Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

They're not "Liberals," they're "Neo-Marxists," and it's time we made the label stick

Posted on 03/12/2009 1:26:19 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

The Left has beat us at the game of semantics for decades: re-branding firearms as "assault weapons," passing off media censorship as "fairness," transmogrifying abortion into "choice," etc., etc., etc.

They're naked now. There is no denying that what Barack Obama-Soros is doing is transforming our capitalist democracy into a socialist dictatorship.

Let's make them live with what they are.

Let's brand them with the term "Neo-Marxists" the way they branded us with the term "Neo-Cons."

I'm sick of them calling the shots.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: marxism; neomarxists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 03/12/2009 1:26:19 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Zping for later...


2 posted on 03/12/2009 1:27:52 PM PDT by Wildbill22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’m simply calling them communists - they get the point immediately.


3 posted on 03/12/2009 1:28:53 PM PDT by newfreep ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." - P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

something about the tree of liberty


4 posted on 03/12/2009 1:29:08 PM PDT by usshadley (crying racism--the new "last refuge of the scoundrel")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I agree. Calling them socialists is sugar coating it.


5 posted on 03/12/2009 1:29:56 PM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Aye!


6 posted on 03/12/2009 1:30:30 PM PDT by a fool in paradise ("I certainly hope he (Bush) doesnÂ’t succeed" - Democratic strategist James Carville 9-11-2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

We already know that O does not like to be called a socialist, and the nicest way to term it.


7 posted on 03/12/2009 1:31:26 PM PDT by BuffaloJack (To stand up for Capitalism is to hope Obama fails.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

If you want to REALLY tweak them,

call them FASCISTS.

And you can set them up, too, by first referring to them as socialists. They’ll deny that, and then you can concede, “yes, you’re right, the policies the left advocates are not so much socialist as they are fascist. Sorry, I should have clarified that.”


8 posted on 03/12/2009 1:33:42 PM PDT by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Hugo Castro


9 posted on 03/12/2009 1:35:56 PM PDT by Paladin2 (No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

What if they say “if Marxism means that people get affordable health care, than I’m a Marxist!”

Be ready to have true stories handy of what health care is like in Sweden, England, and Canada.

Make liberals—neo-Marxists—defend the idea of bureaucrats making health care decisions.


10 posted on 03/12/2009 1:36:27 PM PDT by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Something I’d like to see raised is the fact that 0bama won’t look us in the eye. I think that would strike a chord with everyone that sees him on TV. Many people say “well, he’s reading his teleprompters”. But, a teleprompter could be put where he could appear to be looking at us through the camera. 0 won’t do that. The truth is he’s so used to looking at only 2 teleprompters on either side of him that he if he tried to place one where it appears he’s looking at us, it would throw him off...he couldn’t do it.

If lots of people started asking “why won’t 0bama look us in the eye” it would resonate. People would think back over EVERY time they’ve seen him on TV and realize he NEVER looks us in the eye.

my 2¢


11 posted on 03/12/2009 1:37:14 PM PDT by mreerm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Nothing new about their Marxist ideas. They’re just Marxists.


12 posted on 03/12/2009 1:37:38 PM PDT by Sir Gawain ("Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Actually they are retro-marxists.


13 posted on 03/12/2009 1:37:48 PM PDT by Paladin2 (No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Works for me!


14 posted on 03/12/2009 1:38:16 PM PDT by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Forget the “neo”; they’re just plain Marxists — the same Marxists that have been around since the first one.


15 posted on 03/12/2009 1:38:29 PM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Nepolean fries the idea powder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mreerm
That's an interesting observation.

A video demonstrating it would come in handy.

16 posted on 03/12/2009 1:38:41 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Only after disaster can we be resurrected." -- Tyler Durden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: newfreep
I’m simply calling them communists - they get the point immediately.

DITTO for me!

Last week a young voter did not know what a liberal was.
I asked her if she knew who Karl Marx was...blank stare and a "no"

17 posted on 03/12/2009 1:38:41 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I don’t think they are Neo anything. I think they are straight out and out Marxists.


18 posted on 03/12/2009 1:39:25 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"Neo-Marxists"

Please define this term for us.

19 posted on 03/12/2009 1:39:43 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I prefer the term, “dirty pinko commies”.


20 posted on 03/12/2009 1:39:57 PM PDT by OB1kNOb (Communist China is doing more to foster capitalism in their country than our politicians are doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson