Leave Britney alone!!!
Posted on 03/04/2009 9:17:31 AM PST by meandog
The respect is mutual, TAdams! Good people can disagree and be respectful about it, and shake hands!
I will read what you posted tomorrow.
============================================================
Conservatives like Jim Robinson do not want to see Romney in future presidential races, they can't make a career of that, they can only participate by doing things like posting facts here at Jim's forum.
The only career to be made is in promoting the career politician Mitt Romney, the 2012 election will be at least his 19th year of campaigning for office.
Like the post 32 said that you ignored, even though you were the one that wanted to use Michael Reagan as a source.
Welcome Back, Dad
I've been trying to convince my fellow conservatives that they have been wasting their time in a fruitless quest for a new Ronald Reagan to emerge and lead our party and our nation. I insisted that we'd never see his like again because he was one of a kind.
I was wrong!
MICHAEL REAGAN
The son of President Reagan wrote the following in Human Events:
Some Republicans insist that the only perfect candidate would be a clone of my Dad, Ronald Reagan. Aside from the fact that there is no such thing, it’s important to recognize that Ronald Reagan, as he often admitted, was anything but perfect.
One of the criticisms about former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney focuses on his record concerning the abortion issue. We are told by the modern day Diogenes clones that he can’t be trusted to fight abortion because he once, more or less, supported a woman’s right to butcher her baby.
It may come as a surprise to these purists, but Ronald Reagan once supported abortion too. Yet nobody ever questioned his strong pro-life credentials after his conversion to Republicanism. They accepted his sincerity. Why can’t they accept Mitt Romney’s?
Romney’s record shows he should be totally acceptable to all conservatives, yet because of one dubious question concerning the validity of his conversion to the pro-life side, he is deemed unsuitable to carry the conservative banner.
But then Michael Reagan had his mind blown and changed his mind, his dad has returned.The past is dead, we are interested in the future elections, nobody is interested in old losers like Romney.
Michael Reagan a YEAR AND A HALF LATER writing with great passion about CURRENT events.
Welcome Back, Dad
I've been trying to convince my fellow conservatives that they have been wasting their time in a fruitless quest for a new Ronald Reagan to emerge and lead our party and our nation. I insisted that we'd never see his like again because he was one of a kind.
I was wrong!
Michael Reagan and I are agreed that Governor Palin has his father's gift for appealing to the electorate. She might even generate MORE excitement, than Ronald Reagan did. But when Reagan ran for president, he had more maturity, experience and more knowledge than Governor Palin does now...the major difference. BTW, I like Governor Palin as much as I like Romney. She is extremely talented and has a better ability to bring together the base.
Romney however, has the exact experience we will need to get out of the financial nightmare Obama and the democrats are currently foisting upon us. He is an expert at getting companies OUT OF THE RED. We will be in desperate need of that kind of expertise in 2012.
You are obsessed with Romney and from your posts such as #23, your obsession seems mixed up with paranoia and religious identity.
I have to agree with Jim Robinson when he writes about Romney that “He’s one sick puppy”
WOW! We can't be CURRENT when it comes to Mitt Romney, we have to go back to 1993, but when it comes to Michael Reagan, current isn't even a year and a half ago.
Regardless of Michael Reagan's opinion of Governor Palin which I also share, it is doubtful Michael Reagan's opinion of Governor Romney has changed in the last year and a half. He may prefer Governor Palin as our presidential nominee. It will be interesting to see what he says in 2012.
You and your Mitthating cabal are on more threads hating and trashing Romney than I am on defending him. It doesn’t get any sicker than a hateful obssession.
I have to agree with Jim Robinson when he writes about Romney that “He’s one sick puppy”
Romney sucks. He is a liberal RINO. I don’t post anti-Romney threads but I think the more we have the better. We don’t need the likes of Romney in the party, we need to clean out all RINOs. The more threads about all the RINOs and what they really believe and the rules they live by, in the case of Romney his rules to live by depend on who he is talking to at the moment,the better so we can expose them and kick their tails out of the party.
I read your post a couple of times trying to read between the lines, I think that you were saying that Romney is not your favorite candidate right?
Kidding of course.
He isn’t a RINO. I have distinguised him in my posts above from the true Rinos in the party. If you think they are the same, then you are intellectually dishonest.
Leave Britney alone!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.