Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/01/2009 12:24:43 AM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bruinbirdman

Wait a damned minute....

If the Obama rule about receiving taxpayer paid “bailouts” leads to loss of privacy of business decisions -— then why is this broodmare entitled to any privacy related to her taxpayer funded baby manufacturing fetish?

She has the right to privacy - ONLY if she’s paying her own way..
Once she becomes a “ward of the state”, then the taxpayers have a right to know exactly what we’re paying for and why.


2 posted on 04/01/2009 12:57:51 AM PDT by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

She should have been fired for having a uterus.

Hard to imagine any scenario that would end up good for those children, but who knows, maybe she’ll catch Brads eye?

IMHO somebody in the staff should have been fired way damn long before now, like the dude handling the turkey baster maybe?


5 posted on 04/01/2009 2:58:02 AM PDT by djf (If Congress was a business, they'd all be in jail by now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

I have just 2 words for you: Joe the Plumber - Joe Biden


7 posted on 04/01/2009 4:55:16 AM PDT by TangoLimaSierra (To the left the truth looks Right-Wing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson