Posted on 03/05/2009 6:07:01 PM PST by Kaslin
Will ending the culture wars be as difficult as repairing a broken economy?
If President Obama's primary task is to restore economic growth, he has also been waging a quiet, long-term campaign to ease the nation's divisions around religious and moral questions.
That venture, which has its roots in a 2006 speech that paid tribute to the political role of religious Americans, bore fruit in last year's election. Obama increased the Democratic share of the vote among Roman Catholics and younger evangelical Christians.
Since assuming the presidency, he has pressed this effort through persistent calls to personal and family responsibility, a pledge to continue social service partnerships between government and faith-based groups, and a promise to pursue policies to reduce the number of abortions.
But two of Obama's recent decisions underscored how brokering cultural peace will keep presenting him with ticklish challenges.
Last Friday, his administration signaled that it would alter the sweeping rules adopted at the end of the Bush administration allowing health care workers to decline to participate in actions that violate their moral or religious beliefs.
Such conscience protections have long applied to doctors, nurses and others who refuse to play any role in an abortion, and the administration has indicated it will maintain these safeguards. But it is likely to narrow the Bush regulation significantly so it doesn't get in the way of family planning services and fertility treatments.
(Excerpt) Read more at ibdeditorials.com ...
We survived Carter and Clinton. Both had disasterous policies (we are still paying for the mistakes of Jimmy Carter).
The solution is to get those who voted for Mr. Obama to voice their displeasure with his policies that differ from his campaign rhetoric.
When I see polls that show 80% support for Obama, I have to wonder where these 60% of convervatives (you know, 30% of the voting public) are that boost Obama’s policies. I don’t see it.
The media is shilling for Democrats. Same as always.
Was this the winner in a high-school writing contest?
The socialists in charge of the federal govt. are running full speed, trying to cram through as many of their anti-American ideas as they can under the cover of the "crisis." Of course the depth, breadth, and length of the crisis is their own intentional doing. They are going too far, too fast. There will be a backlash.
He is an idiot. He has his eminence grice handlers do all the "thinking" for him. He just parrots what they say.
That is why he seems so bizarrely all over the map. It depends on who last gave him orders -- ayers, wright or soros.
He is indeed
In a f’king pig’s eye he is.
Isn’t this what liberals do?
Correct. The new dividing lines are between the classes
Lately I’ve been playing the “George Costanza” opposite game with headlines and public proclamations. Whatever they say, I infer the opposite meaning.
For example, when Bernanke says “the government isn’t going to nationalize the banks,” I interpret that as him saying the banks WILL be nationalized, etc.
I’m finding that I’m not often surprised by the way things are developing.
If he was half the man his worshippers believe him to be he wouldn't need to use his portable teleprompter to read a prepared speech for every oration and presentation - even small gatherings in the White House.
The few times he has been caught without his teleprompter and a prepared speech he has shown what a blubbering, inarticulate empty suit he really is.
Obama can’t break the teleprompter habit
Rumors about Barack Obama’s addiction have crept around the capital for the last few weeks, but no one has wanted to explicitly report it until Politico did so this afternoon. Has Obama relapsed on smoking? Do his massive government spending plans indicate an acute gambling problem? No, in this case, Obama has another crutch: President Barack Obama doesn’t go anywhere without his TelePrompter.
The textbook-sized panes of glass holding the president’s prepared remarks follow him wherever he speaks. Resting on top of a tall, narrow pole, they flank his podium during speeches in the White House’s stately parlors. They stood next to him on the floor of a manufacturing plant in Indiana as he pitched his economic stimulus plan. They traveled to the Department of Transportation this week and were in the Capitol Rotunda last month when he paid tribute to Abraham Lincoln in six-minute prepared remarks.
Obama’s reliance on the teleprompter is unusual – not only because he is famous for his oratory, but because no other president has used one so consistently and at so many events large and small.
After the teleprompter malfunctioned a few times last summer and Obama delivered some less-than-soaring speeches, reports surfaced that he was training to wean himself off of the device while on vacation in Hawaii. But no luck.
This may be news to the throngs of Obamabots who elected him, but not to those of us who paid attention to Obama on the campaign trail. When he had the TelePrompters, he made crowds swoon. When he didn’t, though, things would go terribly wrong. Most of the fumbles on the campaign trail — such as Iran being a “tiny” and therefore no threat, America not being “what it once was”, came when Obama had to go off script. Once, his TelePrompter failed for a couple of moments and he stammered until someone apparently fixed it.
The abortionists definitely put themselves on thin ice in forcing me to participate in their activity ~ very thin ice.
I didn’t like Billy Jeff either, but compared to the 0, he was a lot better. He and the peanut farmer from Georgia tie as worst presidents
At the same time he's not connected upstairs ~
Think of him like Kelly Bundy. Either he can know how to use the teleprompter or he can study issues. There's only so much room, and if he uses the teleprompter frequently everything else is forgotten.
The Obamistas who worship this guy are even more dense and unconnected.
Obama thinks that Clinton’s mistake was that he didn’t push hard enough in the 2 years that the Democrats held all of the cards.
Clinton got cold feet and responded to public rejection of nationalized health care. (his first agenda item was “don’t ask, don’t tell” and that didn’t go over well either).
Obama’s first agenda item was to overturn a bunch of Bush executive orders.
I would love to see some red states figure out a way to engage in the state-level equivalent of civil disobedience against the fedgov. I don't know what that would be, but I would like to see. It would need to be something cunning that would expose Obama as a bullying tyrant and put him in a damned-if-you-do/damned-if-you-don't type position in reacting to it. Something like rejecting the stimulus money only bigger.
I don’t fully grasp your point but the Left would retort that they don’t support the war but have to fund “killing” as well.
There is no national defense in US taxpayers funding abortions in Mexico. Unless the president is willing to concede that killing babies in Mexico is one way to stifle immigration rates.
More could be done in just ending the “anchor baby” rule that permits illegal aliens (or “visitors”) to drop a baby in America and then appeal for US citizenship to raise their American baby.
And with the US funding abortion in Mexico, Mexican Catholics can probably even apply for sanctuary in the US under the issue that they are being “pressured” to have abortions that go against their religion.
and yay..the one saw a burning bush and then set about to walk on water after feeding thousands with just a loaf of bread..jeez..
He is exact the opposite, which is mealy mouthed
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.