Posted on 03/19/2009 12:49:52 PM PDT by redk
Sarah Palin is seeking the advice of a Scientologist as she plots her 2012 presidential run, which just makes sense to us.
John P. Coale, a prominent Washington lawyer and power-broker, is secretly running Palin's political action committee and working to "protect the Palin brand," according to the Washington Post. He is very, very good at doing that because he can walk through walls and read minds and leave his body and never gets sick because he is a Scientologist.
(Excerpt) Read more at gawker.com ...
“I thought Arnold and his wife were Catholic (they definitly were at the time they married.) Did I miss a conversion somehwere?”
Had read sometime back that he was; if I’m wrong, I stand corrected.
Perhaps it’s because he is a liberal and a big Dem contributor?
http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/john-coale.asp?cycle=08
Well before she even imagined a McCain ticket, she did nothing about sanctuary cities in her state. She has been in no hurry since the election to clear up her position.
I like her and think she was and is being treated unfairly, but I do not see her as a leader nor exactly what I would want in a president. It doesn’t matter I suppose, it will be her own demographic (women) that go after her the hardest and will sink her. My thinking is if Romney, Huckabee and Palin stay out of the 2012 run, we will all be the better for it.
I have no idea if he’s really her “top PR adviser” or anything of the sort, but if you don’t understand why it would be a problem for her to hire a Scientologist for such a position, you urgently need to read up on Scientology. It’s a sophisticated and ruthless organized crime network, and any politician who would knowingly hire a member of it, belongs at the top of the “do not vote for” list. Palin is certainly naive enough to UNknowingly hire a Scientologist, and if that’s what happened, I expect he’ll be her ex-PR adviser very, very soon.
I know a lot more about $cientology than you can imagine, but I also believe in the individual and I know individual motivations trump whatever the group may believe. This is not a religious position (and you are right, ‘top’ PR may be wrong, it isn’t specified).. The key is choosing the best individual for the job, I trust her judgment and his reputation in this.
So, are you stating that "religious" activities (like "disconnection," "fair game," "RPF" and charging over $300,000 for education of the OTIII secret story of "Xenu") should be legally protected?
She had better do it sooner rather than later.
He’d better practice harder...he’s getiing some parts way wrong.
I’m not going to get into an argument with you, just to be pulled into a defensive position over my chosen religion.
All I will say is that there is a lot of false data about Scientology on the internet and elsewhere. I’ve been a church member for 35 years, and can attest to that.
You won’t know what it really is, unless you pick up a Scientology book and read it for yourself. Everything else is just hearsay.
And, if you want to know how the average Scientologist feels about being an American, read my profile.
So, the standard for nominees of our party now is that they’ve never asked someone from another religion for non-religious advice in a field the non-Christian is an expert in?
Well done, sir - worthy of a Va gentleman.
So who would you propose?
“But what else do you expect from the libs, they are just following the Rules for Radicals theme by Saul Alinsky, find the target, freeze it, and impose as many distractions they can find so that no one sees what is going on in front of them.”
That is very apparent to anyone who hasn’t drunk the poison liberal Kool-Aid.
Sadly, a person has a difficult time seeing this from inside the perimeter fence of the liberal mind control plantation.
I know, because I was born and raised behind that razor wire.
Well said and I applaud your taking the high road. We could all profit from being a little more inclusive, here.
Ever read mission earth?
Hubbard lays out the foundation for construction of a false religion to control the powerful elite...long before he dreamt up dyanetics...
I dont know what you found there....but I read damn near everything hubbard wrote as a sci-fi fan....he went nuts while writting it...it just got more and more whacked until he believed his own stuff...
One common theme in even battle field earth....”leverage,blackmail and coersion”...he delighted in it as a plot line through his sci-fi novels....it’s literally dripping with it...
He spun a good yarn...but his beliefs where quite whacked at the end..
Straight up...
Thanks, TG. I’ve stayed at FR for years because of the general high quality of the people here. It worries me a bit when I see that start to slip. We’re better people than that.
You should read Hubbard’s other works if you want to credibly comment on them.
Straight up...
Congratulations on the escape.
Excerpts below, seem to indicate that activities of Greta Van Susteren and John P. Coal, resembles PR goals for infiltration of "opinion leaders," VIP's and the government, as originally set out by Scientology's founder.
"The goal of the Department is to bring the government and hostile philosophies or societies into a state of complete compliance with the goals of Scientology. This is done by high level ability to control and in its absence by low level ability to overwhelm. Introvert such agencies. Control such agencies. Scientology is the only game on Earth where everybody wins."
L. Ron Hubbard, HCO Policy Letter of 15 August 1960, "DEPT OF GOVT AFFAIRS"
"Once the world is Clear - a nation, a state, a city or a village - the Scientology organization in the area becomes its government! And once this has taken place the only policy accepted as valid is Scientology policy."
L. Ron Hubbard, from a lecture entitled "Future Org Trends" given January 9th, 1962
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.