Posted on 02/13/2009 9:40:07 AM PST by Jim Noble
The Congress is about to pass an unconstitutional bill to seat Members of Congress elected by the population of the District of Columbia. I am reasonably sure the Supreme Court will overturn this law.
The problem will then arise of what to do with all those RAT voters. The Democrats and RINOs may have enough votes to create a "state of New Columbia" out of the residential districts of DC, either by an Organic Act or by amending the Constitution.
The problems with allowing this have been exhaustively discussed here. DC is too small, two automatic and permanent RAT Senators, etc, etc. The objection which prompted the creation of DC to begin with, though - that having the Seat of Government within any State would give that State too much power over the Federal Government - seems to have become obsolete, and is not sufficient reason to deny DC-ites their votes for Members of Congress and Senators.
I have favored retrocession to Maryland for years. However, this will never happen, because both Maryland and the Congress, whose consent would be required, will object.
My plan, however, has a chance to get around this.
Let's GIVE the RATs their "New Columbia". BUT, to counteract the perfectly reasonable and proper objection that it's too small, let's ADD to DC the counties of Prince Georges and Montgomery in Maryland, and the counties of Arlington, Fairfax, and Loudon in Virginia.
This WILL add two permanent RAT Senators, and 5-6 RAT Congressmen.
However, it will also restore Maryland and Virginia to competitiveness, and has a reasonable chance of adding 4 new GOP Senators from those states.
With trends running the way they are, representation for DC seems inevitable. Let's get ahead of the process and do it in a way which is least damaging to our freedom.
“The Congress is about to pass an unconstitutional bill to seat Members of Congress elected by the population of the District of Columbia.”
Of course they are...is there anyone in DC NOT a stark raving marxist???
No, they don't: amendments to the Constitution must be ratified by the States, and not just by a simple majority.
Ever hear of the ERA Amendment? No?
That's because it wasn't ratified.
Hmmm interesting proposal. Well thought out.
Oh, heck no.
If they make DC a “state” then Texas should invoke one of the privileges it retained when it joined the union. The privilege was that it can split into 4 or 5 states if it chooses. That would give 8 to 10 more GOP (hopefully) Senators.
'getting around' the constitution is never a good idea
if the people that live there want 'representation' - move
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Even in tooday’s climate, 3/4 of the states would not vote for it.
It's a fallacy that the people of DC have no representation. That's just a brazenly false Leftist claim designed to increase Dem numbers in the House and Senate. Trust me. If DC was majority white Republican instead of majority black Democrat, this subject would never be on the table.
In point of fact, the District of Columbia is unique because it is represented by the ENTIRE federal Congress. That's right. It's one of the enumerated powers in Section 8 of the United States Constitution:
To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States...
Granted, these days the Constitution is little more than something congress critters wipe their collective butts on daily, but the truth is still the truth in my neck of the woods.
I don't know if I would bet the farm on that. South Texas is all Dem and Austin, Houston, and Dallas is pretty much Dem urban areas. Austin is San Fransisco west. Big cities are just like Detroit, or Philly and DC. I understand the principle, but it may backfire.
Also, I don't understand the fuss anyway because DC is specifically enumerated in the Constitution. The rest of the country would have to vote on any changes. If you want representatives, move the hell out. If DC wants to be like everywhere else then move Washington out to Alabama or Wyoming. DC can just be like any other ghetto then.
NO, first it would take a Constitutional Amendment (and there are much bigger issues out there that warrent one), 2nd I think that’s a bad idea (5-6 PERMANENT DEM REPS, 2 SENATORS)- Just for “competitiveness”..come on that would be suicide.
2ndly IF YOU REALLY WANT DC STATEHOOD: I’d only support this if we split one of the very conservative states into two-and made sure we “had 2 PERMANENT SENATORS, 1+ REP, Too..)!
Here’s a better idea - Move the capital to the geographic center of America. Let the city of Washington become part of Virginia or Maryland.
Well I was reasonably sure that the Supreme Court would overturn McCain-Feingold.
The East Shore of Maryland voted for McCain/Palin with 56%. The counties east of Baltimore have about 670,000 people (including Harford, Cecil, Kent, Queen Anne's, Caroline, Talbot, Dorchester, Wicomico, Somerset, Worcester counties).
In 2008 D.C. had 591,833 people -- that's more than Wyoming which had 532,668 people in 2008 according to Census Bureau 2008 estimate
That's Lebanon, KS, in north central Kansas just south of the Nebraska border. Better would be to move all the capital museums and other good stuff almost as far from the east, west and gulf coasts as possible such as near Rapid City, South Dakota -- near the Black Hills and the Badlands.
Technically DC residents should be treated as residents of Puerto Rico and Guam..no Federal Income Tax.
No, I really want Nancy to spend her time in Lebanon KS.
Did you take Alaska and Hawaii into your calculation of the center?
I am actually quite serious about this proposal. The location of Washington makes it very difficult for representatives from the west to serve their constituents. In addition, power is shifted, abnormally, to the Northeast, in part, due to the location of the capital. In addition, the move would be a make-works project that would make the WPA pale in comparison.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.