Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Binghamton officials defend (lack of) response to massacre
My Way News ^ | 04/05/2009 | JOHN KEKIS

Posted on 04/06/2009 4:19:03 AM PDT by iowamark

Even if police officers had immediately entered the immigrant center where a gunman had just shot down 13 people, the victims' injuries were so severe that none would have survived, a county prosecutor said Sunday.

But police didn't enter the American Civic Association until nearly 45 minutes after the first 911 calls came in at 10:30 a.m. Friday. They began removing the wounded about 15 minutes after that.

It took more than two hours to clear the building. Survivors reported huddling for hours in a basement, not knowing whether they were still in danger after the gunman, 41-year-old Jiverly Wong, killed 13 people.

Medical examiners who conducted autopsies reported that the victims' injuries were so severe they would not have survived, Broome County District Attorney Gerald F. Mollen said....

When police arrived at the scene, the gunfire had stopped, so they believed there was no "active gunman" in the center and decided to wait for the SWAT team to arrive, Zikuski said.

The SWAT team entered the building until 11:13 a.m., 43 minutes after the first call to police....

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.myway.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: banglist; binghamton; voong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
(excerpted because of AP. Please read the whole story at link)

Incredible. The Democrat Binghampton police are now playing coverup.

Victims lay bleeding for over an hour while the police cowered outside.

1 posted on 04/06/2009 4:19:04 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Duplicate http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2222973/posts


2 posted on 04/06/2009 4:21:08 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
> When police arrived at the scene, the gunfire had stopped, so they believed there was no "active gunman" in the center and decided to wait for the SWAT team to arrive, Zikuski said.

Whaaaat?? I don't get it. Does this make sense to anyone else?

3 posted on 04/06/2009 4:24:50 AM PDT by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

My fault. I searched for Binghampton, not Binghamton.

It bears repeating anyway. We cannot count on the police to protect us.


4 posted on 04/06/2009 4:25:05 AM PDT by iowamark (certified by Michael Steele as "ugly and incendiary")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
I guess when it came time to earn their pay they chose the Obama way: Wait for them to die of old age.
5 posted on 04/06/2009 4:31:07 AM PDT by Cheetahcat (Osamabama Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Nope. Just like Columbine. If there’s a crazed gunman or two, the police will just wait for an hour or two rather going in to help. Sure makes me warm and fuzzy to know they got our backs in an emergency.


6 posted on 04/06/2009 4:33:07 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater ("Get out of the boat and walk on the water with us!”--Sen. Joe Biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

The receptionist who dialed 911 was one of those shot.

The coverup is in full force here.


7 posted on 04/06/2009 4:36:38 AM PDT by Carley (President Obama Dropped a MOAB on America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

I *REALLY* doubt any of you would rush into gunfire.


8 posted on 04/06/2009 4:38:35 AM PDT by chadwimc (Proud to be an infidel ! Allah fubar !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: chadwimc

There was no gunfire.

They were on the phone with a bleeding woman who could describe what was going on.

They still waited. It doesn’t make sense.


9 posted on 04/06/2009 4:41:58 AM PDT by Scotswife (GO ISRAEL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chadwimc
I *REALLY* doubt any of you would rush into gunfire.

I think it is understandable for a citizen not to want to rush into that kind of situation. When that citizen is a police officer, kind of different, don't you think? Someone who wants to avoid any gunfire probably should choose another line of work.

10 posted on 04/06/2009 4:44:32 AM PDT by GraceCoolidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chadwimc
I *REALLY* doubt any of you would rush into gunfire.

If I was getting paid to "protect and serve" I would. Seems to me, rushing into gunfire to protect the innocent is kind of in the job description of being a police officer. If it's not, then it should be. This is yet another instance that proves the truth in the statement; "When seconds count, the police are minutes away".

11 posted on 04/06/2009 4:48:58 AM PDT by Turbo Pig (...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Turbo Pig

Saying that a policeman shouoldn’t “rush” to the sound of gunfire is like saying that firemen shouldn’t “rush” to the sight of smoke!


12 posted on 04/06/2009 4:54:20 AM PDT by catman67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

And THESE are the people into whose protective arms I am supposed to run instead of obtaining, carrying and (if necessary) using my own means of self defense?

No thanks.


13 posted on 04/06/2009 4:54:34 AM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DieHard the Hunter

No.


14 posted on 04/06/2009 4:55:15 AM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: catman67

I should expand on my previous point. My son runs into burning buildings for a living. I’ve never known him to wait outside for reinforcements when lives are at stake!!!


15 posted on 04/06/2009 4:57:12 AM PDT by catman67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
Cowered? The police cowered outside?

You were there? You saw this?

Real life isn't Starsky and Hutch. Cops follow orders. You have no idea what the frontline responders were thinking or feeling yet you assume the worst.

16 posted on 04/06/2009 4:58:52 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turbo Pig
"When seconds count, the police are minutes hours away".

Fixed it.

17 posted on 04/06/2009 5:00:43 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

They Government can defend all it wants but the truth is that it fails to protect the citizens that it taxes to protect.
Criminals understand that they have the upperhand for at least an hour in any situation like this. Thata is what they often want.The attention. Oh look, I’m on Tv in a building surrounded by police and they are not even trying to stop me,they are afraid of me.
The system


18 posted on 04/06/2009 5:03:46 AM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Coming to You From the Front Lines of Occupied America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

we do have an idea.

They were on the phone with the receptionist.
)The shooting stopped before they arrived.

She was able to inform them the shooter was not in her room (near the front door)

She was able to inform them the shooter had moved on to the next room and she could no longer hear shots.

Certainly - this information should NOT have encouraged them to continue to wait? While shooting victims continued to bleed out?


19 posted on 04/06/2009 5:03:48 AM PDT by Scotswife (GO ISRAEL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I actually do understand the Police not wanting to go in until they know what’s going on and where the shooter is etc.. Most people don’t understand, their primary job is not to protect us, but to enforce the law and investigate the law breakers.

What I don’t understand are the police that want to disarm the law abiding citizen. If the job falls to us to protect ourselves, I’m okay with that. Just don’t disarm me from the tools that would accomplish this.


20 posted on 04/06/2009 5:04:36 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson