

Would I get done because this sicko had an hard on and tried it on with me

yea I would and that is one reason why it should not happen


9 posted on 04/16/2009 11:29:51 AM PDT by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman no sick queer sham--- end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

What happened in Israel when it, uh, integrated??, its armed forces? (I’m not sure what term to use.) Or maybe it only integrated some of its forces but not others? I often hear “It worked fine in Israel” but never have followed up on these assertions.


13 posted on 04/16/2009 11:40:18 AM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

Zero is not looking ahead. If he fools around with the military and they all quit, and these terrorists keep it up, the draft will be back. Now, zero’s two daughters will be of age for the draft and they will have to serve if thier number os called.
This would all play out if there is no deferments, and there should be NONE.


14 posted on 04/16/2009 11:40:43 AM PDT by devistate one four (CW II on the way! Stand by. TET68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade
"And the damage would not stop there. Legislation introduced to repeal Section 654 (H.R. 1283) would impose on commanders a radical policy that mandates "nondiscrimination" against "homosexuality, or bisexuality, whether the orientation is real or perceived.""

While many closeted gays have served with distinction, to open the doors officially would bring a slew of wannabes, leather fetishists, "bears" and affirmative action activists out to prove something politically, but not fit for combat. Imagine the tears and the discrimination lawsuits if a drill sergeant demands equal performance.

And what would be next? -- "Whether the orientation is real or perceived" opens the door to transgenders, including the political test-case applicants. Anyone who spurns advances would be open to charges of bigotry, hate and homophobia. What an expensive mess, just when our economy is tanking and our enemies are just looking for their chance.

15 posted on 04/16/2009 11:45:41 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("Shouldn't there be equal time for our Bill of Responsibilities?" -- Justice Clarence Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

I have always had this question and challenge and urge that the argument be made vigorously along these lines:

“If its ok with the NeoMarxists to put open homosexuals into men’s barracks and communal showers,

and, if that makes heterosexual men uncomfortable - then “too bad - you have no rights and your feelings or belief system are of no concern to anyone - homosexuals feelings and concerns trump the majority”,

then,

why is it not equally ok to house men in women’s barracks and communal latrines/showers? How is it any different?”

Thought so, you sick freaking hypocritical Leftist NeoMarxist Scum.

In one instance you are forcing a situation where meat gazing homosexual humanoids who are sexually attracted to humanoid males in with other men whether they like it or not.

Then why is it not equally ok to put heterosexual humanoids who are sexually attracted to females in with females?

FU and your double standards, Democrats.

Or are we now going to give every soldier his or her own room and latrine?

Finally - what are you going to do when deployed in FO’s and other remote areas. What about TDY? The homosexual going to always get his or her own room and everyone else shares a room?

This is a BS fvking nightmare thought up by NeoMarxist twits.


17 posted on 04/16/2009 11:49:43 AM PDT by FTL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

I would think the destruction of the military is one of their primary goals...


20 posted on 04/16/2009 11:56:49 AM PDT by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

"Major Dick Waud reporting, sir! And may I say you look super fabulous today, sergeant!"

21 posted on 04/16/2009 12:00:50 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

The destruction of the US military was probably agreed to by Hussein as part of the bargain he made with big money homosexuals for funding of his campaign.


23 posted on 04/16/2009 12:10:24 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRenegade

When I was in Airborne school there was a Sargeant there who had a strange fascination with one of the soldiers ,who was a private in our company. Due to his lower rank the private did his best to tolerate and tried to avoid the sargeant but that proved insufficient. This soldier and I shared a room with two other soldiers and we did our best to try and be around him as much as possible to lessen the sargeants opportunitys to get at the private. One night at about midnight I was awakened by a commotion and that commotion turned out to be the intoxicated sargeant putting his hands on the private. Turns out he was caressing the privates buttocks while he was sleeping which of course woke up the private. Before I or the other two soldiers could react in came the duty NCO. I still remember his words to this day “ I told you what I would do if I caught you doing this s**t. The next thing I know he had the offender by the neck and dragged him out of the room and we watched as they disappeared into the day room. The next day the sargeant was not wearing his black hat any longer and the swelling on his face told the rest of the story. He worked at headquarters company and then was gone by the time we got to jump week. I would like to say that this was an isolated incident during the time I served but it was not. There was another sargeant in one of the units I served with that liked to be friendly to those under his command also. When your job is to kill the enemy while making sure that you and your buddys stay alive ,you should not have to worry about protecting your A** if you know what I mean.


26 posted on 04/16/2009 12:35:55 PM PDT by Steel Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson