Posted on 03/06/2009 2:44:41 PM PST by Delacon
Did you feel it? The political ground shifting beneath President Barack Obama since his speech last week to Congress? It's been downhill since and I'm not referring mainly to the Dow Jones record-setting dive. The pivot point of the shift was the speech, or rather what the speech did to the evolving public narrative of Obama.
Let's review:
* Since the first of the year, Rush Limbaugh's audience has exploded , according to Howard Kurtz of The Washington Post, even as his daily assaults on Obama have intensified. The conservative Talk Radio maestro has become the most listened-to radio personality in America since before Paul Harvey.
Demand for his air time hs suddenly become so intense, Limbaugh told The Examiner's Byron York earlier today, that his network sold 80 percent as much advertising in January 2009 as it did in all of 2008, and expects to sell-out the year by the end of March. That was before Obama and White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel launched an explicit counter-attack against Limbaugh that seems only to be making him bigger.
* Glenn Beck's imminently forgettable presence on CNN has been transformed, according to The Los Angeles Times, by his move to Fox News where his main theme has been variations on this question - What in Heaven's name does Barack Obama think he is doing to America? Beck has a tough time slot to win big ratings because he's in the middle of evening drive-time, but in a very short time at Fox his audience is now exceeded only by Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity.
* Obama remains personally popular with the public, but worries and even outright opposition to some of his cornerstone proposals is growing. Democrats in Congress are even beginning to express in public print their worries that Obama has reached too far with the $787 billion economic stimulus package, the $410 billion omnibus spending bill and the $3.6 trillion budget proposal (and the trillions more in additional bailouts, loan guarantees, "tax cuts" that are really just grants, and other spending accountrements of Leviathan Unleashed.
* A devastatng conservative case against Obama is coming together rapidly. Two influential columns this week tell the tale: On Thursday, Daniel Henninger offers this crucial observation in a WSJ piece otherwise devoted to asking why Republicans aren't more eagerly and quickly taking advantage of the fact the Obama Democrats have all but declared war on the 75 percent of the U.S. economy that is private:
"Beyond the stock market, there is a reason why, despite much goodwill toward his presidency, the Obama response to the faltering economy has left many feeling undone. There isn't much in his plan to stir the national soul. It's about "sacrifice" now so that we can live for a future of small electric cars and windmills. This may move the Democratic Party's faith communities, but it cannot revive a great nation. If the Democrats want to embrace market failure as a basis for their ideology, let them have it. As politics, it's a downer."
The second column appeared today in The Washington Post and was written by Charles Krauthammer. Obama's mastery of public speaking has served to deflect attention away from the details of what he is actually proposing, which is based, according to Krauthammer, on a fundamental deception: Obama summons vision of catastrophe that are the result of too little government regulation of the financial markets and he offers as a solution vastly more government regulation of .... health care, energy and education.
"The 'day of reckoning' has now arrived. And because 'it is only by understanding how we arrived at this moment that we'll be able to lift ourselves out of this predicament,' Obama has come to redeem us with his far-seeing program of universal, heavily nationalized health care; a cap-and-trade tax on energy; and a major federalization of education with universal access to college as the goal.
"Amazing. As an explanation of our current economic difficulties, this is total fantasy. As a cure for rapidly growing joblessness, a massive destruction of wealth, a deepening worldwide recession, this is perhaps the greatest non sequitur ever foisted upon the American people," Krauthammer said.
Worse, Krauthammer says, is that Obama tries to have it both ways, with the alleged errors of deregulation being compounded into the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression by America's failure to nationalize health care, shift our economy to alternative energy sources and give everybody a free pass to college.
In other words, Obama is trying to make the cause and the cure synonymous. "Clever politics, but intellectually dishonest to the core," Krauthammer said.
I would only disagree that the Obama deception represents a clever political strategy. The deception represents the fundamental flaw in the Obama strategy and indeed that of the Washington liberals who are racing to enact as much of their agenda as possible before the 2010 election.
The speech to Congress was the pivot point. Before the speech, Obama was protected by a kind of political equivalent of the Star Trek Shield. His symbolizing of an historic milestone, which alone moved millions of white voters to his column, combined with his soaring rhetoric, which negated any criticism from John McCain and other Republicans of the substance of Obama's proposals.
