Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama May Place U.S. Under International Criminal Court
humanevents.com ^ | 02/10/2009 | Thomas P. Kilgannon

Posted on 02/16/2009 10:49:57 AM PST by shielagolden

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-214 next last
To: shielagolden

If this happens, I predict a mass exodus from the military. Those that stay in the military will not shoot. We loose.


21 posted on 02/16/2009 11:00:59 AM PST by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden

It’s time to shine the light on this guy’s past that will get him kicked out of office.


22 posted on 02/16/2009 11:02:39 AM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden
God help our military and protect them from this man's wicked schemes.
23 posted on 02/16/2009 11:03:11 AM PST by 444Flyer (Don't beLIEve Obama..................Repent Nimrod!...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden

ARGGHHH! QUIT FRACKIN’ UP OUR COUNTRY YA JERK!


24 posted on 02/16/2009 11:04:23 AM PST by visualops (portraits.artlife.us or visit my freeper page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden
Obama May Place U.S. Under International Criminal Court

Obama does this and his government is in for a world of hurt.

25 posted on 02/16/2009 11:04:41 AM PST by Centurion2000 (01-20-2009 : The end of the PAX AMERICANA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden

Another socialist, globalist idea heading to fruition, I fear.

ANY attempt to abrogate US sovereignty should be met with a most vigorous opposition. I hope the Pubbies have it in them to mount such opposition. They will certainly be able to count on every freedom loving conservative in the country, I would hope, also.

Time to reclaim the country...


26 posted on 02/16/2009 11:05:31 AM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tx_eggman

You tried buying powder or primers lately ... sold out.
___________________________

Orders are being filled as fast as possible. There is a huge back log.


27 posted on 02/16/2009 11:05:34 AM PST by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden

I can’t believe how quickly we’re going down the sh*tter. This is so sad.


28 posted on 02/16/2009 11:06:08 AM PST by prismsinc (A.K.A. "The Terminator"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
"Obama wants to be just like Lincoln."

Yes. Especially the part about suspending Habeas Corpus, imposing martial law - stuff like that.

Coming soon. You betcha.

29 posted on 02/16/2009 11:06:22 AM PST by ChicagahAl (Don't blame me. I voted for Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden

Just one more thing for the next President to rescind.


30 posted on 02/16/2009 11:07:44 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden

Is Obama turning Clinton over to the ICC on the war crimes charges?

They’ve been waiting 10 years for him.


31 posted on 02/16/2009 11:08:29 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden
That could change under the Obama administration.

Oh...Mr. 0bama had best hope it does not. That would be a most egregious "misunderestimization" of the average American's love for his country and hatred of the U.N.

32 posted on 02/16/2009 11:08:36 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (All the oil's in Texas...but all the dipsticks are in Washington, DC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

constitutional means only what the current members of the supreme court want it to mean. I have no confidence that 5 of the current court members are even literate. They will sign off on this just as soon as it gets to them.


33 posted on 02/16/2009 11:08:39 AM PST by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden

We can expect Jim Robinson and etc. to be extradited to Europe and Canada for daring to criticise islam.


34 posted on 02/16/2009 11:08:43 AM PST by MahatmaGandu (Remember, remember, the twenty-sixth of November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden
"...nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself..."

Given that anything you say "can and will be used against you" and given that United States Courts, prosecutors, Congress, etc. aren't going to be able to provide immunity from the ICC for anything said and given that we won't know what will come under the authority of the ICC, not just now but in the future, I guess we can't answer any questions asked by United States Courts, prosecutors, Congress, etc.

Of course, considering the Linda Trip thing and the Lautenberg Amendment, that's pretty much true already.

35 posted on 02/16/2009 11:09:43 AM PST by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden

If you’re going to try anybody in this place for war crimes it has to be about Kosovo.


36 posted on 02/16/2009 11:10:08 AM PST by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden

A new meaning to “Sold down the river.”


37 posted on 02/16/2009 11:11:24 AM PST by oyez (People! You're being pimped!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden

sigh...
bookmark for later.


38 posted on 02/16/2009 11:12:07 AM PST by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden

I will never submit to the jurisdiction of any international court.


39 posted on 02/16/2009 11:15:19 AM PST by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden
Wouldn't this require a treaty of some sort? Obama would need 2/3rds of the Senate to consent.

-PJ

40 posted on 02/16/2009 11:15:36 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (You can never overestimate the Democrats' ability to overplay their hand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-214 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson