Skip to comments.
Smith: Caroline To Vatican ‘Too Stupid’ To Be True
FinkelBlog ^
| Mark Finkelstein
Posted on 04/14/2009 5:25:17 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
Was Harry Smith trying to cover for Pres. Obama? Or was he simply expressing astonishment at the bone-headedness of the contemplated move? In any case, the Early Show anchor left no doubt that the notion of appointing Caroline Kennedy as US ambassador to the Vatican was a non-starter non-pareil. Chatting this morning with Bill OReilly, a semi-regular Early Show guest, Smith called the floating of Kennedys name too stupid to be true.
HARRY SMITH: Let me ask you about this. Caroline Kennedy: theres this story . . .
BILL OREILLY: Its unbelievable!
SMITH: Wait, wait, wait. Heres my question: do you believe its true? Do you believe the Obama administration would have floated her name?
OREILLY: Yes, I do believe its true.
SMITH: That sounds crazy. Theres only one place that this has actually been reported, in an Italian paper, right?
View video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at finkelblog.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; billoreilly; carolinekennedy; feminazi; harrysmith; proabortionfeminazi; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; netmilsmom; Diogenesis; MEG33; PGalt; ...
Smith in denial over Obama stupidity in suggesting Caroline to Vatican. Ping to Today show list.
2
posted on
04/14/2009 5:26:07 AM PDT
by
governsleastgovernsbest
(Conservative criticism of the liberal media: www.finkelblog.com)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Commencement producer Father Jenkins (pictured, left, with unidentified ND drama instructor) wants to "keep it happy, keep it snappy, keep it gay!"
3
posted on
04/14/2009 5:27:00 AM PDT
by
Notwithstanding
(Member of the Long Grey Line)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
This is the administration that gave the PM of Britain a set of DVDs that don’t work in Britain. Yes, they are stupid enough to consider Caroline Kennedy for Ambassador to the Vatican.
4
posted on
04/14/2009 5:30:31 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
("Never offend people with style when you can offend them with substance." ~Sam Brown)
To: Notwithstanding
This is the Zero’s idea of bipartisanship: I’ll keep saying or doing the same thing while nodding that I hear your. This POS gets more repugnant by the day.
5
posted on
04/14/2009 5:30:58 AM PDT
by
Mouton
To: governsleastgovernsbest
I think it is true. Caroline’s name came out early in the campaign, can't remember exactly what she did, nominating committee, maybe. I think she decided to break into politics and this was going to be her start. I am delighted she bombed out, for whatever reason.
6
posted on
04/14/2009 5:38:05 AM PDT
by
Ditter
To: governsleastgovernsbest
The problem I see is, How do you find a pro life, anti gay marriage, Dem, that is a Catholic? All these are easy if you are a Repub. I vote for Allen Keyes.
7
posted on
04/14/2009 5:39:52 AM PDT
by
chuckles
To: Tax-chick
Obama thinks “Austrian” is a language. He said so when in Austria. what a moron.
8
posted on
04/14/2009 5:41:20 AM PDT
by
mfish13
To: mfish13
Obama thinks Austrian is a language. And his administration seems to be full of people of the same intellectual sophistication.
9
posted on
04/14/2009 5:43:54 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
("Never offend people with style when you can offend them with substance." ~Sam Brown)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
...Caroline Kennedy ambassador to the Vatican?..Bam throwing a bone to fat teddy. What the hell...teddy gave Bam a dog, so...a dog for a dog. What a joke!!
To: Tax-chick
The Government Amateur Hour will have long term consequences for our beloved country. He has two years of unfettered control over us. Taking back the House and the Senate in 2010 may be too late to save us from his Socialist policies. Pray that there are some Dems with consciences in the Legislature that will vote against making us all subservient to the all powerful Obama Government.
To: originalbuckeye
I think there are enough Democrats who want to be reelected in 2010 to avert some of the worst possibilities, but it’s going to be a looooong administration. At least we shot a few pirates, finally.
12
posted on
04/14/2009 5:51:36 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
("Never offend people with style when you can offend them with substance." ~Sam Brown)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
It is stupid, unless your intent is to insult the Vatican. Then it starts to make sense. Does this administration view the Catholic church as an enemy?
13
posted on
04/14/2009 6:16:32 AM PDT
by
CharacterCounts
(November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
To: chuckles
Would a woman ambassador to the Vatican be appropriate, or would they have problems with that?
14
posted on
04/14/2009 6:17:02 AM PDT
by
stayathomemom
(Cat herder and empty nester)
To: stayathomemom
Would a woman ambassador to the Vatican be appropriate, or would they have problems with that? The current one is Mary Ann Glendon and Corinne Boggs served for four years. So I don't think there's a problem.
15
posted on
04/14/2009 6:21:33 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(No free man bows to a foreign king.)
To: KarlInOhio
I was chatting with my parish priest about the appointment to the Holy See.
He has come to the belief that it would be better to have no ambassador than one who is against the tenants of the Church.
16
posted on
04/14/2009 6:24:12 AM PDT
by
mware
(F-R-E-E, that spells free. Free Republic.com baby.)
To: KarlInOhio
17
posted on
04/14/2009 6:24:32 AM PDT
by
stayathomemom
(Cat herder and empty nester)
To: chuckles
The problem is finding a Catholic. This is an ambassadorship to a sovereign state. The Vatican does not have a religious test. Obama need not name a Catholic, and the Vatican would have no objection to the views of such an appointee. Where this gets dicey is asking the Vatican to accept a Catholic who openly defies Church Dogma. That IS a slap in the face to the Churh.
My guess is that Obama is interested in smacking the Church. Otherwise it would have been very easy to pick any contributor in the Dem party for the post, as long as the person wasn't outrageous, say Sean Penn. But no he is looking for pro choice Catholics to wave his abortion and social positions in the Church's face. Maybe he's looking to start a schism and make John Kerry the new Henry VIII.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Caroline Kennedy as US ambassador to the Vatican
Why not? 0bama named a tax cheat as head of the Treasury.
19
posted on
04/14/2009 6:29:38 AM PDT
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
O’Reilly on CBS...how low can he go?
20
posted on
04/14/2009 6:44:15 AM PDT
by
y6162
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson