Posted on 04/13/2009 10:02:53 PM PDT by ebiskit
Well then I've got red flags everywhere. Every business email I send is heavily encrypted.
There is some kind of improvised, and hopefully unsuccessful ‘initiative’ emanating from this Administration, to do just that:it can come in a variety of expressions: from not “allowing” banks to give money back to them, to dangling enormous tantalizing stimulus packages in front of states who still have leaders who have enough principle not to bite hook, line, and sinker,
which effectively creates dissension between Governors and the citizenry of their states.
The wording of this document from the DHS shows us just what they intend to do.
No two ways about it, unless they come up with a VERY persuasive argument which explains that it’s not that at all, not at all.
Which they won’t do.
We should not get lost in side issues that are designed to soften resistance to the juggernaut this Administration is busy putting into place every single day, from a hundred different directions. We should CALL THEM on THIS, because THIS is part of their overall plan. If it weren’t , they wouldn’t be codifying it into legislation.
I never doubted that it was legit, only that I wanted a better citation before running with it. I'd sure like to know how far this thing has gone in terms of distribution.
Oathkeepers is starting to look more serious every day.
Maybe this was leaked because it WAS to get out to the gen pop or media, in order to get us to do something stupid.
It's more likely meant for intimidation if it was leaked on purpose.
You have to think like a frightened overlord to get it.
“I’d sure like to know how far this thing has gone in terms of distribution.”
It shows up in many many places, according to search engine hits.
This Genie is way out of the bottle. Let’s hope the Genie’s name isn’t Pandora!
Thanks for the ping.
I meant within DHS.
I like some of what their platform is all about. I would like to see the Independent party and the Constitution party combine.
The libertarian party has a few good points, but others just keep me at a distance.
There has got to be a way to challenge the two party system with credible, viable candidates.
The highest hurdle I see is overcoming the dollars spent by both the democrats and republicans to discredit and sideline any third party attempt at the process.
The media totally marginalizes any third party effort.
So, what to do?
Keep history in mind.
The left’s MO is to exterminate opposition.
They’re looking for an excuse.
“Many on here knew that this and the Patriot Act was going be used against us.”
I was always fearful of the Patriot Act, especially giving the government more latitude when it comes to phone tapping, etc. Hubby thought it was a good thing — would help to catch terrorists. I asked him, “It might be fine with Bush in the White House, but what if Hillary became Presdident, and SHE had that power?” That was back when we thought Hillary was the worst-case scenario. Little did we know...
Very difficult to break through the good ol boy network in Washington with ordinary folks with common sense on their side.
Combine all three and you have an instant viable party. Problem is...the commies already know this and run some of them as well...that is why they always put the least electable person upfront and keep the votes split.
Who exactly is going to ‘silence or take out’ Jews?
Exactly...
And I might add...the "left" is not just your lefties of the past...they have progressed into an entirely fascist bunch...the lot of them. Left and right is just a veneer...just like in France.
B..b..but I thought dissent was the ultimate patriotism!
“B..b..but I thought dissent was the ultimate patriotism!”
Yes. Just like paying taxes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.