Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USS San Francisco Leaves Bremerton After Long Stay
Kitsap Sun ^ | 7 Apr 09 | Staff

Posted on 04/09/2009 9:51:47 AM PDT by GATOR NAVY

BREMERTON —

The USS San Francisco wrapped up its 3 1/2-year stay in Puget Sound on Tuesday morning.

The Los Angeles-class submarine, which arrived at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard in September 2005 after sustaining damage in a crash with an undersea mountain, ferried out of Puget Sound waters with a tug escort for the last time. The crew of roughly 140 is taking the vessel, with its transplanted bow, to its new homeport in San Diego. The vessel was formerly homeported in Guam.

The submarine stalled not far from the Bremerton ferry terminal on its way out of Sinclair Inlet at about 8:45 a.m., giving onlookers a good view. But Navy personnel said the submarine was conducting planned tests of some systems on board while in the harbor.

The tests were completed and the submarine continued on its way, according to Lt. Kyle Raines, a Navy spokesman.

The submarine arrived at Naval Base Kitsap in September 2005 and entered the shipyard in October 2006 for repairs on its damaged nose. Shipyard workers replaced the damaged portion with the nose from the USS Honolulu, which was decommissioned and recycled at PSNS in late 2007. The cost of transplanting the bow was $134 million.

The fast-attack submarine smashed full speed into the mountain near Guam on Jan. 8, 2005, killing one sailor and injuring 97 of its 137 crew members.

This story has been corrected since it was originally posted. The date the boat entered PSNS in October 2006.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: navy; usn; usssanfrancisco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: ErnBatavia

I am just a couple miles from Naval Base Kitsap I guess they call it that know rather than “Trident Base” I remember when this accident happened telling a friend of mine who is civilian and in charge of large shop that the Captain or whoever was on watch should be in trouble but he said no way. I guess they just haul ass anywhere they want and damn the undersea mounts. I didn’t realize the sub was here the whole time but glad to see it’s back in service.


41 posted on 04/09/2009 10:58:17 AM PDT by Delmont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
Glancing hit. Lucky. The sub must of been kicked to starboard. If it had hit dead on, with all the mass of the boat behind it....


42 posted on 04/09/2009 11:06:17 AM PDT by Leisler ("It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged."~G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY

The sub will be going from the East coast to the West coast.

I wonder if it will be coming through the Panama Canal? If it is, it will not be advertised.

But I sure would like to see it.


43 posted on 04/09/2009 11:08:27 AM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rednesss

Actually, looking at your cut away drawing, it doesn’t even look as if it really penetrated much past the first ballast tank. You can see the torpedo shudder doors in the picture.

Your cut away is of a 688I class (vertical launch tubes, retractable bow planes, D2W reactor core) while the San Fran was a flight 1 boat (no vertical launch tubes, D1G core). FYI, the reactor compartment and engine room in the cut away are not that accurate.

The cut away might be a little off in terms of where the shudder doors are, but I don’t know. I can’t really tell where the GRP dome for the sonar sphere ends, as that would be the begining of the first ballast tank. It’s been a while since I last looked at official navy manuals...


44 posted on 04/09/2009 11:14:27 AM PDT by OA5599
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

FYI — they build ‘em good in Newport News.


45 posted on 04/09/2009 11:15:16 AM PDT by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OA5599
That started with the SSN-718 I think.

Nope--vertical launch started with USS Providence. (SSN-719)
46 posted on 04/09/2009 11:16:46 AM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: Robe

Memory failed; should have looked it up first. The VLS tubes were first installed on the SSN 719 (USS Providence), NOT the SSN 718 (USS Honolulu).


48 posted on 04/09/2009 11:22:56 AM PDT by OA5599
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
Here is a closeup and a news article with a first-hand account. Strategypage.com also has more detailed photos, including what's under the tarp (the damaged sonar).
49 posted on 04/09/2009 11:33:21 AM PDT by zaphod3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY

Eh, a little Bondo, a little hunnert-mile-an-hour tape, it’ll buff right out.

Amazing. It’s scary how close the San Francisco came to joining the Scorpion and the Thresher “eternally on patrol.”

}:-)4


50 posted on 04/09/2009 1:21:31 PM PDT by Moose4 (Hey RNC. Don't move toward the middle. MOVE THE MIDDLE TOWARD YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

“It was not the captain’s fault. The dang mountain wasn’t mapped. No one knew it was there until the sub hit it.”

But they mapped the Ocean floor already? Is it possible the mountain rose up from the floor since the mapping?


51 posted on 04/09/2009 1:27:35 PM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out (click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: chuck_the_tv_out

I can’t answer you question because I don’t know.

There are a couple of ex navy folks on this thread that can help.

Thank you for asking though.


52 posted on 04/09/2009 1:35:52 PM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

I checked it out - it was marked on some maps as “discolored water”. they should have carried that data over which is what some of the reprimands were about


53 posted on 04/09/2009 2:08:46 PM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out (click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

“It was not the captain’s fault. The dang mountain wasn’t mapped. No one knew it was there until the sub hit it.”

This is one of the responsibilities of command. The navigation team failed, and the CO, or XO should have caught it.

54 posted on 04/09/2009 3:02:48 PM PDT by WalterGrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: namsman

Sub ping!


55 posted on 04/11/2009 8:53:35 AM PDT by SW6906 (6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson