Skip to comments.
Palin Comments on Dismissal of Charges (against Stevens)
Office of the Governor of the State of Alaska ^
| 04-01-09
| Gov. Sarah Palin
Posted on 04/01/2009 2:50:19 PM PDT by euram
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Just think, cooked up charges to get a Rep. senator out of the way, who would have thunk such a thing.
1
posted on
04/01/2009 2:50:19 PM PDT
by
euram
To: Abbeville Conservative; gimme1ibertee; ExGeeEye; euram; william clark; Clyde5445; brushcop; ...

PING!
Anyone on or off the Palin ping, write me.
2
posted on
04/01/2009 2:51:47 PM PDT
by
SolidWood
(Palin: "We do not want to becomes slaves of Washington.")
To: euram
What a horrible thing he has endured. The blatant attempts by adversaries to destroy ones reputation, career and finances are an abuse of our well-guarded process and violate our God-given rights afforded in the Constitution. It is a frightening thing to contemplate what we may be witnessing here the undermining of the political process through unscrupulous ploys and professional misconduct.She knows what she is talking about.
3
posted on
04/01/2009 2:53:23 PM PDT
by
SolidWood
(Palin: "We do not want to becomes slaves of Washington.")
To: euram
Any possibility she could void the last election and schedule a special election? just wondering.
To: euram; ExTexasRedhead
Ask Tom Delay. His Texas 3 grand-jury shopped indictment has yet to go to trial after 2 years. They have nothing on him and he will get off. The RINOS controlling the RNC are afraid DeLay will come back. We need him active.
The prosticutors who do these things should be jailed.
5
posted on
04/01/2009 2:54:24 PM PDT
by
Candor7
(The weapons of choice against fascism are ridicule, and derision. (member NRA)
To: euram
The Obama Justice Dept. drops charges against a Republican Senator originally filed by the Bush Justice Dept....? Something weird here.
6
posted on
04/01/2009 2:54:30 PM PDT
by
mono
To: euram
Sen. Stevens was targeted for personal destruction and they succeeded. They got him to lose his Senate seat based on the false charges. Governor Palin is being targeted for personal destruction. She has numerous phony ethics charges against her and she is continually attacked by the MSM. It just goes on and on.
7
posted on
04/01/2009 2:55:13 PM PDT
by
detective
To: euram
Senator Stevens and I had lunch together recently at my home... Do I see a future nuisance ethics complaint here?
-PJ
8
posted on
04/01/2009 2:56:13 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(You can never overestimate the Democrats' ability to overplay their hand.)
To: detective
Even Chris Matthews was RAILING about the Injustice of this! Ted Stevens had written on a letter to the contractor to make sure that he got billed for the ENTIRE job, so as not to end up in trouble like Bob Toricelli....and the Justice Dept. hid it from the jury!!
9
posted on
04/01/2009 2:58:30 PM PDT
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion....the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: paul in cape
Read your Constituion - what she can do is investigate whether or not payments were made to individuals in the Justice Department in Alaska to do this, and then, if she can tie it to the winner, prosecute him.
Remember, the federales are not likely to prosecute any Democrats for this so it will have to be handled at the state level.
At the moment it looks pretty clear that someone took a payoff for political purposes.
10
posted on
04/01/2009 2:58:36 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: euram
Wow, Sarah Palin has a ton of courage to come out like this. Most governors would have done like W did to Scooter Libby and the border patrol agents.
11
posted on
04/01/2009 3:01:10 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: euram
Sorry...I’m a strong supporter of Sarah’s but I think she is wrong here. Steven’s is guilty. Charges were dismissed ‘cause of prosecution misconduct but Stevens still did the crime. Let him go gently into the night and don’t get any of his mud on you.
12
posted on
04/01/2009 3:01:10 PM PDT
by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: SolidWood
13
posted on
04/01/2009 3:01:17 PM PDT
by
kanawa
To: paul in cape
"
Any possibility she could void the last election and schedule a special election?" Only the courts can do that, but she has standing to demand that they hear her.
14
posted on
04/01/2009 3:03:51 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: euram
Noting Stevens’ age, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said, “He’s already been punished enough.”
The above quote from a Washington Post article. Reid has aboslutely no honor within himself.
15
posted on
04/01/2009 3:04:19 PM PDT
by
deport
To: euram
” It is unfortunate that, as a result of the questionable proceedings which led to Senator Stevens conviction days before the election, Alaskans lost an esteemed statesman on Capitol Hill. His presence is missed.”
****************
Oh my.
16
posted on
04/01/2009 3:04:52 PM PDT
by
VinL
(VinL---It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
To: Ann Archy
Chris Matthews was very critical of Sen. Stevens when he was still in office. Now that it’s over he finally starts to see the injustice. Democratic Senators wouldn’t let Bush fire Justice Dept. attorneys. If those attorneys had known they would be fired for misconduct, I wonder if they would have gone after Stevens.
To: euram
if it was mr and mrs average america, the prosecutor would NEVER have caved like this. The chief would have just allowed the mistake to die in jail.
18
posted on
04/01/2009 3:11:40 PM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Drango
So it is not true as posted above that Stevens had written the contractor to make sure all charges were included and the prosecutor hid the letter?
19
posted on
04/01/2009 3:15:33 PM PDT
by
libbylu
(Sarah - the light of the midnight sun)
To: mono
Everyone has to learn how to connect the dots! It is a mistake to presume the the DOJ was “Bush’s”. Bush only chose the people at the top. Remember that Bush had already been “put on notice” with all the press from his firing a few U.S. Attorney’s. If he had stepped in to protect Stevens he would have been accused of political meddling.
Does anyone know if the U.S. Attorney involved had even been a Bush appointee, or were they a holdover from Clinton?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson