[Sub-Driver]

I'll be right back after i get done screaming in the backyard....

[elpadre]

why is releasing the information so important to them?

Are they not aware that we are in an ongoing war that may well last for a generation??

The less the enemy knows, the better for our people - our nation!!

[muawiyah]

We've really gotta' get back control of the government so we can try Obamistas like Craig and Holder for treason.

That' what those pukes ought to have on their minds ~ a big fat noose at the end of their terms.

[unkus]

I don’t know what to say anymore. If I said some of what I think, I’d have the door knocked down in about 5 minutes.

[Mikey_1962]

Top CIA officials have spoken out strongly against a full release, saying it would undermine the agency's credibility with foreign intelligence services and hurt the agency's work force, people involved in the discussions said.

Gosh, They are begining to understand, elections have consequences, and consequences are the natural result of risky behavior.

[UCANSEE2]

Be careful not to violate the Community Decibel Limit.

[A. Morgan]

Zero is a A GREAT BIG ZERO! Buy a CLUE, Zero!

[colorado tanker]

Looks like these a-holes are headed for another Church Committee style attack on the CIA. That crippled us for years.

[BuffaloJack]

> I’ll be right back after i get done screaming in the backyard....
I’ll be right beside you drowning you out ...

[Sprite518]

Everyday the news just gets worst. Just think it has been less than 100 days. I cannot imagine where we will be in 4 years.

[airborne]

I’m sure the folks who do the “dirty work” at the CIA will be thrilled with this!

Obama is looking for trouble, IMO.

[BuffaloJack]

Gee, why not just require CIA agents to wear tee-shirts with CIA on the back in 8” letters.

[synbad600]

God help me for saying this but I hope the people who want this released get their comeuppance, one way or another. Preferably through terrorism.

[prismsinc]

Uh, Treason, Impeachment...

[UCANSEE2]

Thanks for posting the article.

---

“despite a push by some top officials to make the information public”

---

Who are the ‘top officials’ who want to do this????

[Cheetahcat]

"Despite a push"?? Who the hell is going to help the CIA if they get their Name ,Picture.and address in the New York Times the very next day. Great move Zippy.

[ElayneJ]

“We want to maximize the amount of information available to the American people,” said a senior administration official involved in the discussions...”
____________________
Oh yeah? I guess this means maximize the amount of information available that would severly damage national security or put other people’s lives at risk, but certainly not information regarding obama, his college years, his place of birth, his former employment, his previous and current associations, or the content of pending legislation.

[Wild Irish Rogue]

” Top CIA officials have spoken out strongly against a full release, saying it would undermine the agency’s credibility with foreign intelligence services and hurt the agency’s work force,”

Which is precisely why Soetero will release it.
He’s not fighting Islamic terrorists,
he’s now fighting law abiding Americans.
He won’t waterboard Osama bin Laden,but,
he’ll waterboard some little old lady from Operation Rescue.

[tiki]

Do not do that, bite your tongue, wince, shed a few silent tears but the backyard might be too public, they might be watching you.

[Squantos]

Keeping a list I hope....dates, what he did , pros and cons, damage done short term and long term etc ........I plan on printing up flyers and dropping em from 10,000 feet AGL once a week, 30 days prior to 2010 elections.

Why congress HAS to be taken back against this poser precedent per se !~

[Ann Archy]

Hey....Hey.....they got a new dog....who CARES about anything else!! Please!