To: bruinbirdman
Wait a damned minute....
If the Obama rule about receiving taxpayer paid “bailouts” leads to loss of privacy of business decisions -— then why is this broodmare entitled to any privacy related to her taxpayer funded baby manufacturing fetish?
She has the right to privacy - ONLY if she’s paying her own way..
Once she becomes a “ward of the state”, then the taxpayers have a right to know exactly what we’re paying for and why.
2 posted on
04/01/2009 12:57:51 AM PDT by
river rat
(Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: river rat
3 posted on
04/01/2009 1:15:56 AM PDT by
happygrl
(BORG: Barack 0bama Resistance Group: we will not be assimilated)
To: river rat
Maybe it's because she's produced 8 new fatherless, dependent democrats all in one pop? She's become a model for "the state" now...a protected figure.
4 posted on
04/01/2009 1:53:55 AM PDT by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson