Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Illinois: Bill HB0687 (FIREARM OWNERS ID-INSURANCE)
Illinois Gov/legislation ^

Posted on 02/18/2009 7:15:22 AM PST by yankeedame

Bill Status of HB0687 96th General Assembly

Short Description: FIREARM OWNERS ID-INSURANCE

House Sponsors
Rep. Kenneth Dunkin

Statutes Amended In Order of Appearance

430 ILCS 65/4.5 new
430 ILCS 65/8 from Ch. 38, par. 83-8

Synopsis As Introduced

Amends the Firearm Owners Identification Card Act. Provides that any person who owns a firearm in this State shall maintain a policy of liability insurance in the amount of at least $1,000,000 specifically covering any damages resulting from negligent or willful acts involving the use of such firearm while it is owned by such person.

Provides that a person shall be deemed the owner of a firearm after the firearm is lost or stolen until such loss or theft is reported to the police department or sheriff of the jurisdiction in which the owner resides. Provides that the Department of State Police shall revoke and seize a Firearm Owner's Identification Card previously issued under this Act if the Department finds that the person to whom such card was issued possesses or acquires a firearm and does not submit evidence to the Department of State Police that he or she has been issued in his or her name a liability insurance policy in the amount of at least $1,000,000 specifically covering any damages resulting from negligent or willful acts involving the use of such firearm while it is owned by such person. Effective January 1, 2010.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: banglist; lping
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

1 posted on 02/18/2009 7:15:22 AM PST by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

Adios 2nd. Amendment. And if you don’t pay they take you away.


2 posted on 02/18/2009 7:17:26 AM PST by shankbear (Al-Qaeda grew while Monica blew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

Time to take a day from work, and march on Springfield en masse. Enough of this bullsh**.


3 posted on 02/18/2009 7:17:26 AM PST by mgc1122
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

Whoever it was yesterday that predicted this, come and take a bow. They’re not outlawing gun ownership, they’re just going to make it too expensive to own one.


4 posted on 02/18/2009 7:17:46 AM PST by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

Has this been passed?


5 posted on 02/18/2009 7:18:02 AM PST by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck. (Let them eat arugula!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

Ah, the socialization of your life delivered by the socialization of risk through the socialists. Clever aren’t they?


6 posted on 02/18/2009 7:19:17 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

Once again...Illinois is in the “front” of breaching the Constitution.

This is WAY out of hand...these guys show no sign of stopping!


7 posted on 02/18/2009 7:21:37 AM PST by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

More on this lightweight socialist...here...

http://www.ilga.gov/house/Rep.asp?MemberID=1025


8 posted on 02/18/2009 7:22:18 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

I’m a criminal defense lawyer in Illinois and haven’t heard a thing about this law. Normally something like this would have a criminal penalty attached. I’ll ask around and post what I find.


9 posted on 02/18/2009 7:25:24 AM PST by DGodbey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6
No. It wont be either. Another in an endless stream of nonsensical proposals coming from a couple of Chicago representatives. So far the insanity is confined primarily to Crook and the adjacent counties. Downstate representatives understand that this isn't the way to stay in office.
10 posted on 02/18/2009 7:25:58 AM PST by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

Not that I practice such but if the only reason you have a firearm is to mount a defense of home (or country), why would you obtain the FOID or it’s (possibly) requisite insurance.

If you defend your home, your gun will be confiscated and some sort of charge will be found.

If it comes to defending the Constitution, it’s a moot point.


11 posted on 02/18/2009 7:27:12 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (FreepMail me if you want on the Bourbon ping list!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DGodbey

Thanks very much.


12 posted on 02/18/2009 7:29:43 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

Am I interpretin gthis wrong? It seems like it says the owner is reponsible for the firearm even after it has been stolen?


13 posted on 02/18/2009 7:29:56 AM PST by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DGodbey

Actions
Date Chamber Action
2/5/2009 House Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Kenneth Dunkin
2/6/2009 House First Reading
2/6/2009 House Referred to Rules Committee

Not a law yet. Don’t forget, no Illinois lawmaker west of Route 47 or south of I80 that wants to get re-elected will vote for this, even the Democrats.


14 posted on 02/18/2009 7:31:23 AM PST by DGodbey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

let the revolution begin.......these ass clowns have no clue...


15 posted on 02/18/2009 7:32:48 AM PST by tatsinfla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

The state of NJ will not allow you to have or purchase a firearm with a “fire arms ID (BS) card”. I have a shot gun, rifle and handgun....it is my right to have one, PERIOD.

This administration has only ONE thing in mind...to take over this country. They know that the 2nd amendment is just another roadblock they need to get rid of in order to take this country over without any struggle.

If this keeps going, the Constitution will no longer exist! The only people it hurts are the LAW abiding citizens....


16 posted on 02/18/2009 7:35:00 AM PST by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel
Not that I practice such but if the only reason you have a firearm is to mount a defense of home (or country), why would you obtain the FOID or it’s (possibly) requisite insurance.

Because in Illinois it's a crime to posess or purchase a firearm or ammunition unless you have an FOID. Including a weapon kept in your home.

17 posted on 02/18/2009 7:38:59 AM PST by SJackson (a tax cut is non-targetedÂ…no guaranteeÂ…theyÂ’re free to invest anywhere that they want, J Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tatsinfla

“...these ass clowns have no clue...”

No, they know exactly what they are doing....and that’s destroying this country and stealing all the wealth and power from the people! That is their objective.

Let’s put it this way, if aliens came from outer space and told us over and over again that they will cure all sicknesses on this planet and people believed them, but you found out their real plan was to destroy all humanity, as a citizen, what would be the proper thing to do?


18 posted on 02/18/2009 7:39:36 AM PST by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2
Am I interpretin gthis wrong? It seems like it says the owner is reponsible for the firearm even after it has been stolen?

Unless you report the theft to the police, which is common sense.

19 posted on 02/18/2009 7:40:30 AM PST by SJackson (a tax cut is non-targetedÂ…no guaranteeÂ…theyÂ’re free to invest anywhere that they want, J Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2
For the purposes of this law, you're still considered "the owner" until you notify the police that the gun has been lost or stolen.
20 posted on 02/18/2009 7:40:53 AM PST by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson