A dispute has erupted over a trademark request filed by Rehava Real Estate Store, a small agency in North Charleston.
Posted on 03/08/2009 10:37:32 AM PDT by Dallas59
A dispute has erupted over a trademark request filed by Rehava Real Estate Store, a small agency in North Charleston.
Re/Max, a national real estate franchise, is challenging the agency's filing, saying the Rehava name and logo design are too similar to its own.
Rehava said it sees little if any resemblance.
"When I first got this case, I went back and double-checked to make sure I had the right file because they don't even look similar to me," said Rehava attorney Doug Kim.
Adam Scoville, Re/Max's legal counsel, said he can explain.
First of all, both names start with "r" and have logos with accent lines near the letter "e," he said.
"It goes beyond that," Scoville added. "If you chop the top off of the 'h,' you (almost) have the 'm' in Re/Max. The next letter is an 'a,' and if you take the 'v' then you have half of an 'x.' "
Steve deGuzman, Rehava's broker-in-charge, said he doesn't buy it. He said the trademark challenge is harassment and a form of corporate bullying that will cost his firm thousands of dollars.
"It's a huge distraction, particularly for a startup and also in this kind of a market," deGuzman said.
He suspects the Colorado-based franchise is challenging the trademarkbecause of Rehava's controversial commission rebates, which some in the industry see as a threat to traditional compensation standards.
Rehava's commission structure stemmed from a 2006 change in state law that allowed real estate agents to offer rebates to home buyers.
The U.S. Justice Department has pushed for similar changes across the country.
Rehava promises to give back half of its commission to buyers at the closing table, which could result in a return of several thousand dollars.
"I think they did it because they're worried about the future of real estate, and they really know that we might be onto something," deGuzman said.
"Anything they could do to slow us down would be to their advantage."
Scoville denies that their complaint has anything to do with Rehava's business model.
"We don't want someone offering the same services with a confusingly similar mark," Scoville said. "We're happy to compete with them, we just don't want to do it with a trademark similar to Re/Max."
Since Rehava opened last summer, it has received some nasty feedback, mostly from veteran agents who were not aware of the change in state law, deGuzman said.
One agent even filed a grievance against the company with the Charleston Trident Association of Realtors.
Rehava filed its trademark application last spring.
Officials at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office checked their records to make sure the Rehava name wasn't too similar to existing trademark names, which they later determined it wasn't.
Last fall the federal agency posted its findings, giving outsiders the opportunity to object before the trademark was finalized.
That's when Re/Max filed its formal complaint.
The patent office's trademark trial and appeal board will likely make a determination in the case in the spring of 2010.
words fail me.
Well, they steal the jobs that ‘nobody wants’ now they want to steal real estate fees on transactions that will occur through the 800 Billion Dollar buyouts which will churn housing.
Somebody needs to kick the sh*t out of teh idiot who filed this.
Remax needs a public spanking!
IIRC the standard is “will it cause confusion in the mind of the consumer”.
98+% of those responding to the poll say no.
Gotta go with the majority on this one...
Mr Scoville may be excused for attempting to explain his theory after six double Dewar's rocks one night.
Next week: Scoville goes on Sesame Street to explain how an A can become a B, a B can become a C and so on.
When I voted, it was 98% No, and 1% Yes. Loser pays would cure this.
Re/Max = stupid on a stick
I am going to sue Firefox since they clearly have used my Freedumb2003 name.
Look, they both start with an “F”, they both have vowels and the letter “r” and if you replace the “2003” with “fox” they are clearly confusing to anyone.
It’ll come down to the origin of the name. If it’s a created name, rather than belonging to a principal or something, they may have an issue, silly as it sounds.
It’s really just harrassment over the commission structure. But, Re/Max wouldn’t benefit at all from filing a genuinely frivolous lawsuit.
gee, i can hardly see the difference.....
I can’t even go out anymore without people taking pictures of me!
You need a better rug.
If this is how Re/Max is going to waste its money there are other RE agencies to go with.
Why would anyone do business with a corporation like Re/Max? Should you have a small, trivial dispute with them, they will likely escalate, make it major and sue you.
In other news, Fidel Castro has filed suit against Mark Cuban.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.