Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/19/2009 12:05:40 PM PST by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: lewisglad

Of course,sarah Palin...because she knows how to spend the people’s money....wisely and frugally. She don’t need no steeenking handouts!


2 posted on 02/19/2009 12:07:32 PM PST by gimme1ibertee ("No pale pastels,but bold colors".....Ronnie,we sure do miss you,sir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

There are a lot of double-entendres in that headline...


3 posted on 02/19/2009 12:08:00 PM PST by DTogo (Time to bring back the Sons of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad
a move opponents say puts conservative ideology ahead of the needs of constituents struggling with foreclosures and unemployment.

I say that Conservative ideology is absolutely consistent with the needs of etc. etc. If the "victims" had practiced it in the first place, many of them wouldn't be in the straits they are in now.

4 posted on 02/19/2009 12:08:32 PM PST by SlowBoat407 (Do not read this tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad
Did anyone read the interview with the aging perky one.She was asked about Sarah Palin’s interview and she had the cajones to say it was fair and she thought she asked pertinent questions ( ahhhh what magazines do you read....) Go Sarah, there's a revolution coming
5 posted on 02/19/2009 12:09:51 PM PST by shadeaud (Time to smell the roses and not the stench coming from D .C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad
But still it makes you shake your head.

Yeah, imagine that - politicians willing to risk their political futures by putting principles ahead of a place at the public funds slop-trough.

6 posted on 02/19/2009 12:10:08 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

7 posted on 02/19/2009 12:10:54 PM PST by william clark (Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad
"Thanks, but no thanks..."


8 posted on 02/19/2009 12:11:26 PM PST by Sopater (I'm so sick of atheists shoving their religion in my face.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad
...a move opponents say puts conservative ideology ahead of the needs of constituents struggling with foreclosures and unemployment.

I know this is a rhetorical question but... considering most of your liberal colleagues do not pay their taxes hence they do nothing to help, what about the needs of us constituents struggling to pay for all your social programs to help those you have no business helping?

11 posted on 02/19/2009 12:12:54 PM PST by The Anti-One (So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stillwaters
Though none has outright rejected the money available for education, healthcare, and infrastructure, the governors of Alaska, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas have all questioned whether the $787 billion bill signed into law this week will help the economy.

This is one of those times it might be worthwhile to email Governor Otter and offer support and encouragement.

email link

12 posted on 02/19/2009 12:13:27 PM PST by lonevoice (Ich bin ein plumber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad
“My concern is there’s going to be commitments attached to it that are a mile long,” said Governor Rick Perry of Texas. “We need the freedom to pick and choose. And we need the freedom to say ‘No thanks.’ ”

Thank you, Governor Perry. Please, please remain steadfast on this.

13 posted on 02/19/2009 12:13:31 PM PST by Allegra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

That includes, of course, Sarah Palin 2012

&&&
Sarah Palin 2012? Did Sarah change her name without telling us?


15 posted on 02/19/2009 12:14:50 PM PST by Bigg Red (Palin in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

a move opponents say puts conservative ideology ahead of the needs of constituents struggling with foreclosures and unemployment.

Is that there way of suggesting that Liberalism is the only thing that would fulfill the needs of the constituents?


21 posted on 02/19/2009 12:22:20 PM PST by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

I’d like to see Arnold reject this bogus stimulus package.
Oh...wait, the article said GOP governors. Sorry.


26 posted on 02/19/2009 12:31:32 PM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

Looks like she’s ready to reject another Bridge to Nowhere! Go Saracuda!

Pray for America, Our Troops and Gov Palin


27 posted on 02/19/2009 12:36:06 PM PST by bray (The District of Corruption fits Obama like a Glove)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

Waiting for the hate-brigade to explain us that Palin is actually a non-conservative ditz...


29 posted on 02/19/2009 12:38:05 PM PST by SolidWood (Palin: "In Alaska we eat therefore we hunt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

It isn’t like they are actually going to reject it. Most said they considered it but will take it.


31 posted on 02/19/2009 12:40:10 PM PST by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

I think they should accept the money. While the package is un-american and will never work, it can still provide benefits like roads and bridges to the state. Refusing the money, and then being taxed to pay for it all, is simply stupid. Now if you could refuse the money and be exempt from the taxes required to pay it back, that would be different.


35 posted on 02/19/2009 1:01:02 PM PST by Robbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

wow..hardcore and Palin in the same sentence..nice..


36 posted on 02/19/2009 1:08:10 PM PST by BerniesFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

Or maybe they should take the money, so long as it has no strings attached, and show the feds what might really work-—helping those who actually will help the economy, not suck it dry, if they could only become a bit more financially liquid.


38 posted on 02/19/2009 1:34:46 PM PST by fightinJAG (Good riddance, UAW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lewisglad

Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal is also “considering” not accepting the government socialist pork fund.

Why? He put it this way: he’s going to look at what strings are attached.

Too many federal socialist strings, and the money aint worth turning your life over to the big government God-surrogate state.

So it ISN’T about putting “GOP ideology ahead of the welfare of the people.” That is a straw man. It is demagoguery. It is exactly how the blatantly corrupt and dishonest media is trying to present it.


43 posted on 02/19/2009 2:26:28 PM PST by Michael Eden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson