Posted on 03/07/2009 8:52:01 PM PST by Kaslin
All we're getting is whispers from the press, of course, A raised eyebrow here, a sad shake of the head there. But the picture that is emerging of Barack Obama, the executive, is not very flattering if you look between the lines.
Jennifer Rubin:
Well, it's becoming obvious he's not really much of a manager, decider, legislation-craftsman, or supervisor. His vetting process is in shambles and key Treasury slots are still vacant. His Treasury Secretary is a classic under-performer and Obama encourages that tendency by talking about everything other than our immediate recovery needs. He lets Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid do the legislating - and they've come up with an embarrassing stimulus and an omnibus spending-bill even Democrats aren't swallowing.
What does he like to do? Summits. These are in essence campaign events - faux town-halls where nary a discouraging word is heard and no real work is done. And he loves those campaign rallies around the country.
So if the report is accurate that others are crafting his political strategy (just like the Pelosi-Reid machine is drafting his legislation), it should should come as no surprise. George W. Bush was lambasted for poor management skills and excessive delegation. But that was nothing - Obama has delegated the entire task of governing. He will keep the campaigning for himself.
Miner's firm specialized in civil rights litigation and in representing not-for-profits. "The 'game of law' irritated [Obama] more than fascinated him," Miner says. "There are people who just like the game. Barack didn't like the game."
Allison Davis, a former partner in Miner's firm (and the son of a prominent U. of C. professor), occupied an office next to Obama's at 14 West Erie Street. "He spent a lot of time working on his book [Dreams from My Father]," Davis recalls. "Some of my partners weren't happy with that, Barack sitting there with his keyboard on his lap and his feet up on the desk writing the book."
After weeks of arduous negotiations, on April 6, 2006, a bipartisan group of senators burst out of the "President's Room," just off the Senate chamber, with a deal on new immigration policy.
As the half-dozen senators -- including John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Edward M. KennedySen.. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), who made a request common when Capitol Hill news conferences are in the offing: "Hey, guys, can I come along?" And when Obama went before the microphones, he was generous with his list of senators to congratulate -- a list that included himself.
"I want to cite Lindsey Graham, Sam Brownback, Mel Martinez, Ken Salazar, myself, Dick Durbin, Joe Lieberman . . . who've actually had to wake up early to try to hammer this stuff out," he said.
To Senate staff members, who had been arriving for 7 a.m. negotiating sessions for weeks, it was a galling moment. Those morning sessions had attracted just three to four senators a side, Sen.. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) recalled, each deeply involved in the issue. Obama was not one of them. But in a presidential contest involving three sitting senators, embellishment of legislative records may be an inevitability, Specter said with a shrug.
Unlike governors, business leaders or vice presidents, senators -- the last to win the presidency was John F. Kennedy in 1960 -- are not executives. They cannot be held to account for the state of their states, their companies or their administrations. What they do have is the mark they leave on the nation's laws -- and in Obama's brief three-year tenure, as well as Sen.. Hillary Rodham Clinton's seven-year hitch, those marks are far from indelible.
(D-Mass.) -- headed to announce their plan, they met
Barack Obama today boasted about a bill in "my committee,'' a committee on which he has no seat.
While speaking to the press in the Israeli town of Sderot, Obama mistakenly put the U.S. Senate banking committee on his resume, although the Illinois senator does not serve on the committee and Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) is the chairman.
The Republican National Committee distributed an e-mail pointing out Obama's mistake with a subject line of "Obama's Gaffe Machine Rolls Into Israel."
During the press conference, Obama said, "Just this past -- this past week, we passed out of the U.S. Senate Banking Committee, which is my committee, a bill to call for divestment from Iran as a way of ratcheting up the pressure to ensure that they don't obtain a nuclear weapon."
In the State Senate, Jones did something even more important for Obama. He pushed him forward as the key sponsor of some of the Party's most important legislation, even though the move did not sit well with some colleagues who had plugged away in the minority on bills that Obama now championed as part of the majority. "Because he had been in the minority, Barack didn't have a legislative record to run on, and there was a buildup of all these great ideas that the Republicans kept in the rules committee when they were in the majority," Burns said. "Jones basically gave Obama the space to do what Obama wanted to do. Emil made it clear to people that it would be good for them."
"You have the power to make a United States senator," he told Emil Jones in 2003.
I just don't see it.
There's no there, there. He's an empty suit in it way over his head.
She knows. But she could not bring it up. It would be described as racist after all.
I think it’s a matter of time before he succumbs to his previous drug habit.
Things go from bad to worse. At least they don't get much better. The Repubs somehow grow a pair and manage to not trip over their own feet and take back the House. The stupidest thing they could do at that point would be to turn on Obama. The voters would be looking for answers, not vendettas. Better to ram conservatism down his throat. Then, seen as irrelevant, Bam-Bam gets his hiney kicked by Romney in 2012, along with gains in both houses. Then we spend 8 years cleaning this mess up.
Not a pretty picture, but unless you're planning on shooting your way into the White House...
Lazy String pullers?
You mean......because he’s Hapa Haole?
That makes me hopeful.
Well put!
grandiose sense of self-importance
preoccupation with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
belief that he or she is “special” and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)
need for excessive admiration
sense of entitlement
takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends
lack of empathy
envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her
arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes
Read more: “Narcissistic Personality Disorder NPD: Overview of Symptoms, Diagnosis and Prognosis of Clinical Narcissism” - http://narcissistic-personality.suite101.com/article.cfm/narcissistic_personality_disorder#ixzz098h5kjMI
One useful gauge is this: How often do you hear "How do you feel about (x)?" vs. "What do you think about (x)?"
Another one is the level of body piercing as young people struggle for individual identity in a meaningless world dominated by ephemeral images.
Another is to consider the Lincoln-Douglas debates which lasted hours, without any of the technological innovations that we know so well. How would these be received today? If unfavorably, ask yourself why.
That or sans Birth Documentation.
Personally, I think it is incompetance. His only real job, if you can call it that, was radical college professor.
Agreed 100%.
Let's face it, in the antebellum era, he would have been the house...person.
9 out of 9 then.
whew
Also, ask Obama what P/E means. He does not seem to know.
also shiftless.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.