But the magnetism of the historicity of his moment began fading once the economic stimulus, the omnibus and the budget were on the table. As people focused more on the details and how they didn't square with what they thought he had promised during the campaign, the soaring rhetoric lost much of its power. It may even now be approaching a net negative because it throws so much more light on the inaequacies of the policies.
And so the ground has shifted and the essential narrative is changing. Before, supporting Obama was an act of personal and national affirmation made all the more attractive by the seeming reasonableness of his policy proposals. In short, Obama made himself a comfortable and reassuring choice because he made it "safe" to vote for him.
But now the mask is off and the disconnect between rhetoric and reality is emerging as the dominant driver of the Obama narrative. The contrast is no longer between the young, personable, historic candidate Obama and a creaky, cranky old Republican White Guy, it's between what America thought it was getting in a President Obama (cool, reasonable and above partisanship) and what it now sees as the reality of a President Obama (government spending out of control, broken promises, more bureaucrats, etc. etc.).
Put another way - not what we were promised.
We’ll see. Hussein is still adored by the non-thinking citizen. He still has million$ of dollar$, he still has a voter fraud machine, the government unions, and the devotion of the LameStream Media.
He will be difficult to defeat electorally—based on those factors.
Of course he is not able to win because of his stand on the issues, but that may not determine his staying power.
He is devoted to instituting Government Rule by HIM, and no one in the government is challenging him.
“A co-worker of my husband’s is the same. She listens to Quinn & Rose religiously (popular talk-radio morning show), and is registered Republican, but she voted for Obama, and can’t explain why either! What the heck?!”
It’s called mass hysteria. Read up on it. It’s what occurred and elected Obama.
It’s a bloodless coup. Keep spreading the word.
“I’m going to light up a cigar and have a beer tonight...”
- - -
I’m there, man.
There, fixed it.
bump
Hmmmm....sounds like a plan to me
“That was before Obama and White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel launched an explicit counter-attack against Limbaugh that seems only to be making him bigger.”
This is written as though Rush started the whole public battle, which Obama’s henchmen actually started last fall.
Like any would be dictator (remember the comment from that 0bamunist about how Comrade Zero would be ready to ‘rule’ from Day One?), 0bama is not about to back down, he is not about to moderate his positions, he is not about to do ANYthing that might suggest weakness to his political adversaries.
What he WILL do is to continue with, and intensify the extreme provocations, the leftist tilt, the conservative-baiting tactics, continued attempts to intimidate all those who won’t fall in line (i.e., David Brooks of the NYT, good example).
If it ISN’T possible for this illegal regime to push Americans into some sort of radical response which would in turn trigger a massive federal retaliation in the form of curfews, martial law, rounding up dissidents, especially dissidents with guns, putting those FEMA camps to work (note, Glenn Beck stated on FOX that he was UNABLE to debunk those FEMA detention camp rumors), if 0bama cannot figure out how to push the right buttons hard enough to elicit a violent response, he will direct that one be artifically created in order to justify a federal crackdown.
This is always the goal of every despot, every rogue regime; i.e., find a way to shut down or stifle dissent, and if the political opposition won’t take the bait, create a faux ‘opposition’ that will, in order to fully empower the dictatorship.
That is the only way out for 0bama, because he is psychologically unable to admit fault and to back down. If he is perceived as becoming weak this early in the game, he is politically finished, and he won’t accept that. He will instead seek to become ‘el Presidente for Life’.
Watch and see.
Nah, let slow Joe go too and we'll have just what America really needs - Bela Pelosi.
Nope, only Michele, my bell, is authentic.
“....articulate?”
Only with a teleprompter in front of him.
I mean, look at it from their standpoint: if you were to get "free" health care, subsidized mortgages, and reduced energy costs, all paid for by the powerless, yet productive minority, why would you give them a break?
They certainly haven't in California or any other state/country where they have gained power. No, you who are the serf who must pay homage to your liege lord, the all powerful state who has the force of law to take your property and earnings.
There's a reason why -0- has approval ratings over 60% and why his party will continue to win elections for the remaining future of this country's existence.
So forget about politics if you want to reclaim America. This is an economic battle, but as fate would have it, we control the purse strings. Starve the beast until the welfare state collapses. Save more, spend less.
Poll results are base on who and what questions are asked.
What do you think the results would be if this question was asked: "In light of today's unemployment figures, the obvious threat to your job it poses and the current downward spiral resulting in the loss of your savings, how do you view zer0's performance to date"?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.