Really a waste of time and money. Poll on Webpage.
1 posted on
03/08/2009 10:37:32 AM PDT by
Dallas59
To: Dallas59
2 posted on
03/08/2009 10:41:06 AM PDT by
null and void
(We are now in day 45 of our national holiday from reality.)
To: Dallas59
Well, they steal the jobs that ‘nobody wants’ now they want to steal real estate fees on transactions that will occur through the 800 Billion Dollar buyouts which will churn housing.
3 posted on
03/08/2009 10:41:22 AM PDT by
Gaffer
To: Dallas59
Somebody needs to kick the sh*t out of teh idiot who filed this.
4 posted on
03/08/2009 10:42:13 AM PDT by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: Dallas59
Remax needs a public spanking!
5 posted on
03/08/2009 10:43:43 AM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: Dallas59
IIRC the standard is “will it cause confusion in the mind of the consumer”.
98+% of those responding to the poll say no.
Gotta go with the majority on this one...
6 posted on
03/08/2009 10:44:20 AM PDT by
null and void
(We are now in day 45 of our national holiday from reality.)
To: Dallas59
Adam Scoville, Re/Max's legal counsel, said he can explain. First of all, both names start with "r" and have logos with accent lines near the letter "e," he said. "It goes beyond that," Scoville added. "If you chop the top off of the 'h,' you (almost) have the 'm' in Re/Max. The next letter is an 'a,' and if you take the 'v' then you have half of an 'x.' " Mr Scoville may be excused for attempting to explain his theory after six double Dewar's rocks one night.
Next week: Scoville goes on Sesame Street to explain how an A can become a B, a B can become a C and so on.
7 posted on
03/08/2009 10:44:49 AM PDT by
relictele
To: Dallas59
When I voted, it was 98% No, and 1% Yes. Loser pays would cure this.
To: Dallas59
Re/Max = stupid on a stick
9 posted on
03/08/2009 10:52:52 AM PDT by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: Dallas59
Well other than both names starting with re that is the only similarity I can see. And one of the names has a hyphen over the re which further makes a difference. Don't get this one at all.
To: Dallas59
I am going to sue Firefox since they clearly have used my Freedumb2003 name.
Look, they both start with an “F”, they both have vowels and the letter “r” and if you replace the “2003” with “fox” they are clearly confusing to anyone.
11 posted on
03/08/2009 10:53:41 AM PDT by
freedumb2003
(Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks.)
To: Dallas59
To: Dallas59
It’ll come down to the origin of the name. If it’s a created name, rather than belonging to a principal or something, they may have an issue, silly as it sounds.
It’s really just harrassment over the commission structure. But, Re/Max wouldn’t benefit at all from filing a genuinely frivolous lawsuit.
To: Dallas59
gee, i can hardly see the difference.....
15 posted on
03/08/2009 11:06:13 AM PDT by
Always Right
(Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
To: Dallas59
Re/Max, a national real estate franchise, is challenging the agency's filing, saying the Rehava name and logo design are too similar to its own. In other news, Fidel Castro has filed suit against Mark Cuban.
20 posted on
03/08/2009 11:22:10 AM PDT by
Polybius
To: Dallas59
Remax’s attorney needs some sanctions.
23 posted on
03/08/2009 12:24:01 PM PDT by
PAR35
To: Dallas59
Yes yes! I see it! The plagerized logo has straight lines and angles, just like the Remax logo!
24 posted on
03/08/2009 3:55:36 PM PDT by
ViLaLuz
(2 Chronicles 7:14)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
