Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN's Alina Cho: Obamas are the 'Royal Family of the United States'
NewsBusters ^ | April 1, 2009 | Matthew Balan

Posted on 04/01/2009 4:40:12 PM PDT by 50mm

CNN correspondent Alina Cho loaded the regal language into her report on Wednesday’s American Morning about Europe’s “apparent love affair” with Michelle Obama. Besides the obligatory Jackie Kennedy references, Cho gave a preview of the first lady’s tea with Queen Elizabeth II: “On today’s schedule: tea with the queen, and insiders say the queen and America’s queen bee will be fast friends.” The correspondent even compared Mrs. Obama to Princess Diana. She also referred to the Obamas as the “royal family of the United States.”

Cho began her report by hyping the first lady’s popularity, how it apparently isn’t exclusive to the States, and how it could overshadow her husband the president: “Tina Brown, as you know, joked about an hour ago that Sara Brown is a beautiful girl but, you know, everybody sort of knows that right now, at least, she pales in comparison to Michelle Obama. Of course, the big question is, could she overshadow the president?...So, you know, there’s no denying that Michelle Obama is a rock star in America, but how is her style and personality playing abroad? Well, the early reviews are very good. The apparent love affair with the U.S. first lady is flourishing in Europe.”

After announcing that Mrs. Obama is a “brand new star” overseas, using glowing remarks from people on a British street to underscore her point, the correspondent made her “royal family” reference to the Obamas. Presidential historian Allan Lichtman (who was unidentified during the report) adopted this moniker in his first sound bite: “How the royal family, and not just a head of government, is received, is very important for perception back here at home.”

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Extended News; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: allanlichtman; bho44; bhouk; obama; obamamessiah; royals; zeroism; zeroworship
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: 50mm

HA HA HA HA HA HA


61 posted on 04/01/2009 5:37:05 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Yeah, but my post is full of hurried mistakes. Check out this article writer's subordination of the title Queen to Ms. Obama's "queen bee" by not capitalizing Queen when refering to Her Majesty.
62 posted on 04/01/2009 5:37:44 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Actually, it all started back in Mayberry. Helen Crump was a traveler and Floyd, well, you know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ResistorSister
Technically, she shouldn't have walked before the Queen. You can pass (as in up the road) but not obstruct the Queen when in close proximity between she and her subjects.
63 posted on 04/01/2009 5:39:41 PM PDT by txhurl (ralph...history books will read: Lincoln freed the slaves & Obama enslaved the free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

Alina Cho

Margaret Cho


64 posted on 04/01/2009 5:40:33 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

65 posted on 04/01/2009 5:40:38 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Cameltoe-lot


66 posted on 04/01/2009 5:42:49 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

Alina Cho has obviously OD’s on the Kool Aid.

The Queen and Diana were NOT fast friends.

I seriously doubt that The Queen sees Michelle as any kind of a friend.

Royalty? The NObama’s are a Royal Pain in the A$$, but that is as close to royalty they can come in the USA.

Kenyan Royalty? More likely.

The absolute lack of class they both exhibit is so apparent. I can well imagine that Queen Elizabeth had the area de-contaminated after the NObamas left the grounds.

I watched NObama and Michelle walking together....she is very tall, but he is absolute taking very large steps, without any regard for her trying to walk in high heeled shoes, and allowing her to at least APPEAR to be a bit more feminine. Looks more like he never learned to walk at the appropriate pace for a woman in high heels. She has to stride out to keep uo with him, and it is very undignified, IMO.


67 posted on 04/01/2009 5:43:15 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

Man, these “reporters” are utterly pathetic in their bias! They’re mercilous. Give us a break!


68 posted on 04/01/2009 5:49:11 PM PDT by popdonnelly (The greatest crimes in history have been perpetrated by governments. You've been warned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

We got rid of royalty in 1776. We don’t need this dude as king.


69 posted on 04/01/2009 5:50:54 PM PDT by popdonnelly (The greatest crimes in history have been perpetrated by governments. You've been warned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

This is alarmingly dangerous talk when coupled with the “firing” if GM’s CEO.


70 posted on 04/01/2009 5:52:02 PM PDT by CaptRon (Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txhurl
Technically, she shouldn't have walked before the Queen. You can pass (as in up the road) but not obstruct the Queen when in close proximity between she and her subjects.

The queen has her position by virtue of somebody else in her family dying. Much like Ariana Huffington, she never would have accomplished anything on her own. It truly amazes me that the UK still allows the farce that is the monarchy to continue. Cut their funding and let the monarchy fade away.

71 posted on 04/01/2009 5:52:30 PM PDT by 50mm (My respect for zero has reached zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: 50mm
Besides the obligatory Jackie Kennedy references,

At least Jacqueline was good looking. Michelle Obama is an ugly skank.

72 posted on 04/01/2009 5:55:14 PM PDT by j_tull (I may make you feel, but I can't make you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

This may strike us as a strange coincidence, but there probably aren't enough Korean last names to go around. At least, there are an awful lot of Kims and Parks over there.

73 posted on 04/01/2009 5:55:44 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

Oh, I agree, but Windsor and Buckingham protocol are every bit as arcane and incomprehensible as BCS rules, and are fun to argue :)


74 posted on 04/01/2009 5:56:53 PM PDT by txhurl (ralph...history books will read: Lincoln freed the slaves & Obama enslaved the free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

Yhe Queen Mom sure seemed to be the royal harlot.


75 posted on 04/01/2009 5:59:08 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

The queen was very confused about the south side of Chicago move by Michelle Obama...did you hear the queen stop in mid sentence as she tried to take it all in?


76 posted on 04/01/2009 6:02:17 PM PDT by ResistorSister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

I’m sure the Queen is thrilled to have High Tea with a bloody WOG.....


77 posted on 04/01/2009 6:10:05 PM PDT by Feckless (No Birth Certificate... No Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 50mm

78 posted on 04/01/2009 6:13:51 PM PDT by 50mm (My respect for zero has reached zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ResistorSister

Chewi sure didn’t waste any time on learning protocol. Only soemone exceedingly low rent turns her back on her hosts. (and that holds extra true in the Arab world)
To paraphrase Bill Buckley, a couple people picked at random from a phone book would be able to navigate that situation better than than those two.


79 posted on 04/01/2009 6:14:13 PM PDT by Kanzan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: 50mm; yorkie; TigersEye
She also referred to the Obamas as the “royal family of the United States.”

EWWWW!!! Maybe that old queen will knight 0 & make his wife a Lady.

80 posted on 04/01/2009 6:19:20 PM PDT by pandoraou812 (Don't play leapfrog with a unicorn! ...........^............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson