Posted on 04/16/2009 11:23:24 AM PDT by DesertRenegade
The Navy is downsizing. The Army and Marine Corps are enlarging. This would be detrimental to the Army and Marine Corps as they are taking the brunt of Afganistan and other areas. No offense to the Navy...I am in, but we just don’t need the additional manpower right now. Now back to the subject, the don’t ask, don’t tell is a policy that has worked for almost 10 years...just keep it. There is nothing wrong with it. Although if they lift the ban, I can’t imagine the military getting this huge influx of homosexuals that people fear. However, my wanting the ban has more to do with morals than anything else. God is getting pissed at America...I am sure of it.
My guess is that the left would simply say (to those still active) "Thanks for helping us identify the "bigots" - don't let the door hit you in the rear."
Short-sighted they are - to our detriment...
having served I can honestly say that not one guy I know or myself would want to have homos in the military
what if you go to the shower and this sicko comes on to you and you smash his face into the tiled area.
Would I get done because this sicko had an hard on and tried it on with me
yea I would and that is one reason why it should not happen
“God is getting pissed at America”
I would venture to say God is by now enraged by what He sees. It’s beyond “pissed.”
Barracks:
Men’s
Women’s
Other’s
Thanks. Sorry, I didn’t know the story had already been posted under a different title.
What happened in Israel when it, uh, integrated??, its armed forces? (I’m not sure what term to use.) Or maybe it only integrated some of its forces but not others? I often hear “It worked fine in Israel” but never have followed up on these assertions.
Zero is not looking ahead. If he fools around with the military and they all quit, and these terrorists keep it up, the draft will be back. Now, zero’s two daughters will be of age for the draft and they will have to serve if thier number os called.
This would all play out if there is no deferments, and there should be NONE.
While many closeted gays have served with distinction, to open the doors officially would bring a slew of wannabes, leather fetishists, "bears" and affirmative action activists out to prove something politically, but not fit for combat. Imagine the tears and the discrimination lawsuits if a drill sergeant demands equal performance.
And what would be next? -- "Whether the orientation is real or perceived" opens the door to transgenders, including the political test-case applicants. Anyone who spurns advances would be open to charges of bigotry, hate and homophobia. What an expensive mess, just when our economy is tanking and our enemies are just looking for their chance.
I don’t think it would end....It would be full of queers
I have always had this question and challenge and urge that the argument be made vigorously along these lines:
“If its ok with the NeoMarxists to put open homosexuals into men’s barracks and communal showers,
and, if that makes heterosexual men uncomfortable - then “too bad - you have no rights and your feelings or belief system are of no concern to anyone - homosexuals feelings and concerns trump the majority”,
then,
why is it not equally ok to house men in women’s barracks and communal latrines/showers? How is it any different?”
Thought so, you sick freaking hypocritical Leftist NeoMarxist Scum.
In one instance you are forcing a situation where meat gazing homosexual humanoids who are sexually attracted to humanoid males in with other men whether they like it or not.
Then why is it not equally ok to put heterosexual humanoids who are sexually attracted to females in with females?
FU and your double standards, Democrats.
Or are we now going to give every soldier his or her own room and latrine?
Finally - what are you going to do when deployed in FO’s and other remote areas. What about TDY? The homosexual going to always get his or her own room and everyone else shares a room?
This is a BS fvking nightmare thought up by NeoMarxist twits.
I served 12 years in the US Navy and over the years I have met many gay males, all of them are constantly thinking about sex and nothing else. Also before the Clinton administration ordered a change in the way the data was presented in 1997 the FBI crime report for that year showed that in the cases of child abductions under the age of 12 not done by relatives of the child, 98% of those were done by homosexual males. Freud was right in his idea that homosexuality is a mental condition.
I would think the destruction of the military is one of their primary goals...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.