Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's speaks again of a National Civilian Security Force
various -- see body | 12 March 2009 | bvw

Posted on 03/12/2009 5:47:50 PM PDT by bvw

Excerpts from Obama's speech today at the dedication of Abraham Lincoln Hall at the National Defense University in Washington, D.C.:

"The attacks of 9/11 signaled the new dangers of the 21st century. And today, our people are still threatened by violent extremists ...

Yet terrorism and extremism make up just one part of the many challenges that confront our nation. ... A historic economic downturn has put at stake the prosperity that underpins our strength, while putting at risk the stability of governments and the survival of people around the world. ... Poverty, disease, the persistence of conflict and genocide in the 21st century challenge our international alliances, partnerships and institutions -- and must call on all of us to reexamine our assumptions.

These are the battlefields of the 21st century. These are the threats that we now face. And in these struggles, the United States of America must succeed -- and we will succeed.

We also know that the old approaches won't meet the challenges of our time. ... No army -- no matter how strong -- can eliminate every adversary. No weapon -- no matter how powerful -- can erase the hatred that lies in someone's heart.

So it falls to institutions like this -- and to individuals like you -- to help us understand the world as it is, to develop the capacities that we need to confront emerging danger, and to act with purpose and pragmatism to turn this moment of peril into one of promise. That's how we will find new pathways to peace and security. That is the work that we must do.

Now, make no mistake: This nation will maintain our military dominance. ...

But we also need to look beyond this conventional advantage as we develop the new approaches and new capabilities of the 21st century -- and in that effort, this university must play a critical role.

America must also balance and integrate all elements of our national power. We cannot continue to push the burden on to our military alone, nor leave dormant any aspect of the full arsenal of American capability. And that's why my administration is committed to renewing diplomacy as a tool of American power, and to developing our civilian national security capabilities. This effort takes place within the walls of this university, where civilians sit alongside soldiers in the classroom. And it must continue out in the field, where American civilians can advance opportunity, enhance governance and the rule of law, and attack the causes of war around the world. We have to enlist our civilians in the same way that we enlist those members of the armed services in understanding this broad mission that we have.

Well, here's an excerpt from a related FR thread from four weeks ago:

A little-publicized Department of Defense Directive (Number 1404.10) establishes a "DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce" and rescinds a prior directive dealing with the emergency use of civilian personnel.

The new 1404.10, dated January 23, 2009 -- just three days after the inauguration -- is effective immediately, and cancels the prior directive of the same designation ("Emergency-Essential (E-E) DoD U.S. Citizen Civilian Employees"), that was issued in 1992 under President Clinton. The 1992 directive specifically deals with overseas deployments of civilian personnel, and mentions the term "overseas" no fewer than 33 times.

The new directive does not mention the term "overseas" in the body of the directive even once. The word "overseas" appears in the new Directive 4 times: once as as a reference; once to describe a database "code"; once to describe the code values; and once in the Glossary. In other words, the new Directive doesn't apply to the overseas deployment of civilians at all, but applies to their deployment in the United States mainland.

The previous Directive does not mention "restoration of order" or "stability operations." These operations are prominently featured in the new directive. In fact, these functions are central to the mission of Obama's new DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce:

Members of the DoD Civilian Expeditionary Workforce shall be organized, trained, cleared, equipped, and ready to deploy in support of combat operations by the military; contingencies; emergency operations; humanitarian missions; disaster relief; restoration of order; drug interdiction; and stability operations of the Department of Defense in accordance with DoDD 3000.05...

While the directive suggest that the DoD will seek volunteers, Section 4 (d), subsection {e} paragraph 2 states: Management retains the authority to direct and assign civilians either voluntarily, involuntarily, or on an unexpected basis to accomplish the DoD mission.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho44; brownshirts; cnsf; fascism; nationalpoliceforce; possecomitatus; randcorp; securityforce; stabilitypoliceforce
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
I heard Mark Levin mention this speech, so I'd though I'd tie a few things together.

The Obama speech today can be found at: http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2009/03/obama_pays_trib_1.html

1 posted on 03/12/2009 5:47:50 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bvw

ping


2 posted on 03/12/2009 5:49:17 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unkus

AKA BROWNSHIRTS


3 posted on 03/12/2009 5:50:00 PM PDT by Radl (rtr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bvw

Don’t we have them and they are called the National Guard?


4 posted on 03/12/2009 5:51:30 PM PDT by edcoil (Slave owners could justify themselves too. Think about it Arnold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw

This is why we have a local and state police force. We don’t need Acorn becoming the American Basij, although I’m sure this is what 0 is looking to do.


5 posted on 03/12/2009 5:51:30 PM PDT by Batman11 ("Big ears isn't my President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw

It’s coming.


6 posted on 03/12/2009 5:51:42 PM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ("It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw

What was Obama's response to the 911 Atrocities on that date?


7 posted on 03/12/2009 5:51:48 PM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw

Great idea!!!We can line them up across the southern border and have them build a wall...one Obama brick at a time...!!!


8 posted on 03/12/2009 5:53:22 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw

I’m really becoming convinced this guy is a Nazi.


9 posted on 03/12/2009 5:55:49 PM PDT by NewHampshireDuo (Earth - Taking care of itself since 4.6 billion BC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

“I will need to see your papers before you can pass this checkpoint. Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the Republican Party?”


10 posted on 03/12/2009 5:56:24 PM PDT by 230FMJ (...from my cold, dead, fingers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bvw

Brownshirts, faded redcoats to me.


11 posted on 03/12/2009 5:56:29 PM PDT by Eye of Unk (How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words! SA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw

Bring it. Seriously.


12 posted on 03/12/2009 5:57:09 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoosier-Daddy

You’d better believe it. Why are people so surprised at Hussein’s actions when he tells us in advance?


13 posted on 03/12/2009 5:58:02 PM PDT by Dapper 26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: unkus

We already have a civilian security force. The armed citizens in America outnumber the police, security, and the army, navy, air force and marines all put together.

PS, we sympathize and are like the majority of the police and military, we love America and need no civilian security force. We are a security force that can and will defend against anything that may threaten our right to life, liberty, and our pursuit of happiness.


14 posted on 03/12/2009 5:58:31 PM PDT by 2ndClassCitizen (NAACP=National Association Against Caucasian People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

Indeed.


15 posted on 03/12/2009 5:58:53 PM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Fight Crime. Shoot Back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bvw

What a moron!

no amount of money or civil obama force will ever stamp out hate....

try again BamBam- thanks for playing


16 posted on 03/12/2009 6:01:36 PM PDT by eeevil conservative (GIVE ME A PLACE TO STAND AND I WILL MOVE THE EARTH....Archimedes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw

If I didn’t know better I would think that FUBO is purposely trying to start a revolution


17 posted on 03/12/2009 6:02:58 PM PDT by clamper1797 (Zero parcus dies Nero Totus hail FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw

OBAMA = One Big A$$ Mistake America


18 posted on 03/12/2009 6:03:56 PM PDT by Noahs Rook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw

I hope BHOle issues them Kevlar, we wouldn’t want to have any of them get Seriously hurt invading the Hood.
Will the Press ask him what the hell he’s talking about ?
No details in the Speech means nobody can figure out what he talking about.
He still thinks he is getting DONATIONS for Campaign Speeches ?


19 posted on 03/12/2009 6:04:22 PM PDT by 4Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw

He just keeps on with this National Civilian “Security” Force. I fear that it will just turn out to be ACORN at the voting polls in uniform. This is all very strange.


20 posted on 03/12/2009 6:05:54 PM PDT by Twinkie (Obama is NOT Reagan !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson