1 posted on
03/11/2009 5:53:17 PM PDT by
SJackson
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume
If you'd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
----------------------------
Even the Washington Post gets it.
What's striking about the charges by Mr. Freeman and like-minded conspiracy theorists is their blatant disregard for such established facts. Mr. Freeman darkly claims that "it is not permitted for anyone in the United States" to describe Israel's nefarious influence. But several of his allies have made themselves famous (and advanced their careers) by making such charges -- and no doubt Mr. Freeman himself will now win plenty of admiring attention. Crackpot tirades such as his have always had an eager audience here and around the world. The real question is why an administration that says it aims to depoliticize U.S. intelligence estimates would have chosen such a man to oversee them.
2 posted on
03/11/2009 5:55:25 PM PDT by
SJackson
(a tax cut is non-targetedÂ…no guaranteeÂ…theyÂ’re free to invest anywhere that they want, J Kerry)
To: SJackson
A gust of flatulence from the Saudi's favorite bloated buttboy. Yeah, I really trusted this jerkwater to provide objective, impartial intel to our president(Not that he would have cared or known the difference.)
To: SJackson
And another one bites the dust. LOL
4 posted on
03/11/2009 5:57:42 PM PDT by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: SJackson
Hussein tried to install an enemy of America into intelligence?
God help us.
To: SJackson
Isn’t it telling that this administration, which received unprecedented levels of transition cooperation from President Bush, still can’t get it right?
By contrast, President Bush was thrown in without a “honeymoon” or much help (and perhaps more than one act of hindrance) from the outgoing Clinton people in 2000 , and did a far better job putting a team together than the lightweight we have now has done.
6 posted on
03/11/2009 6:04:30 PM PDT by
DemforBush
(Somebody wake me when sanity has returned to the nation.)
To: SJackson
No, Ambassador, it all stems from the crudely obvious fact that you, sir, are an anti-Semitic sack o' shit and an eager, vocal butt puppet for the throat-slitting Wahhabi Lobby.
7 posted on
03/11/2009 6:04:31 PM PDT by
Viking2002
(The Occupation has begun. God help America.)
To: SJackson
He can blame the Jews. He doesn’t like the Jews and the Jews don’t like him
11 posted on
03/11/2009 6:16:25 PM PDT by
dennisw
(0bomo the subprime president)
To: SJackson
Obama, once again, demonstrating what he keeps denying.
18 posted on
03/11/2009 9:11:30 PM PDT by
M. Espinola
(Freedom is not 'free'.)
To: SJackson
This guy bootlicks the Saudis and the Chicoms, and he thinks the Israel lobby has conflicted loyalties? Honestly, if The Lobby had anything to do with this guy getting run...thanks, guys. Good job.
19 posted on
03/11/2009 9:20:27 PM PDT by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson